Investigation of signal thresholding to reduce the effects of instrument noise of an EMCCD based micro-CT system

This project investigated the signal thresholding effectiveness at reducing the instrument noise of an electron multiplying charged coupled device (EMCCD) based micro-CT system at low x-ray exposure levels. Scans of a mouse spine and an iodine phantom were taken using an EMCCD detector coupled with a micro-CT system. An iodine filter of 4 mg/cm2 area density was placed in the beam. The output signal was thresholded using some multiple of the inherent background noise. For each threshold, 100, 200, and 300 frames were summed for each projection to evaluate the effect on the reconstructed image. The projection images from the scans were compared using line profiles and their SNR. Our results indicate that, as the threshold was increased, the line profiles of the projection images showed less statistical variation, but also lower signal levels, so that the SNR of the projection images decreased as the threshold increased. When the line profile of a projection image obtained using a signal threshold is compared with one obtained using energy integrating mode, the profile obtained using thresholding had less variation than that obtained using energy integration, which indicates less instrument noise. The SNR at the edges of the scan object is higher in the thresholded images when compared with the energy integrated projection images. We conclude that thresholding the output signal from an EMCCD detector at low x-ray exposure levels is an effective method to reduce the instrument noise of an EMCCD detector.

[1]  I. Shestakova,et al.  Design and performance of an EMCCD based detector for combined SPECT/CT imaging , 2005, IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2005.

[2]  Ray Bell,et al.  Subelectron read noise at MHz pixel rates , 2001, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[3]  J. Hynecek,et al.  CCM-a new low-noise charge carrier multiplier suitable for detection of charge in small pixel CCD image sensors , 1992 .

[4]  David Dussault,et al.  Noise performance comparison of ICCD with CCD and EMCCD cameras , 2004, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[5]  Alojz Kodre,et al.  X-ray absorption coefficient of iodine in the K edge region , 2008 .

[6]  J. Hynecek Impactron-a new solid state image intensifier , 2001 .

[7]  Donal J. Denvir,et al.  Electron-multiplying CCD technology: application to ultrasensitive detection of biomolecules , 2002, SPIE BiOS.

[8]  Donal J. Denvir,et al.  Electron multiplying CCD technology: The new ICCD , 2003 .

[9]  Ray Bell,et al.  The LLCCD: low-light imaging without the need for an intensifier , 2001, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[10]  Bobby Lee Ulich,et al.  Intensified CCD (ICCD) dynamic range and noise performance , 1997, Optics & Photonics.

[11]  Eon O'Mongain,et al.  Charge-coupled devices: frame adding as an alternative to long integration times and cooling , 1992 .

[12]  F. J. Beekman,et al.  Electronics for a photon-counting gamma camera based on an electron-multiplying CCD , 2004 .

[13]  C. Mackay,et al.  Photon counting strategies with low-light-level CCDs , 2003, astro-ph/0307305.

[14]  F. Beekman,et al.  Photon-counting gamma camera based on an electron-multiplying CCD , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[15]  J. N. Hollenhorst A theory of multiplication noise , 1990 .

[16]  Stephen Rudin,et al.  Progress in electron-multiplying CCD (EMCCD) based high-resolution high-sensitivity x-ray detector for fluoroscopy and radiography , 2007, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[17]  K. Hoffmann,et al.  Self-calibration of a cone-beam micro-CT system. , 2008, Medical physics.

[18]  J. Hynecek,et al.  Excess noise and other important characteristics of low light level imaging using charge multiplying CCDs , 2003 .

[19]  B. Hadwen,et al.  The noise performance of electron multiplying charge-coupled devices , 2003 .

[20]  Daniel R. Bednarek,et al.  Cone-Beam Micro-CT System Based on LabVIEW Software , 2008, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[21]  Gary J. Royle,et al.  Evaluation of a novel CCD camera for dose reduction in digital radiography , 2000, 2000 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (Cat. No.00CH37149).

[22]  F. Beekman,et al.  Photon-counting versus an integrating CCD-based gamma camera: important consequences for spatial resolution , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.