Hemispheric Asymmetry in Global/Local Processing: Effects of Stimulus Position and Spatial Frequency

We examined the neural mechanisms of functional asymmetry between hemispheres in the processing of global and local information of hierarchical stimuli by measuring hemodynamic responses with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). In a selective attention task, subjects responded to targets at the global or local level of compound letters that were (1) broadband in spatial-frequency spectrum and presented at fixation; (2) broadband and presented randomly to the left or the right of fixation; or (3) contrast balanced (CB) to remove low spatial frequencies (SFs) and presented at fixation. Central broadband stimuli induced stronger activation in the right middle occipital cortex under global relative to local attention conditions but in the left inferior occipital cortex, stronger activation was induced under local relative to global attention conditions. The asymmetry over the occipital cortex was weakened by unilateral presentation and by contrast balancing. The results indicate that the lateralization of global and local processing is modulated by the position and SF spectrum of the compound stimuli. The global attention also produced stronger activation over the medial occipital cortex relative to the local attention under all the stimulus conditions. The nature of these effects is discussed.

[1]  D. Navon Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[2]  E. William Yund,et al.  Is attentional selection to different levels of hierarchical structure based on spatial frequency , 1999 .

[3]  M. Torrens Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain—3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging, J. Talairach, P. Tournoux. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York (1988), 122 pp., 130 figs. DM 268 , 1990 .

[4]  Gereon R. Fink,et al.  Neuronal Activity in Early Visual Areas during Global and Local Processing: A Comment on Heinze, Hinrichs, Scholz, Burchert, and Mangun , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[5]  G. Mangun,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Global and Local Processing: A Combined PET and ERP Study , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[6]  M. Lamb,et al.  The Two Sides of Perception , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[7]  Yulong Ding,et al.  Neural mechanisms of perceptual grouping in humans as revealed by high density event related potentials , 2002, Neuroscience Letters.

[8]  Lynn C. Robertson,et al.  Attention and interference in the processing of global and local information: Effects of unilateral temporal-parietal junction lesions , 1989, Neuropsychologia.

[9]  R. Knight,et al.  Component mechanisms underlying the processing of hierarchically organized patterns: inferences from patients with unilateral cortical lesions. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[10]  E W Yund,et al.  The role of spatial frequency in the processing of hierarchically organized stimuli , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  J. Sergent The cerebral balance of power: confrontation or cooperation? , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  G W Humphreys,et al.  Parallel and competitive processes in hierarchical analysis: perceptual grouping and encoding of closure. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  G W Humphreys,et al.  Interactions between perceptual organization based on Gestalt laws and those based on hierarchical processing , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[14]  Y. Zhuo,et al.  On the Different Processing of Wholes and Parts: A Psychophysiological Analysis , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  D L Woods,et al.  Hierarchical processing and level-repetition effect as indexed by early brain potentials. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[16]  Joseph B. Hellige,et al.  Hemispheric differences are found in the identification, but not the detection, of low versus high spatial frequencies , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  J. R. Pomerantz Global and local precedence: selective attention in form and motion perception. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[18]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Where in the brain does visual attention select the forest and the trees? , 1996, Nature.

[19]  Craig E. L. Stark,et al.  When zero is not zero: The problem of ambiguous baseline conditions in fMRI , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  David B. Boles,et al.  Hemispheric Differences in Global versus Local Processing: Still Unclear , 1996, Brain and Cognition.

[21]  L. Robertson,et al.  Effects of lesions of temporal-parietal junction on perceptual and attentional processing in humans , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[22]  S Marrett,et al.  Local and global attention are mapped retinotopically in human occipital cortex. , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  G L Shulman,et al.  The Role of Spatial-Frequency Channels in the Perception of Local and Global Structure , 1986, Perception.

[24]  R. Egly,et al.  Spatial attention and cuing to global and local levels of hierarchical structure. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  G. Mangun,et al.  The neural mechanisms of top-down attentional control , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[26]  Y. Zhuo,et al.  Modulation of Brain Activities by Hierarchical Processing: A High-Density ERP Study , 2004, Brain Topography.

[27]  J. Marshall,et al.  Hemispheric asymmetries in global⧹local processing are modulated by perceptual salience , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[28]  M H Van Kleeck,et al.  Hemispheric differences in global versus local processing of hierarchical visual stimuli by normal subjects: new data and a meta-analysis of previous studies. , 1989, Neuropsychologia.

[29]  Thomas F. Münte,et al.  The Order of Global- and Local-Level Information Processing: Electrophysiological Evidence for Parallel Perceptual Processes , 1994 .

[30]  Antígona Martínez,et al.  Hemispneric asymmetries in global and local processing: evidence from fMRI , 1997, Neuroreport.

[31]  S. Hevenor,et al.  The effect of variability of unattended information on global and local processing: evidence for lateralization at early stages of processing , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[32]  R Kimchi,et al.  Hemispheric processing of global form, local form, and texture. , 1991, Acta psychologica.

[33]  J. Polich,et al.  Hemispheric local/global processing revisited. , 1990, Acta psychologica.

[34]  S Yantis,et al.  Attentional capture by globally defined objects , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[35]  E. William Yund,et al.  Spatial frequency and attention: Effects of level-, target-, and location-repetition on the processing of global and local forms , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[36]  E W Yund,et al.  Is attentional selection to different levels of hierarchical structure based on spatial frequency? , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[37]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Segmentation and selection contribute to local processing in hierarchical analysis , 2002, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[38]  D L Woods,et al.  Neural substrates for visual perceptual grouping in humans. , 2001, Psychophysiology.

[39]  M. Corbetta,et al.  A PET study of visuospatial attention , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[40]  G. R. Mangun,et al.  Neural Activity in Early Visual Areas During Global and Local Processing: A Reply to Fink, Marshall, Halligan, and Dolan , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[41]  Maryanne Martin,et al.  Hemispheric specialization for local and global processing , 1979, Neuropsychologia.

[42]  F L Kitterle,et al.  Hemispheric asymmetries in the identification of band-pass filtered letters , 1997, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[43]  L. Robertson,et al.  The effect of visual angle on global and local reaction times depends on the set of visual angles presented , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[44]  E. Yund,et al.  Attentional selection in the processing of hierarchical patterns: an ERP study , 2001, Biological Psychology.

[45]  C D Frith,et al.  Neural mechanisms involved in the processing of global and local aspects of hierarchically organized visual stimuli. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[46]  J Wilson,et al.  Spatial Frequency and Selective Attention to Local and Global Information , 1987, Perception.

[47]  F. J. Friedrich,et al.  Effects of parietal injury on covert orienting of attention , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[48]  A Zani,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence of a perceptual precedence of global vs. local visual information. , 1998, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[49]  L. Robertson,et al.  Neuropsychological contributions to theories of part/whole organization , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.