Systematic Phosphorylation Analysis of Human Mitotic Protein Complexes

Analysis of the phosphorylation of mitotic protein complexes suggests that specific members of the complexes relay regulatory signals to these molecular machines. Regulating Mitotic Machines Most proteins do not function in isolation; they are part of large macromolecular complexes. Hegemann et al. used information available about the protein complexes involved in mitosis and then performed mass spectrometry to determine the phosphoproteome of these mitotic machines. Certain proteins in each complex were phosphorylated at many more sites than other proteins in the complex and thus may represent master regulators of the activities of these mitotic machines. Experiments with specific inhibitors of Polo-like kinase 1 and Aurora kinase B enabled the identification of specific targets of these mitotic kinases, providing insight into the mechanism by which these two kinases regulate the activity of mitotic complexes to control progression through the complicated process of cell division. Progression through mitosis depends on a large number of protein complexes that regulate the major structural and physiological changes necessary for faithful chromosome segregation. Most, if not all, of the mitotic processes are regulated by a set of mitotic protein kinases that control protein activity by phosphorylation. Although many mitotic phosphorylation events have been identified in proteome-scale mass spectrometry studies, information on how these phosphorylation sites are distributed within mitotic protein complexes and which kinases generate these phosphorylation sites is largely lacking. We used systematic protein-affinity purification combined with mass spectrometry to identify 1818 phosphorylation sites in more than 100 mitotic protein complexes. In many complexes, the phosphorylation sites were concentrated on a few subunits, suggesting that these subunits serve as “switchboards” to relay the kinase-regulatory signals within the complexes. Consequent bioinformatic analyses identified potential kinase-substrate relationships for most of these sites. In a subsequent in-depth analysis of key mitotic regulatory complexes with the Aurora kinase B (AURKB) inhibitor Hesperadin and a new Polo-like kinase (PLK1) inhibitor, BI 4834, we determined the kinase dependency for 172 phosphorylation sites on 41 proteins. Combination of the results of the cellular studies with Scansite motif prediction enabled us to identify 14 sites on six proteins as direct candidate substrates of AURKB or PLK1.

[1]  J. Gerhart,et al.  Changes in protein phosphorylation accompanying maturation of Xenopus laevis oocytes. , 1977, Developmental biology.

[2]  U. Kutay,et al.  Orchestrating nuclear envelope disassembly and reassembly during mitosis , 2009, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[3]  J. Peters,et al.  Two Distinct Pathways Remove Mammalian Cohesin from Chromosome Arms in Prophase and from Centromeres in Anaphase , 2000, Cell.

[4]  K. Jeang,et al.  Requirements for Protein Phosphorylation and the Kinase Activity of Polo-like Kinase 1 (Plk1) for the Kinetochore Function of Mitotic Arrest Deficiency Protein 1 (Mad1)* , 2008, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[5]  R. Durbin,et al.  Phenotypic profiling of the human genome by time-lapse microscopy reveals cell division genes , 2010, Nature.

[6]  J. Peters,et al.  The Small-Molecule Inhibitor BI 2536 Reveals Novel Insights into Mitotic Roles of Polo-like Kinase 1 , 2007, Current Biology.

[7]  J. Kornhauser,et al.  PhosphoSite: A bioinformatics resource dedicated to physiological protein phosphorylation , 2004, Proteomics.

[8]  J. Peters,et al.  The small molecule Hesperadin reveals a role for Aurora B in correcting kinetochore–microtubule attachment and in maintaining the spindle assembly checkpoint , 2003, The Journal of cell biology.

[9]  J. Ellenberg,et al.  The entire Nup107-160 complex, including three new members, is targeted as one entity to kinetochores in mitosis. , 2004, Molecular biology of the cell.

[10]  J. Peters,et al.  Identification of cell cycle-dependent phosphorylation sites on the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome by mass spectrometry. , 2005, Methods in enzymology.

[11]  A. Desai,et al.  A Combined Approach for the Localization and Tandem Affinity Purification of Protein Complexes from Metazoans , 2005, Science's STKE.

[12]  E. Harlow,et al.  Using Antibodies: A Laboratory Manual , 1999 .

[13]  Erich A. Nigg,et al.  Cell division: Mitotic kinases as regulators of cell division and its checkpoints , 2001, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[14]  S. Brunak,et al.  Quantitative Phosphoproteomics Reveals Widespread Full Phosphorylation Site Occupancy During Mitosis , 2010, Science Signaling.

[15]  E. Nigg,et al.  Tension-sensitive Plk1 phosphorylation on BubR1 regulates the stability of kinetochore microtubule interactions. , 2007, Genes & development.

