Shape and material optimization using gradient methods and the adjoint problem in time and frequency domain

Purpose: Shape and material parameters have major influence on the performance of electromagnetic components. Optimization of these parameters is therefore vital in electromagnetic design. Reduction of the radar cross section (RCS) for aircraft and frequency selective surfaces are two well known examples. Shape and materials optimization is performed for different scatterers in 2D. Design/methodology/approach: Continuum design sensitivities for microwave problems are applied for the gradient-based optimization of scatterers' shape and material parameters. The goal function is chosen to be an average of the monostatic RCS for a sector of incident angles over a frequency band. Numerical tests are presented for 2D scatterers and, specifically, a perfectly electrically conducting scatterer and an absorber on the front edge of an airplane wing are considered. The results are compared with theoretical findings and results in the open literature. Findings: It is demonstrated that a dense frequency sampling of the goal function over a wide frequency band relaxes the requirements on the angular resolution. The broad band requirements on the RCS also avoids corrugations without the resorting to regularization methods and penalty terms added to the goal function. The optimization algorithm refines, in a small number of iterations, the initial geometry of the scatterer to an optimized design with strongly reduced RCS. Originality/value: Shape and material parameters have major influence on the performance of electromagnetic components. Optimization of these parameters for scatterers demonstrates that a densely evaluated goal function over a broad frequency band has the advantages of: lowering the requirements on angular resolution; avoiding corrugations; and regularizing the problem by the broad frequency band requirements which often are naturally included in the performance specification of electromagnetic devices.

[1]  V. K. Madisetti,et al.  Constrained multitrack RLL codes for the storage channel , 1995 .

[2]  Thomas Rylander,et al.  Stability of Explicit-Implicit Hybrid Time-Stepping Schemes for Maxwell's Equations , 2002 .

[3]  C. Balanis Advanced Engineering Electromagnetics , 1989 .

[4]  Martin Nilsson,et al.  A Minimal Residual Interpolation Method for Linear Equations with Multiple Right-Hand Sides , 2004, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[5]  Jean-Pierre Berenger,et al.  A perfectly matched layer for the absorption of electromagnetic waves , 1994 .

[6]  A. Jameson Optimum aerodynamic design using CFD and control theory , 1995 .

[7]  Se-Hee Lee,et al.  Derivation of a general sensitivity formula for shape optimization of 2-D magnetostatic systems by continuum approach , 2002 .

[8]  Park Il-han,et al.  Sensitivity analysis based on analytic approach for shape optimization of electromagnetic devices: interface problem of iron and air , 1991 .

[9]  Young-Seek Chung,et al.  Optimal shape design of microwave device using FDTD and design sensitivity analysis , 2000, IMS 2000.

[10]  Jon P. Webb Design sensitivity of frequency response in 3-D finite-element analysis of microwave devices , 2002 .

[11]  R. Mittra,et al.  Computational Methods for Electromagnetics , 1997 .

[12]  Jian-Ming Jin,et al.  The Finite Element Method in Electromagnetics , 1993 .

[13]  A. Bondeson,et al.  Shape optimization for radar cross sections by a gradient method , 2004 .

[14]  Jon P. Webb,et al.  Design sensitivities for scattering-matrix calculation with tetrahedral edge elements , 2000 .

[15]  Jon P. Webb,et al.  Optimization of microwave devices using 3-D finite elements and the design sensitivity of the frequency response , 2003 .

[16]  J. Nédélec Mixed finite elements in ℝ3 , 1980 .

[17]  Panos Y. Papalambros,et al.  Principles of Optimal Design: Author Index , 2000 .

[18]  William H. Press,et al.  Book-Review - Numerical Recipes in Pascal - the Art of Scientific Computing , 1989 .

[19]  M. Bakr,et al.  Sensitivity analysis with the FDTD method on structured grids , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[20]  Tatsuo Itoh,et al.  A systematic optimum design of waveguide-to-microstrip transition , 1997 .

[21]  A sensitivity analysis using boundary element method for shape optimization of electromagnetic devices , 1992 .

[22]  William H. Press,et al.  The Art of Scientific Computing Second Edition , 1998 .

[23]  Allen Taflove,et al.  Computational Electrodynamics the Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method , 1995 .

[24]  Jian-Ming Jin,et al.  Fast and Efficient Algorithms in Computational Electromagnetics , 2001 .

[25]  Y. Rahmat-Samii,et al.  Particle swarm optimization in electromagnetics , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[26]  Young-Seek Chung,et al.  Optimal design method for microwave device using time domain method and design sensitivity analysis. II. FDTD case , 2001 .

[27]  E. M. Freeman,et al.  A method of computing the sensitivity of electromagnetic quantities to changes in materials and sources , 1994 .

[28]  Hao Wang,et al.  Introduction to Genetic Algorithms in Electromagnetics , 1995 .

[29]  C. Cheon,et al.  Shape optimization of H-plane waveguide tee junction using edge finite element method , 1995 .