Which types of firm use collaborative innovative spaces?

[1]  D. Doloreux,et al.  Does location matter? STI and DUI innovation modes in different geographic settings , 2022, Technovation.

[2]  Artur Lapidus,et al.  Organizational Sustainability Identity: ‘New Work’ of Home Offices and Coworking Spaces as Facilitators , 2022, Sustainable Technology and Entrepreneurship.

[3]  Travis Howell.  Coworking spaces: An overview and research agenda , 2022, Research Policy.

[4]  R. Suire,et al.  Anatomy of a techno-creative community – the role of brokers, places, and events in the emergence of projection mapping in Nantes , 2021, European Planning Studies.

[5]  P. Cohendet,et al.  Reconsidering the dynamics of local knowledge creation: Middlegrounds and local innovation commons in the case of FabLabs , 2021, Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsgeographie.

[6]  J. Berbegal‐Mirabent.  What Do We Know about Co-Working Spaces? Trends and Challenges Ahead , 2021, Sustainability.

[7]  J. Hervás-Oliver,et al.  Technological innovation typologies and open innovation in SMEs: Beyond internal and external sources of knowledge , 2021 .

[8]  E. Lhoste.  Can do-it-yourself laboratories open up the science, technology, and innovation research system to civil society? , 2020 .

[9]  B. Szostak.  From Territorialised Innovation to Collaborative Innovation Space: What Are the Issues for Contemporary Organisations? , 2020, Journal of Innovation Economics & Management.

[10]  T. Gim,et al.  Does virtual discussion of a retail space affect the economic outcomes of the retail stores? The dynamics among retail environment, economic performances, and the perceived characteristics of the traditional retail markets by bloggers in Seoul , 2020 .

[11]  R. Hu.  COVID-19, smart work, and collaborative space: A crisis-opportunity perspective , 2020, Journal of Urban Management.

[12]  Jaime Teevan,et al.  The effects of remote work on collaboration among information workers , 2020, Nature Human Behaviour.

[13]  Nadia Zahoor,et al.  Inter-organizational collaboration and SMEs’ innovation: A systematic review and future research directions , 2020, Scandinavian Journal of Management.

[14]  S. Kraus,et al.  Coworking spaces: Empowerment for entrepreneurship and innovation in the digital and sharing economy , 2020, Journal of Business Research.

[15]  A. Petruzzelli,et al.  Implementing open innovation through virtual brand communities: A case study analysis in the semiconductor industry , 2020 .

[16]  Zoë B. Cullen,et al.  How are Small Businesses Adjusting to Covid-19? Early Evidence from a Survey , 2020, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[17]  Marine Agogué,et al.  Exploring Practices in Collaborative Innovation: Unpacking Dynamics, Relations, and Enactment in In‐Between Spaces , 2020 .

[18]  Marta Caccamo,et al.  Leveraging Innovation Spaces to Foster Collaborative Innovation , 2020 .

[19]  L. Morel,et al.  Collaborative Spaces Promoting Creativity and Innovation , 2020 .

[20]  Mirko Meboldt,et al.  Corporate makerspaces as innovation driver in companies: a literature review-based framework , 2019, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management.

[21]  Amadou Lô,et al.  Unsilencing power dynamics within third spaces. The case of Renault’s Fab Lab , 2019, Scandinavian Journal of Management.

[22]  Justin Paul,et al.  Does organizational structure facilitate inbound and outbound open innovation in SMEs? , 2019, Small Business Economics.

[23]  Mauricio Camargo,et al.  Design and Management of Innovation Laboratories: Toward a Performance Assessment Tool , 2019, Creativity and Innovation Management.

[24]  Hans Koller,et al.  Open radar groups: The integration of online communities into open foresight processes , 2019, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[25]  R. Suire.  Innovating by bricolage: how do firms diversify through knowledge interactions with FabLabs? , 2018, Regional Studies.

[26]  Richard Shearmur,et al.  Variety in external knowledge sourcing and innovation novelty: Evidence from the KIBS sector in Spain , 2017 .

