Optimal design of simulated moving‐bed processes under flow rate uncertainty

A general procedure for robust design of simulated moving-bed (SMB) processes under flow rate uncertainty is presented. The best solution is chosen only among candidate solutions that are robust feasible, that is, remain feasible for all flow rate perturbations from the uncertainty set. This gives rise to a robust approach to optimal SMB design in which the nominal problem is replaced by a worst case problem. Computational tractability is ensured by formulating the robust problem with only the vertices of the uncertainty region that most adversely affect the raffinate and extract purities. The nominal optimization problem and its robust counterpart are formulated with a single-column analog model, and a full-discretization approach for steady periodic dynamics. The resulting nonlinear programming problems are solved by an efficient interior-point solver. The procedure is successfully employed to find robust operating conditions for the linear separation of two nucleosides by standard SMB, asynchronous port switching (Varicol), and cyclic flow rate modulation (PowerFeed). Our results show that PowerFeed is the most efficient operating scheme for the separation under study, although Varicol also clearly outperforms the standard SMB process. However, it is also shown that Varicol productivity is the least affected when the process is rendered robust, whereas that of PowerFeed is the most penalized. © 2007 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 2007

[1]  José P. B. Mota,et al.  Synchronous and asynchronous SMB processes for gas separation , 2007 .

[2]  Arkadi Nemirovski,et al.  Robust optimization – methodology and applications , 2002, Math. Program..

[3]  José P. B. Mota,et al.  Single-Column Simulated-Moving-Bed Process with Recycle Lag , 2005 .

[4]  Marco Mazzotti,et al.  Experimental assessment of powerfeed chromatography , 2004 .

[5]  Robert J. Wooley,et al.  Standing‐wave design of tandem SMB for linear multicomponent systems , 2002 .

[6]  Massimo Morbidelli,et al.  Optimal operation of simulated moving bed units for nonlinear chromatographic separations , 1997 .

[7]  Massimo Morbidelli,et al.  PowerFeed operation of simulated moving bed units: changing flow-rates during the switching interval. , 2003, Journal of chromatography. A.

[8]  Massimo Morbidelli,et al.  Continuous chromatographic processes with a small number of columns: Comparison of simulated moving bed with Varicol, PowerFeed, and ModiCon , 2004 .

[9]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms , 2001, Wiley-Interscience series in systems and optimization.

[10]  Manfred Morari,et al.  Optimizing control of simulated moving beds--experimental implementation. , 2005, Journal of chromatography. A.

[11]  Ignacio E. Grossmann,et al.  Optimum design of chemical plants with uncertain parameters , 1978 .

[12]  José P B Mota,et al.  Experimental assessment of simulated moving bed and varicol processes using a single-column setup. , 2007, Journal of chromatography. A.

[13]  M. Morbidelli,et al.  Simulated moving-bed chromatography and its application to chirotechnology. , 2000, Trends in biotechnology.

[14]  Lorenz T. Biegler,et al.  On the implementation of an interior-point filter line-search algorithm for large-scale nonlinear programming , 2006, Math. Program..

[15]  L. Biegler,et al.  Nonlinear Programming Superstructure for Optimal Dynamic Operations of Simulated Moving Bed Processes , 2006 .

[16]  D. Ruthven,et al.  Counter-current and simulated counter-current adsorption separation processes , 1989 .

[17]  S. Engell,et al.  Optimization of simulated moving bed and Varicol processes. , 2003, Journal of chromatography. A.

[18]  Ernst Dieter Gilles,et al.  A new concept for operating simulated moving-bed processes , 1999 .

[19]  Sungyong Mun,et al.  Robust Pinched-Wave Design of a Size-Exclusion Simulated Moving-Bed Process for Insulin Purification , 2003 .

[20]  Larry Miller,et al.  Resolution of a racemic pharmaceutical intermediate. A comparison of preparative HPLC, steady state recycling, and simulated moving bed. , 2004, Journal of chromatography. A.

[21]  Phillip C. Wankat,et al.  SMB Operation Strategy−Partial Feed , 2002 .

[22]  Olivier Ludemann-Hombourger,et al.  The “VARICOL” Process: A New Multicolumn Continuous Chromatographic Process , 2000 .

[23]  R. C. Rodrigues,et al.  Optimal design and operation of a certain class of asynchronous simulated moving bed processes. , 2006, Journal of chromatography. A.

[24]  Jochen Strube,et al.  Comparison of Batch Elution and Continuous Simulated Moving Bed Chromatography , 1998 .

[25]  Ignacio E. Grossmann,et al.  Optimal process design under uncertainty , 1983 .

[26]  Ignacio E. Grossmann,et al.  Systematic Methods of Chemical Process Design , 1997 .

[27]  S. Engell,et al.  Optimal Operation of Continuous Chromatographic Processes: Mathematical Optimization of the VARICOL Process , 2002 .

[28]  Massimo Morbidelli,et al.  Robust design of binary countercurrent adsorption separation processes , 1993 .

[29]  L. Biegler,et al.  Optimization strategies for simulated moving bed and PowerFeed processes , 2006 .

[30]  José P. B. Mota,et al.  Use of Single-Column Models for Efficient Computation of the Periodic State of a Simulated Moving-Bed Process , 2006 .

[31]  Nien-Hwa Linda Wang,et al.  Simulated Moving Bed Equipment Designs , 2004 .

[32]  Nien-Hwa Linda Wang,et al.  Standing wave analysis of SMB chromatography: Linear systems , 1997 .

[33]  Olivier Dapremont,et al.  Batch and simulated moving bed chromatographic resolution of a pharmaceutical racemate. , 2003, Journal of chromatography. A.