Hybridization of solar dish‐stirling technology: Analysis and design

Integration of renewable energies differentiates high concentration solar thermal technologies from photovoltaics. The popularization of high concentration solar thermal technologies facilities can be increased if alternative energy sources are used, with a significant advantage in investment recovery. As the operation hours are increased, the environmental impact is also improved. This article analyzes the hybridization of two dish-Stirling facilities, distinguishable by the two different fuels utilized: natural gas and biogas. Different considerations for the design of required elements for hybridization are presented, specifically the burner and the heat exchanger for biogas use. An evaluation of the environmental impact associated with hybridization using natural gas and then biogas is also carried out. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is performed with SimaPro software for each fuel scenario using: (i) the Ecoindicator-99 impact evaluation method; and (ii) CO2-equivalent emissions. Novel aspects of this study include the analysis of the global output of the hybrid system, considering two different fuels. Analysis also takes into consideration environmental criteria to establish a comparison. Results show an advantage for hybridization using biogas, a renewable source, instead of natural gas. The environmental viewpoint, considered by the LCA, adds a differential decision criterion at the same time that it favors investments in this technology. © 2014 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Environ Prog, 33: 1459–1466, 2014

[1]  Charles Baukal,et al.  Industrial Burners Handbook , 2003 .

[2]  M. Goedkoop,et al.  The Eco-indicator 99, A damage oriented method for Life Cycle Impact Assessment , 1999 .

[3]  L. Ciraolo,et al.  A Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of a Paraboloidal-Dish Solar Thermal Power Generation System , 2006, 2006 First International Symposium on Environment Identities and Mediterranean Area.

[4]  Vanessa Arellano Banoni,et al.  The place of solar power: an economic analysis of concentrated and distributed solar power , 2012, Chemistry Central Journal.

[5]  Reiner Buck,et al.  Dish-Stirling Systems: An Overview of Development and Status , 2003 .

[6]  Alfonso Pantoja López,et al.  Avanzar en generación eléctrica distribuida (y II) , 2007 .

[7]  Elias K. Stefanakos,et al.  Solar thermal power plant simulation , 2013 .

[8]  Luis M. Serra,et al.  Geographic evaluation of trigeneration systems in the tertiary sector. Effect of climatic and electricity supply conditions , 2011 .

[9]  J. Eyer,et al.  Market potential for distributed solar dish-stirling power plants operated in solar-only and solar/natural gas hybrid modes , 1999, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[10]  Luis M. Serra,et al.  Thermoeconomic and environmental analyses for the synthesis of polygeneration systems in the residential-commercial sector , 2011 .

[11]  Amit Jain,et al.  Optimization studies for hybrid and storage designs for parabolic solar trough systems with the system advisor model , 2013 .

[12]  Luis M. Serra,et al.  Environmental evaluation of dish-Stirling technology for power generation , 2012 .

[13]  R. Kannan,et al.  Life cycle assessment study of solar PV systems: An example of a 2.7 kWp distributed solar PV system in Singapore , 2006 .

[14]  Amit Jain,et al.  Optimizing the cost and performance of parabolic trough solar plants with thermal energy storage in India , 2013 .

[15]  Gerald Rebitzer,et al.  IMPACT 2002+: A new life cycle impact assessment methodology , 2003 .

[16]  Varun,et al.  LCA of renewable energy for electricity generation systems—A review , 2009 .

[17]  Anna Stoppato,et al.  Life cycle assessment of photovoltaic electricity generation , 2008 .

[18]  J M Barea,et al.  ENERGY ANALYSIS OF PARABOLIC TROUGH SOLAR POWER STATION WITH AND WITHOUT BIOMASS HYBRIDIZATION , 2012 .