[16]  F. M. Yeong,et al.  Identification of a Subunit of a Novel Kleisin-β/SMC Complex as a Potential Substrate of Protein Phosphatase 2A , 2003, Current Biology.

[17]  Ruedi Aebersold,et al.  Phosphorylation of Nup98 by Multiple Kinases Is Crucial for NPC Disassembly during Mitotic Entry , 2011, Cell.

[18]  T. Hirano,et al.  Functional contribution of Pds5 to cohesin-mediated cohesion in human cells and Xenopus egg extracts , 2005, Journal of Cell Science.

[19]  Student,et al.  THE PROBABLE ERROR OF A MEAN , 1908 .

[20]  E. Nigg,et al.  Quantitative analysis of the human spindle phosphoproteome at distinct mitotic stages. , 2009, Journal of proteome research.

[21]  Karl Mechtler,et al.  BAC TransgeneOmics: a high-throughput method for exploration of protein function in mammals , 2008, Nature Methods.

[22]  Hanno Steen,et al.  Different phosphorylation states of the anaphase promoting complex in response to antimitotic drugs: A quantitative proteomic analysis , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  Otto Hudecz,et al.  Spatial Exclusivity Combined with Positive and Negative Selection of Phosphorylation Motifs Is the Basis for Context-Dependent Mitotic Signaling , 2011, Science Signaling.

[24]  J. Ellenberg,et al.  Distinct functions of condensin I and II in mitotic chromosome assembly , 2004, Journal of Cell Science.

[25]  T. Mitchison Microtubule dynamics and kinetochore function in mitosis. , 1988, Annual review of cell biology.

[26]  Steven P Gygi,et al.  A probability-based approach for high-throughput protein phosphorylation analysis and site localization , 2006, Nature Biotechnology.

[27]  A. Hyman,et al.  Quantitative proteomics combined with BAC TransgeneOmics reveals in vivo protein interactions , 2010, The Journal of cell biology.

[28]  S. Elledge,et al.  A quantitative atlas of mitotic phosphorylation , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  T. Soderling,et al.  A structural basis for substrate specificities of protein Ser/Thr kinases: primary sequence preference of casein kinases I and II, NIMA, phosphorylase kinase, calmodulin-dependent kinase II, CDK5, and Erk1 , 1996, Molecular and cellular biology.

[30]  Rory A. Fisher,et al.  Statistical Methods for Research Workers. , 1956 .

[31]  Jesse J. Lipp,et al.  Histone H3 serine 10 phosphorylation by Aurora B causes HP1 dissociation from heterochromatin , 2005, Nature.

[32]  D. Vizard,et al.  Immunoaffinity purification of FLAG epitope-tagged bacterial alkaline phosphatase using a novel monoclonal antibody and peptide elution. , 1994, BioTechniques.

[33]  R. Durbin,et al.  Systematic Analysis of Human Protein Complexes Identifies Chromosome Segregation Proteins , 2010, Science.

[34]  R. Fisher Statistical methods for research workers , 1927, Protoplasma.

[35]  Edward P. Morris,et al.  Structures of APC/CCdh1 with substrates identify Cdh1 and Apc10 as the D-box co-receptor , 2010, Nature.

[36]  J. Peters The anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome: a machine designed to destroy , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[37]  M. Kirschner,et al.  Phosphorylation changes associated with the early cell cycle in Xenopus eggs. , 1987, Developmental biology.

[38]  E. Nigg,et al.  Exploring the functional interactions between Aurora B, INCENP, and survivin in mitosis. , 2003, Molecular biology of the cell.

[39]  Patrick G. A. Pedrioli,et al.  Phosphoproteomic Analysis Reveals Interconnected System-Wide Responses to Perturbations of Kinases and Phosphatases in Yeast , 2010, Science Signaling.

[40]  I. Sumara,et al.  The dissociation of cohesin from chromosomes in prophase is regulated by Polo-like kinase. , 2002, Molecular cell.

[41]  Rainer Malik,et al.  Comparative conservation analysis of the human mitotic phosphoproteome , 2008, Bioinform..

[42]  D. N. Perkins,et al.  Probability‐based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data , 1999, Electrophoresis.

[43]  Benjamin A. Garcia,et al.  Regulation of HP1–chromatin binding by histone H3 methylation and phosphorylation , 2005, Nature.

[44]  Karl Mechtler,et al.  Structure of the Anaphase-Promoting Complex/Cyclosome Interacting with a Mitotic Checkpoint Complex , 2009, Science.

