First-in-man implantation of leadless ultrasound-based cardiac stimulation pacing system: novel endocardial left ventricular resynchronization therapy in heart failure patients.

AIMS The importance of specific-site pacing is increasingly recognized in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Using current pacing technology, site selection is still largely limited by coronary vein anatomy, whereas left ventricular (LV) endocardial pacing using current lead technology is risky and challenging. To overcome limitations and complications with current LV pacing, the feasibility of a new technology enabling LV endocardial stimulation without the use of a lead is being evaluated in patients. METHODS AND RESULTS Patients presented in this report are part of the Wireless Stimulation Endocardially for CRT Trial (WiSE-CRT) study investigating the safety and performance of the WiCS(®)-LV system, an implantable cardiac pacing system capable of leadless pacing based on converting ultrasound energy to electrical energy. Three patients are presented: (i) a patient with an existing implantable defibrillator, (ii) a patient with a CRT system whose LV lead does not capture, and (iii) a CRT patient classified as a non-responder. All three patients were successfully treated. Acute electrical pacing thresholds ranged from 0.7 to 1.0 V at 0.5 ms; all patients retained captured at 6 months. Functional New York Heart Association class significantly changed (Pre: III in two patients, and IV in one patient; Post: I in one patient, II in one patient, and II-III in one patient), and LV ejection fraction increased from 23.7 ± 3.4% to 39 ± 6.2% (P < 0.017). CONCLUSION This report on three first-in-man cases shows that leadless endocardial pacing may be safely applied and effective, conferring short- to-mid-term symptomatic benefits. These promising findings are yet to be substantiated by larger ongoing studies. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01294527.

[1]  Hung-Fat Tse,et al.  First human demonstration of cardiac stimulation with transcutaneous ultrasound energy delivery: implications for wireless pacing with implantable devices. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  K. Ellenbogen,et al.  Challenges and Solutions for Difficult Implantations of CRT Devices: The Role of New Technology and Techniques , 2007 .

[3]  C. Lau,et al.  Temporary leadless pacing in heart failure patients with ultrasound-mediated stimulation energy and effects on the acoustic window. , 2009, Heart rhythm.

[4]  David L Hayes,et al.  Clinical experience with pacemaker pulse generators and transvenous leads: an 8-year prospective multicenter study. , 2007, Heart rhythm.

[5]  H. Huikuri,et al.  Attenuated recovery of heart rate turbulence early after myocardial infarction identifies patients at high risk for fatal or near-fatal arrhythmic events. , 2010, Heart rhythm.

[6]  Martin J Schalij,et al.  Implantation-related complications of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and cardiac resynchronization therapy devices: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  J. Daubert,et al.  Safety of transvenous cardiac resynchronization system implantation in patients with chronic heart failure: combined results of over 2,000 patients from a multicenter study program. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  R. E. Riley,et al.  Feasibility and safety of a novel technology for pacing without leads. , 2006, Heart rhythm.

[9]  Mark A Hlatky,et al.  ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 guidelines for Device-Based Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities: executive summary. , 2008, Heart rhythm.

[10]  D. Dutka,et al.  Left ventricular lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy: where and how? , 2009, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[11]  C A Bucknall,et al.  Non-contact left ventricular endocardial mapping in cardiac resynchronisation therapy , 2003, Heart.

[12]  D. Shah,et al.  Comparison of chronic biventricular pacing between epicardial and endocardial left ventricular stimulation using Doppler tissue imaging in patients with heart failure. , 2001, American Journal of Cardiology.

[13]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Results of the Predictors of Response to CRT (PROSPECT) Trial , 2008, Circulation.

[14]  Catherine Klersy,et al.  Left Ventricular Endocardial Pacing Improves Resynchronization Therapy in Canine Left Bundle-Branch Hearts , 2009, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[15]  W. Abraham,et al.  Long‐Term Performance of the Attain Model 4193 Left Ventricular Lead , 2009, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[16]  Nicolas Derval,et al.  Optimizing hemodynamics in heart failure patients by systematic screening of left ventricular pacing sites: the lateral left ventricular wall and the coronary sinus are rarely the best sites. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  J. Daubert,et al.  Guidelines for cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: The Task Force for Cardiac Pacing and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association. , 2007, European heart journal.

[18]  M. Scheffer,et al.  Transseptal endocardial left ventricular pacing: an alternative technique for coronary sinus lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy. , 2007, Heart rhythm.