On optimum selection relaying protocols in cooperative wireless networks

In this letter, the outage probabilities of selection relaying protocols are analyzed and compared for cooperative wireless networks. It is assumed that both source and relay use equal allocated time in transmission. Depending on the quality of the source-relay channel, the relay may choose either Decode-and-Forward (DF), Amplify-and-Forward (AF), or Direct-Transmission (DT) to forward signals. It turns out that in terms of outage probability, two selection relaying schemes are better than others: selecting between DF and AF protocols (DF-AF) or selecting between DF and DT protocols (DF-DT). It is shown that with an equal power allocation, both of the DF-AF and DF-DT selection relaying protocols have the same asymptotic outage probability. However, with an optimum power allocation strategy, the DF-AF selection scheme is in general better than the DF-DT selection scheme. Note that the optimum power allocations depend on channel variances, not on instantaneous channel gains. When the quality of the relay-destination link is much better than that of the source-relay link, observed from simulation, the outage probability of the DF-AF selection protocol with its optimum power allocation is 1.5 dB better than that of the DF-DT selection with its own optimum power allocation. Extensive simulations are presented to validate the analytical results.

[1]  K. J. Ray Liu,et al.  Cooperative Communication Protocols in Wireless Networks: Performance Analysis and Optimum Power Allocation , 2007, Wirel. Pers. Commun..

[2]  Gregory W. Wornell,et al.  Distributed space-time-coded protocols for exploiting cooperative diversity in wireless networks , 2003, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[3]  Meng Yu,et al.  Is amplify-and-forward practically better than decode-and-forward or vice versa? , 2005, Proceedings. (ICASSP '05). IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2005..

[4]  Elza Erkip,et al.  User cooperation diversity. Part I. System description , 2003, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[5]  Elza Erkip,et al.  User cooperation diversity. Part II. Implementation aspects and performance analysis , 2003, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[6]  Aria Nosratinia,et al.  Diversity through coded cooperation , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[7]  K. J. Ray Liu,et al.  SER performance analysis and optimum power allocation for decode-and-forward cooperation protocol in wireless networks , 2005, IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, 2005.

[8]  Aria Nosratinia,et al.  Cooperative communication in wireless networks , 2004, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[9]  Gregory W. Wornell,et al.  Cooperative diversity in wireless networks: Efficient protocols and outage behavior , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.