[45]  Feng Zhang,et al.  The Plk1-dependent Phosphoproteome of the Early Mitotic Spindle* , 2010, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[46]  Lennart Martens,et al.  A guide to the Proteomics Identifications Database proteomics data repository , 2009, Proteomics.

[47]  T. Hirano,et al.  Human Wapl Is a Cohesin-Binding Protein that Promotes Sister-Chromatid Resolution in Mitotic Prophase , 2006, Current Biology.

[48]  E. Griffis,et al.  Nup98 localizes to both nuclear and cytoplasmic sides of the nuclear pore and binds to two distinct nucleoporin subcomplexes. , 2003, Molecular biology of the cell.

[49]  J. Shabanowitz,et al.  A neutral loss activation method for improved phosphopeptide sequence analysis by quadrupole ion trap mass spectrometry. , 2004, Analytical chemistry.

[50]  M. M. Bradford A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. , 1976, Analytical biochemistry.

[51]  Erich A Nigg,et al.  Phosphoproteome analysis of the human mitotic spindle. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[52]  U. Fischer,et al.  Cellular strategies for the assembly of molecular machines. , 2010, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[53]  J. Peters,et al.  Substrate binding on the APC/C occurs between the co-activator CDH1 and the processivity factor DOC1 , 2010, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[54]  Michael B Yaffe,et al.  MAPKAP kinase-2 is a cell cycle checkpoint kinase that regulates the G2/M transition and S phase progression in response to UV irradiation. , 2005, Molecular cell.

[55]  J. Ellenberg,et al.  Regulation of Sister Chromatid Cohesion between Chromosome Arms , 2004, Current Biology.

[56]  Hongtao Yu,et al.  Phosphorylation- and polo-box-dependent binding of Plk1 to Bub1 is required for the kinetochore localization of Plk1. , 2006, Molecular biology of the cell.

[57]  Karl Mechtler,et al.  Mitotic regulation of the human anaphase‐promoting complex by phosphorylation , 2003, The EMBO journal.

[58]  J. Peters,et al.  Wapl Controls the Dynamic Association of Cohesin with Chromatin , 2006, Cell.

[59]  Jean Gautier,et al.  Purified maturation-promoting factor contains the product of a Xenopus homolog of the fission yeast cell cycle control gene cdc2 + , 1988, Cell.

[60]  J. Peters,et al.  Expression of the CDH1-associated form of the anaphase-promoting complex in postmitotic neurons. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[61]  B. Alberts The Cell as a Collection of Protein Machines: Preparing the Next Generation of Molecular Biologists , 1998, Cell.

[62]  L. Cantley,et al.  Physical and functional interactions between SH2 and SH3 domains of the Src family protein tyrosine kinase p59fyn , 1994, Molecular and cellular biology.

[63]  I. Sumara,et al.  Characterization of Vertebrate Cohesin Complexes and Their Regulation in Prophase , 2000, The Journal of cell biology.

[64]  M. Yaffe,et al.  A motif-based profile scanning approach for genome-wide prediction of signaling pathways , 2001, Nature Biotechnology.

[65]  J. Peters,et al.  The cohesin complex and its roles in chromosome biology. , 2008, Genes & development.

[66]  J. Ellenberg,et al.  Condensin I Stabilizes Chromosomes Mechanically through a Dynamic Interaction in Live Cells , 2006, Current Biology.

[67]  E. Salmon,et al.  The spindle-assembly checkpoint in space and time , 2007, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[68]  T. Hirano,et al.  Cohesin release is required for sister chromatid resolution, but not for condensin-mediated compaction, at the onset of mitosis. , 2002, Genes & development.

[69]  Karl Mechtler,et al.  Dissociation of Cohesin from Chromosome Arms and Loss of Arm Cohesion during Early Mitosis Depends on Phosphorylation of SA2 , 2005, PLoS biology.

[70]  A. Hyman,et al.  Sororin Mediates Sister Chromatid Cohesion by Antagonizing Wapl , 2010, Cell.

[71]  Allegra Via,et al.  Phospho.ELM: a database of phosphorylation sites—update 2008 , 2007, Nucleic Acids Res..

[72]  P. Cohen Targeting protein kinases for the development of anti-inflammatory drugs. , 2009, Current opinion in cell biology.

[73]  Dietmar Riedel,et al.  Localization of the coactivator Cdh1 and the cullin subunit Apc2 in a cryo-electron microscopy model of vertebrate APC/C. , 2005, Molecular cell.

[74]  Tony J Collins,et al.  ImageJ for microscopy. , 2007, BioTechniques.

[75]  Michael B. Yaffe,et al.  Scansite 2.0: proteome-wide prediction of cell signaling interactions using short sequence motifs , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..