The influence of project autonomy on project success

Abstract In this article, we address the following research questions: (1) What is project autonomy, how can it be measured, and how much autonomy is given in NPD projects? (2) Does project autonomy increase with project innovativeness? (3) Is project autonomy positively related to success of NPD projects? (4) Does the positive relationship between project autonomy and project success increase with innovativeness of NDP projects? Theses hypotheses are tested using a sample of 104 highly innovative NPD projects, gathered in the first wave of the research project INNOVATION COMPASS. The results show that instruments which are advocated in the mainstream innovation and venture management literature are more frequently used with increasing innovativeness. However, they do not increase success of NPD projects, even not for highly innovative ones. Instruments derived from the organizational behavior tradition are not used more often with increasing innovativeness, but they do significantly improve NPD project success, particularly for very innovative ones. We conclude: Firms should not easily follow fashions, which are derived from prominent case studies. Rather, they should also take into account possible negative consequences of the recommendations. Researchers should lay more stress in discussing and empirically analyzing negative effects of popular recommendations.

[1]  P. Papastathopoulou,et al.  An empirically‐based typology of product innovativeness for new financial services: Success and failure scenarios , 2001 .

[2]  David M. Szymanski,et al.  Why Some New Products are More Successful than Others , 2001 .

[3]  Erwin Danneels,et al.  Product innovativeness from the firm's perspective: Its dimensions and their relation with project selection and performance , 2001 .

[4]  Steven C. Wheelwright,et al.  Revolutionizing product development , 1992 .

[5]  Lynda Aiman-Smith,et al.  Assessing a multidimensional measure of radical technological innovation , 1995 .

[6]  Axel Johne,et al.  Auditing product innovation activities in manufacturing firms , 1988 .

[7]  M. Hoegl,et al.  When teamwork really matters: task innovativeness as a moderator of the teamwork–performance relationship in software development projects , 2003 .

[8]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Disruptive Technologies: Catching the Wave , 1995 .

[9]  John H. Friar,et al.  Factors for success in R&D projects and new product innovation: a contextual framework , 1997 .

[10]  D. Gerwin,et al.  Withdrawal of team autonomy during concurrent engineering , 1997 .

[11]  Martin K. Starr,et al.  Corporate venturing: Creating new business within the firm , 1993 .

[12]  H. Ernst.  Success Factors of New Product Development: A Review of the Empirical Literature , 2002 .

[13]  Robert A. Burgelman.  Managing the Internal Corporate Venturing Process , 1984 .

[14]  G. Barczak.  New product strategy, structure, process, and performance in the telecommunications industry , 1995 .

[15]  Jay R. Galbraith.  Designing the Innovating Organization , 1982 .

[16]  B. N. Baker,et al.  Determinants of project success , 1974 .

[17]  C. Markides,et al.  Responses to disruptive strategic innovation , 2003 .

[18]  Robert A. Burgelman.  Designs for Corporate Entrepreneurship in Established Firms , 1984 .

[19]  Rosanna Garcia,et al.  A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: a literature review , 2002 .

[20]  Robert A. Burgelman.  Managing the new venture division: Research findings and implications for strategic management , 1985 .

[21]  R. Calantone,et al.  Determinants of New Product Performance: A Review and Meta-Analysis , 1994 .

[22]  Fabian Billing.  Koordination in radikalen Innovationsvorhaben , 2003 .

[23]  R. Calantone,et al.  Organisational, Technical and Marketing Antecedents for Successful New Product Development , 1993 .

[24]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Meeting the Challenge of Disruptive Change , 2000 .

[25]  Zenas Block,et al.  Corporate Venturing: Creating New Businesses Within the Firm , 1993 .

[26]  Robert J. Might,et al.  The role of structural factors in determining project management success , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[27]  M. Hoegl,et al.  Team member proximity and teamwork in innovative projects , 2004 .

[28]  Peter W. G. Morris,et al.  The Anatomy of Major Projects , 1987 .

[29]  M. Hoegl,et al.  Teamwork Quality and the Success of Innovative Projects , 2001 .

[30]  Trudy Heller,et al.  Loosely Coupled Systems for Corporate Entrepreneurship : Imagining and Managing the Innovation Project/Host Organization Interface , 1999 .

[31]  S. Gopalakrishnan,et al.  Theories of organizational structure and innovation adoption: the role of environmental change , 1998 .

[32]  Oskar Grün,et al.  Taming Giant Projects: Management of Multi-Organization Enterprises , 2004 .

[33]  Allan Afuah,et al.  Innovation Management: Strategies, Implementation, and Profits , 1997 .

[34]  R. Calantone,et al.  New Product Activities and Performance: The Moderating Role of Environmental Hostility , 1997 .

[35]  Hans-Georg Gemünden,et al.  Interteam Coordination, Project Commitment, and Teamwork in Multiteam R&D Projects: A Longitudinal Study , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[36]  Sören Salomo,et al.  Konzept und Messung des Innovationsgrades – Ergebnisse einer empirischen Studie zu innovativen Entwicklungsvorhaben , 2003 .