Fairness considerations: increasing understanding of intentionality during adolescence.

The development of fairness considerations in decision making is not well understood. Here we tested the hypothesis that increased understanding of intentionality during adolescence underlies increased fairness considerations in social decision making. We conducted three experiments using an adapted version of the Ultimatum Game with participants during four stages of adolescence: 9, 12, 15, and 18 years of age. Participants made or evaluated monetary offers, and we manipulated the intentionality context of offers. Results show that strategic thinking is already present at 9 years of age. There was no age difference in fairness of offers when the responder could not reject an offer (Experiment 1), but when they could reject an offer there was an age-related increase in taking into account the perspective and intentionality of other players when making offers (Experiment 2) and evaluating offers (Experiment 3). Taken together, the results demonstrate a linear developmental transition in fairness considerations that may have important implications for our understanding of social interactions during adolescence.

[1]  Colin Camerer,et al.  When Does "Economic Man" Dominate Social Behavior? , 2006, Science.

[2]  U. Fischbacher,et al.  The nature of human altruism , 2003, Nature.

[3]  Kenneth H. Rubin,et al.  Peer Interactions, Relationships, and Groups , 2007 .

[4]  J. Keith Murnighan,et al.  Ultimatum bargaining by children and adults , 1998 .

[5]  J. Horowitz,et al.  Fairness in Simple Bargaining Experiments , 1994 .

[6]  William T. Harbaugh,et al.  Bargaining by Children , 2003 .

[7]  Jeffrey D Long,et al.  The interplay of social competence and psychopathology over 20 years: testing transactional and cascade models. , 2008, Child development.

[8]  B. Moore,et al.  Perspective-taking and altruism. , 1982 .

[9]  M. Sutter,et al.  Outcomes versus intentions: On the nature of fair behavior and its development with age , 2007 .

[10]  David F. Sally,et al.  The development of interpersonal strategy: Autism, theory-of-mind, cooperation and fairness , 2006 .

[11]  Sarah-Jayne Blakemore,et al.  Social cognitive development during adolescence. , 2006, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[12]  D. Barr,et al.  Limits on theory of mind use in adults , 2003, Cognition.

[13]  M A Just,et al.  From the SelectedWorks of Marcel Adam Just 1990 What one intelligence test measures : A theoretical account of the processing in the Raven Progressive Matrices Test , 2016 .

[14]  Patrick J. Leman,et al.  Children's and adolescents' decisions about sharing money with others , 2009 .

[15]  H. Wellman,et al.  Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development: the truth about false belief. , 2001, Child development.

[16]  Nancy Eisenberg,et al.  Age Changes in Prosocial Responding and Moral Reasoning in Adolescence and Early Adulthood. , 2005, Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence.

[17]  Masanori Takezawa,et al.  To give or not to give: children's and adolescents' sharing and moral negotiations in economic decision situations. , 2008, Child development.

[18]  Laurence Steinberg,et al.  Peer influence on risk taking, risk preference, and risky decision making in adolescence and adulthood: an experimental study. , 2005, Developmental psychology.

[19]  M. Pillutla,et al.  Fairness in Bargaining , 2003 .

[20]  Madan M. Pillutla,et al.  BEING FAIR OR APPEARING FAIR: STRATEGIC BEHAVIOR IN ULTIMATUM BARGAINING , 1995 .

[21]  R. Selman.  growth of interpersonal understanding , 1980 .

[22]  B. Sokol,et al.  Taking and Coordinating Perspectives: From Prereflective Interactivity, through Reflective Intersubjectivity, to Metareflective Sociality , 2008, Human Development.

[23]  J. Benenson,et al.  Children's altruistic behavior in the dictator game , 2007 .

[24]  L. Nummenmaa,et al.  Automatic activation of adolescents' peer-relational schemas: evidence from priming with facial identity. , 2008, Child development.

[25]  Iroise Dumontheil,et al.  Online usage of theory of mind continues to develop in late adolescence. , 2010, Developmental science.

[26]  C. Frith,et al.  Adolescent development of the neural circuitry for thinking about intentions , 2007, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[27]  William T. Harbaugh,et al.  Children's altruism in public good and dictator experiments , 2000 .

[28]  D. P. Hartmann,et al.  Why does children's generosity increase with age: susceptibility to experimenter influence or altruism? , 1985, Child development.

[29]  P. Westenberg,et al.  A developmental analysis of self-reported fears in late childhood through mid-adolescence: social-evaluative fears on the rise? , 2004, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[30]  W. Güth,et al.  An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining , 1982 .

[31]  Colin Camerer.  Strategizing in the Brain , 2003, Science.

[32]  E. Crone,et al.  Neural Correlates of Social Decision Making and Relationships , 2009, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[33]  U. Fischbacher,et al.  On the Nature of Fair Behavior , 1999 .

[34]  E. Dijk,et al.  Strategy and Fairness in Social Decision Making: Sometimes It Pays to Be Powerless ☆ ☆☆ , 2000 .

[35]  Matthias Sutter,et al.  Trust and trustworthiness across different age groups , 2007, Games Econ. Behav..

[36]  B. Rockenbach,et al.  Egalitarianism in young children , 2008, Nature.

[37]  L. Steinberg.  Cognitive and affective development in adolescence , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[38]  R. Selman,et al.  The Development of Interpersonal Understanding during Childhood, Preadolescence, and Adolescence: A Longitudinal Follow-Up Study. , 1982 .

[39]  Robert Hoffmann,et al.  Adolescent-Adult Interactions and Culture in the Ultimatum Game , 2006 .

[40]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  The norm of self-interest. , 1999, The American psychologist.