Clinical experiences and usefulness of cervical posterior stabilization with polyaxial screw-rod system.

OBJECTIVE The objective of this study is to investigate the safety, surgical efficacy, and advantages of a polyaxial screw-rod system for posterior occipitocervicothoracic arthrodesis. METHODS Charts and radiographs of 32 patients who underwent posterior cervical fixation between October 2004 and February 2006 were retrospectively reviewed. Posterior cervical polyaxial screw-rod fixation was applied on the cervical spine and/or upper thoracic spine. The surgical indication was fracture or dislocation in 18, C1-2 ligamentous injury with trauma in 5, atlantoaxial instability by rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) in 4, cervical spondylosis with myelopathy in 4, and spinal metastatic tumor in 1. The patients were followed up and evaluated based on their clinical status and radiographs at 1, 3, 6 months and 1 year after surgery. RESULTS A total of 189 screws were implanted in 32 patients. Fixation was carried out over an average of 3.3 spinal segment (range, 2 to 7). The mean follow-up interval was 20.2 months. This system allowed for screw placement in the occiput, C1 lateral mass, C2 pars, C3-7 lateral masses, as well as the lower cervical and upper thoracic pedicles. Satisfactory bony fusion and reduction were achieved and confirmed in postoperative flexion-extension lateral radiographs and computed tomography (CT) scans in all cases. Revision surgery was required in two cases due to deep wound infection. One case needed a skin graft due to necrotic change. There was one case of kyphotic change due to adjacent segmental degeneration. There were no other complications, such as cord or vertebral artery injury, cerebrospinal fluid leak, screw malposition or back-out, or implant failure, and there were no cases of postoperative radiculopathy due to foraminal stenosis. CONCLUSION Posterior cervical stabilization with a polyaxial screw-rod system is a safe and reliable technique that appears to offer several advantages over existing methods. Further biomechanical testings and clinical experiences are needed in order to determine the true benefits of this procedure.

[1]  L. Sekhon.  Posterior Cervical Lateral Mass Screw Fixation: Analysis of 1026 Consecutive Screws in 143 Patients , 2005, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[2]  Shigenobu Sato,et al.  Spinal Reconstruction Using a Cervical Pedicle Screw System , 2005, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[3]  R. Wharen,et al.  Lateral mass screw-rod fixation of the cervical spine: a prospective clinical series with 1-year follow-up. , 2003, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[4]  P. Mummaneni,et al.  Posterior cervical fixation using a new polyaxial screw and rod system: technique and surgical results. , 2002, Neurosurgical focus.

[5]  H. Nauta,et al.  Techniques and pitfalls of cervical lateral mass plate fixation. , 2000, American journal of orthopedics.

[6]  S. Garfin,et al.  Spine update: cervical spine internal fixation using screw and screw-plate constructs. , 2000, Spine.

[7]  R. Yeasting,et al.  The anatomic relation of lateral mass screws to the spinal nerves. A comparison of the Magerl, Anderson, and An techniques. , 1999, Spine.

[8]  N. Baldwin.  Posterior Cervical Arthrodesis and Stabilization: An Early Report Using a Novel Lateral Mass Screw and Rod Technique , 1999 .

[9]  Kellogg,et al.  Posterior cervical arthrodesis and stabilization: an early report using a novel lateral mass screw and rod technique , 1999, Neurosurgery.

[10]  R. Yeasting,et al.  Safe Lateral‐Mass Screw Lengths in the Roy‐Camille and Magerl Techniques: An Anatomic Study , 1998, Spine.

[11]  R. Yeasting,et al.  Modified Magerl technique of lateral mass screw placement in the lower cervical spine: an anatomic study. , 1998, Journal of spinal disorders.

[12]  K. Follett,et al.  Complications of Posterior Articular Mass Plate Fixation of the Subaxial Cervical Spine in 43 Consecutive Patients , 1998, Spine.

[13]  D. Silcox,et al.  Cervical Pedicle Screws Versus Lateral Mass Screws: Anatomic Feasibility and Biomechanical Comparison , 1997, Spine.

[14]  H. An,et al.  Posterior Cervical Fixation for Fracture and Degenerative Disc Disease , 1997, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[15]  M. Swank,et al.  Rigid internal fixation with lateral mass plates in multilevel anterior and posterior reconstruction of the cervical spine. , 1997, Spine.

[16]  R. E. Kinard,et al.  Posterior Cervical Arthrodesis and Stabilization With a Lateral Mass Plate: Clinical and Computed Tomographic Evaluation of Lateral Mass Screw Placement and Associated Complications , 1996, Spine.

[17]  D. Silcox,et al.  Complications of Posterior Cervical Plating , 1995, Spine.

[18]  A. Crockard.  Evaluation of spinal laminar fixation by a new, flexible stainless steel cable (Sof'wire): early results. , 1994, Neurosurgery.

[19]  W. Rauschning,et al.  Anatomical and morphometric studies in posterior cervical spinal screw-plate systems. , 1994, Journal of spinal disorders.

[20]  F. Magerl,et al.  Posterior Stabilization of the Cervical Spine with Hook Plates , 1991, Spine.

[21]  C. Branch,et al.  Fixation of fractures of the lower cervical spine using methylmethacrylate and wire: technique and results in 99 patients. , 1989, Neurosurgery.

[22]  Fred H. Geisler,et al.  Titanium wire internal fixation for stabilization of injury of the cervical spine: clinical results and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging of the spinal cord. , 1989, Neurosurgery.

[23]  E. Benzel,et al.  Posterior cervical interspinous compression wiring and fusion for mid to low cervical spinal injuries. , 1989, Journal of neurosurgery.

[24]  F. Geisler,et al.  Use of titanium wire in cervical spine fixation as a means to reduce MR artifacts. , 1988, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[25]  S. Yoon,et al.  Clinical and Computed Tomography Evaluation of Plate and Screw on the Cervical Lateral Mass: A Modified Magerl's Technique. , 2006 .