Online Recovery Guarantees and Analytical Results for OMP

Orthogonal Matching Pursuit (OMP) is a simple, yet empirically competitive algorithm for sparse recovery. Recent developments have shown that OMP guarantees exact recovery of K-sparse signals with K or more than K iterations if the observation matrix satisfies the restricted isometry property (RIP) with some conditions. We develop RIP-based online guarantees for recovery of a K-sparse signal with more than K OMP iterations. Though these guarantees cannot be generalized to all sparse signals a priori, we show that they can still hold online when the state-of-the-art K-step recovery guarantees fail. In addition, we present bounds on the number of correct and false indices in the support estimate for the derived condition to be less restrictive than the K-step guarantees. Under these bounds, this condition guarantees exact recovery of a K-sparse signal within 3K/2 iterations, which is much less than the number of steps required for the state-of-the-art exact recovery guarantees with more than K steps. Moreover, we present phase transitions of OMP in comparison to basis pursuit and subspace pursuit, which are obtained after extensive recovery simulations involving different sparse signal types. Finally, we empirically analyse the number of false indices in the support estimate, which indicates that these do not violate the developed upper bound in practice.

[1]  Hakan Erdogan,et al.  A* orthogonal matching pursuit: Best-first search for compressed sensing signal recovery , 2010, Digit. Signal Process..

[2]  Stephen J. Wright,et al.  Computational Methods for Sparse Solution of Linear Inverse Problems , 2010, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[3]  Mike E. Davies,et al.  Iterative Hard Thresholding for Compressed Sensing , 2008, ArXiv.

[4]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Structured Compressed Sensing: From Theory to Applications , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[5]  Emmanuel J. Cand The Restricted Isometry Property and Its Implications for Compressed Sensing , 2008 .

[6]  Michael A. Saunders,et al.  Atomic Decomposition by Basis Pursuit , 1998, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[7]  Hakan Erdogan,et al.  Compressed sensing signal recovery via forward-backward pursuit , 2012, Digit. Signal Process..

[8]  Jian Wang,et al.  Improved Recovery Bounds of Orthogonal Matching Pursuit using Restricted Isometry Property , 2012, ArXiv.

[9]  Michael B. Wakin,et al.  Analysis of Orthogonal Matching Pursuit Using the Restricted Isometry Property , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[10]  Mike E. Davies,et al.  Stagewise Weak Gradient Pursuits , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[11]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  Near-Optimal Signal Recovery From Random Projections: Universal Encoding Strategies? , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[12]  Simon Foucart,et al.  Stability and Robustness of Weak Orthogonal Matching Pursuits , 2012 .

[13]  E. Candès The restricted isometry property and its implications for compressed sensing , 2008 .

[14]  M. Rudelson,et al.  Sparse reconstruction by convex relaxation: Fourier and Gaussian measurements , 2006, 2006 40th Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems.

[15]  Arian Maleki,et al.  Optimally Tuned Iterative Reconstruction Algorithms for Compressed Sensing , 2009, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[16]  J. Tropp,et al.  CoSaMP: Iterative signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate samples , 2008, Commun. ACM.

[17]  Mike E. Davies,et al.  Gradient Pursuits , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[18]  Olgica Milenkovic,et al.  Subspace Pursuit for Compressive Sensing Signal Reconstruction , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[19]  Hakan Erdogan,et al.  A comparison of termination criteria for A∗OMP , 2012, 2012 Proceedings of the 20th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO).

[20]  Joel A. Tropp,et al.  Greed is good: algorithmic results for sparse approximation , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[21]  Y. C. Pati,et al.  Orthogonal matching pursuit: recursive function approximation with applications to wavelet decomposition , 1993, Proceedings of 27th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers.

[22]  Volkan Cevher,et al.  Model-Based Compressive Sensing , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[23]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  Matching pursuits with time-frequency dictionaries , 1993, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[24]  Jian Wang,et al.  On the Recovery Limit of Sparse Signals Using Orthogonal Matching Pursuit , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[25]  Joel A. Tropp,et al.  Signal Recovery From Random Measurements Via Orthogonal Matching Pursuit , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[26]  Sundeep Rangan,et al.  Orthogonal Matching Pursuit From Noisy Random Measurements: A New Analysis , 2009, NIPS.

[27]  Jian Wang,et al.  Generalized Orthogonal Matching Pursuit , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[28]  Deanna Needell,et al.  Signal Recovery From Incomplete and Inaccurate Measurements Via Regularized Orthogonal Matching Pursuit , 2007, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[29]  Deanna Needell,et al.  CoSaMP: Iterative signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate samples , 2008, ArXiv.

[30]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  Decoding by linear programming , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[31]  Tong Zhang,et al.  Sparse Recovery With Orthogonal Matching Pursuit Under RIP , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.