Blunt cerebrovascular injury screening with 64-channel multidetector computed tomography: More slices finally cut it

BACKGROUND Aggressive screening to diagnose blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) results in early treatment, leading to improved outcomes and reduced stroke rates. While computed tomographic angiography (CTA) has been widely adopted for BCVI screening, evidence of its diagnostic sensitivity is marginal. Previous work from our institution using 32-channel multidetector CTA in 684 patients demonstrated an inadequate sensitivity of 51% (Ann Surg. 2011,253: 444–450). Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) continues to be the reference standard of diagnosis but has significant drawbacks of invasiveness and resource demands. There have been continued advances in CT technology, and this is the first report of an extensive experience with 64-channel multidetector CTA. METHODS Patients screened for BCVI using CTA and DSA (reference) at a Level 1 trauma center during the 12-month period ending in May 2012 were identified. Results of CTA and DSA, complications, and strokes were retrospectively reviewed and compared. RESULTS A total of 594 patients met criteria for BCVI screening and underwent both CTA and DSA. One hundred twenty-eight patients (22% of those screened) had 163 injured vessels: 99 (61%) carotid artery injuries and 64 (39%) vertebral artery injuries. Sixty-four–channel CTA demonstrated an overall sensitivity per vessel of 68% and specificity of 92%. The 52 false-negative findings on CTA were composed of 34 carotid artery injuries and 18 vertebral artery injuries; 32 (62%) were Grade I injuries. Overall, positive predictive value was 36.2%, and negative predictive value was 97.5%. Six procedure-related complications (1%) occurred with DSA, including two iatrogenic dissections and one stroke. CONCLUSION Sixty-four–channel CTA demonstrated a significantly improved sensitivity of 68% versus the 51% previously reported for the 32-channel CTA (p = 0.0075). Sixty-two percent of the false-negative findings occurred with low-grade injuries. Considering complications, cost, and resource demand associated with DSA, this study suggests that 64-channel CTA may replace DSA as the primary screening tool for BCVI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Diagnostic study, level III.

[1]  E. Moore,et al.  Blunt Cerebrovascular Injuries , 2021, DeckerMed Neurology.

[2]  T. Fabian,et al.  Prospective Screening for Blunt Cerebrovascular Injuries: Analysis of Diagnostic Modalities and Outcomes , 2002, Annals of surgery.

[3]  Wilkins,et al.  Western Trauma Association critical decisions in trauma: screening for and treatment of blunt cerebrovascular injuries. , 2009, The Journal of trauma.

[4]  E. Moore,et al.  Treatment-Related Outcomes From Blunt Cerebrovascular Injuries: Importance of Routine Follow-Up Arteriography , 2002, Annals of surgery.

[5]  J. Weigelt,et al.  Screening for blunt cerebrovascular injuries is cost-effective. , 2011, The Journal of trauma.

[6]  T. Scalea,et al.  Blunt cerebrovascular injuries: does treatment always matter? , 2009, The Journal of trauma.

[7]  T. Fabian,et al.  Blunt Cerebrovascular Injury Screening With 32-Channel Multidetector Computed Tomography: More Slices Still Don't Cut It , 2011, Annals of surgery.

[8]  T. Fabian,et al.  Blunt cerebrovascular injuries: diagnosis and treatment. , 2001, The Journal of trauma.

[9]  E. Moore,et al.  Anticoagulation is the gold standard therapy for blunt carotid injuries to reduce stroke rate. , 2004, Archives of surgery.

[10]  J. Jarvik,et al.  Sixteen-slice CT angiography in patients with suspected blunt carotid and vertebral artery injuries. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[11]  E. Moore,et al.  Treatment for blunt cerebrovascular injuries: equivalence of anticoagulation and antiplatelet agents. , 2009, Archives of surgery.

[12]  C. Sliker,et al.  Diagnosis of blunt cerebrovascular injuries with 16-MDCT: accuracy of whole-body MDCT compared with neck MDCT angiography. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  T. Fabian,et al.  Blunt carotid injury. Importance of early diagnosis and anticoagulant therapy. , 1996 .

[14]  D. Leung,et al.  Computed Tomographic Angiography for the Diagnosis of Blunt Carotid/Vertebral Artery Injury: A Note of Caution , 2007, Annals of surgery.

[15]  C. Bloomer,et al.  Screening multidetector computed tomography angiography in the evaluation on blunt neck injuries: an evidence-based approach. , 2009, Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR.

[16]  Alexander L. Eastman,et al.  Computed tomographic angiography for the diagnosis of blunt cervical vascular injury: is it ready for primetime? , 2005, The Journal of trauma.

[17]  D. Magee,et al.  Computed tomographic angiography versus conventional angiography for the diagnosis of blunt cerebrovascular injury in trauma patients. , 2009, The Journal of trauma.

[18]  Ben L Zarzaur,et al.  Improving the screening criteria for blunt cerebrovascular injury: the appropriate role for computed tomography angiography. , 2011, The Journal of trauma.

[19]  E. Moore,et al.  Blunt carotid arterial injuries: implications of a new grading scale. , 1999, The Journal of trauma.

[20]  Alexander L. Eastman,et al.  CTA-based screening reduces time to diagnosis and stroke rate in blunt cervical vascular injury. , 2009, The Journal of trauma.

[21]  M. Schreiber,et al.  Blunt cerebrovascular injury practice management guidelines: the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma. , 2010, The Journal of trauma.

[22]  B. Walters,et al.  Management of blunt extracranial traumatic cerebrovascular injury: a multidisciplinary survey of current practice , 2011, World journal of emergency surgery : WJES.