[27]  Anu Wadhwa,et al.  The Paradox of Openness and Value Protection Strategies: Effect of Extramural R&D on Innovative Performance , 2017, Organ. Sci..

[28]  Verena Brinks,et al.  Open Creative Labs: Spatial Settings at the Intersection of Communities and Organizations , 2017 .

[29]  Benoît Godin,et al.  Technological Innovation: On the Origins and Development of an Inclusive Concept , 2016, Technology and culture.

[30]  Anna Yström,et al.  Exploring Design Principles of Organizing for Collaborative Innovation: The Case of an Open Innovation Initiative , 2016 .

[31]  Ioanna Lykourentzou,et al.  Innovation Labs: Leveraging Openness for Radical Innovation? , 2016 .

[32]  S. Brunswicker,et al.  Open Innovation in Small and Medium‐Sized Enterprises (SMEs): External Knowledge Sourcing Strategies and Internal Organizational Facilitators , 2015 .

[33]  L. Parrino.  Coworking: assessing the role of proximity in knowledge exchange , 2015 .

[34]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Ready to Be Open? Explaining the Firm-Level Barriers to Benefiting from Openness to External Knowledge , 2015 .

[35]  Stoyan V. Sgourev.  How Paris Gave Rise to Cubism (and Picasso): Ambiguity and Fragmentation in Radical Innovation , 2013, Organ. Sci..

[36]  G. Marchi,et al.  Extending lead-user theory to online brand communities: The case of the community Ducati , 2011 .

[37]  J. Füller,et al.  Triggers for virtual customer integration in the development of medical equipment — From a manufacturer and a user's perspective , 2010 .

[38]  K. Hölzle,et al.  Virtual Communities for Innovation: Influence Factors and Impact on Company Innovation , 2010 .

[39]  D. Gann,et al.  How open is innovation , 2010 .

[40]  Vivian Loftness,et al.  Workplace Collaborative Space Layout Typology and Occupant Perception of Collaboration Environment , 2010 .

[41]  A. Isaksen,et al.  Regions, networks and innovative performance: The case of knowledge-intensive industries in Norway , 2010 .

[42]  P. Cohendet,et al.  The Anatomy of the Creative City , 2010 .

[43]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  INNOVATION OBJECTIVES, KNOWLEDGE SOURCES, AND THE BENEFITS OF BREADTH , 2010 .

[44]  K. Birdi,et al.  Innovation Labs: An Examination into the Use of Physical Spaces to Enhance Organizational Creativity , 2009 .

[45]  F. Castellacci.  Technological paradigms, regimes and trajectories: Manufacturing and service industries in a new taxonomy of sectoral patterns of innovation , 2008 .

[46]  P. Nambisan,et al.  How to Profit From a Better ¿Virtual Customer Environment¿ , 2008 .

[47]  Richard Shearmur,et al.  Do Local Factors Explain Local Employment Growth? Evidence from Canada, 1971–2001 , 2007 .

[48]  Nuria González-Álvarez,et al.  APPROPRIABILITY OF INNOVATION RESULTS: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY IN SPANISH MANUFACTURING FIRMS , 2007 .

[49]  J. Moultrie,et al.  Innovation Spaces: Towards a Framework for Understanding the Role of the Physical Environment in Innovation , 2007 .

[50]  Beth A. Bechky,et al.  It's More Than a Desk: Working Smarter through Leveraged Office Design , 2007 .

[51]  Réjean Landry,et al.  Lessons from Innovation Empirical Studies in the Manufacturing Sector: A Systematic Review of the Literature from 1993-2003 , 2006 .

[52]  A. Venables,et al.  Buzz: face-to-face contact and the urban economy , 2004 .

[53]  Ann Lantz,et al.  Meetings in a distributed group of experts: Comparing face-to-face, chat and collaborative virtual environments , 2001, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[54]  Ulrike de Brentani.  Innovative versus incremental new business services : Different keys for achieving success , 2001 .

[55]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .