Selection of Priority Areas for Fish Conservation in Guadiana River Basin, Iberian Peninsula

We developed a species-by-species approach for selecting protected areas for conservation of native freshwater fishes in semiarid regions, with catchment as the fundamental landscape unit for conservation efforts. Input data were composed of occurrences of freshwater fishes and landscape variables, and general quantification of occurrence, abundance, and endemicity of each fish species, to derive an index of conser- vation value for each species. Probability of occurrence of each species was performed with logistic-regression analysis based on the landscape variables and extrapolated to the entire study area with a geographic infor- mation system. We estimated the conservation value of a stream reach by summing the predicted probability of occurrence of each species multiplied by its corresponding conservation value. To define and select reserves, we used a threshold that maximizes conservation value of the stream reaches but identifies the minimum number of reaches for protection. The approach was applied to native freshwater fishes in the Guadiana River basin (southern Iberian Peninsula), which are threatened by the construction of two major dams. We used the data from 1 sampling year (1999) to produce the models, which were validated based on data collected in 2000 and 2001. We used variables of climate (3), geomorphology (4), hydrology (7), and human influence (6) to build the predictive models, which revealed that native species occur over a wide range of riverine habitats, with stream order and location in the basin the most frequently selected variables. The conservation value of species varied considerably, with Anaecypris hispanica the highest-ranked species. The catchments selected for reserves were the mainstream of the Guadiana River (upstream and downstream of the Alqueva and Pedrog˜ reservoirs) and the Degebe, Ardila, and Enxocatchments. Our approach is a pragmatic way to address the urgent need to protect Guadiana native fish species in light of the ongoing anthropogenic degradation of aquatic environments.

[1]  I. Cowx,et al.  Threats imposed by water resource development schemes on the conservation of endangered fish species in the Guadiana River Basin in Portugal , 2000 .

[2]  M. Brunke,et al.  The ecological significance of exchange processes between rivers and groundwater , 1997 .

[3]  J. Kerr.  Species Richness, Endemism, and the Choice of Areas for Conservation , 1997 .

[4]  P. Legendre.  Spatial Autocorrelation: Trouble or New Paradigm? , 1993 .

[5]  J. Allan,et al.  The influence of catchment land use on stream integrity across multiple spatial scales , 1997 .

[6]  R. Norris,et al.  What is river health , 1999 .

[7]  C. K. Minns.  A method of ranking species and sites for conservation using presence-absence data and its application to native freshwater fish in New Zealand , 1987 .

[8]  V. Resh,et al.  Streams in Mediterranean Climate Regions: Abiotic Influences and Biotic Responses to Predictable Seasonal Events , 1999 .

[9]  J. Meeuwig,et al.  Freshwater Protected Areas: Strategies for Conservation , 2002, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[10]  Octávio S. Paulo,et al.  Modelling wildlife distributions: Logistic Multiple Regression vs Overlap Analysis , 1999 .

[11]  Ian G. Cowx,et al.  Spatial modelling of freshwater fish in semi‐arid river systems: a tool for conservation , 2002 .

[12]  M. Wiley,et al.  Influence of Tributary Spatial Position on the Structure of Warmwater Fish Communities , 1992 .

[13]  P. Moyle,et al.  Protection of Aquatic Biodiversity in California: A Five-tiered Approach , 1994 .

[14]  Stuart Gage,et al.  Landscape approaches to the analysis of aquatic ecosystems , 1997 .

[15]  F. Rabe,et al.  A methodology for the selection of aquatic natural areas , 1979 .

[16]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[17]  A. Arthington,et al.  Discharge variability and the development of predictive models relating stream fish assemblage structure to habitat in northeastern Australia , 2000 .

[18]  R. Naiman,et al.  The Role of Riparian Corridors in Maintaining Regional Biodiversity. , 1993, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[19]  J. Allan,et al.  Functional Organization of Stream Fish Assemblages in Relation to Hydrological Variability , 1995 .

[20]  I. Cowx,et al.  Life history traits of the endangered iberian cyprinid Anaecypris hispanica and their implications for conservation , 2000 .

[21]  P. Maitland.  Criteria for the selection of important sites for freshwater fish in the British isles , 1985 .

[22]  I. Schlosser,et al.  Stream Fish Ecology: A Landscape PerspectiveLand use, which influences the terrestrial-aquatic interface, can affect fish populations and their community dynamics , 1991 .

[23]  J. Lawton,et al.  The Gaps between Theory and Practice in Selecting Nature Reserves , 1999 .

[24]  Casimiro Corbacho,et al.  Patterns of species richness and introduced species in native freshwater fish faunas of a Mediterranean‐type basin: the Guadiana River (southwest Iberian Peninsula) , 2001 .

[25]  Jean-François Guégan,et al.  Global scale patterns of fish species richness in rivers , 1995 .

[26]  M. M. Coelho,et al.  Seasonal changes in fish community structure of intermittent streams in the middle reaches of the Guadiana basin, Portugal , 1999 .

[27]  David W. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .

[28]  Luis A. Bojórquez-Tapia,et al.  Identifying Conservation Priorities in Mexico Through Geographic Information Systems and Modeling , 1995 .

[29]  K. Wilson,et al.  Boundaries and Corridors as a Continuum of Ecological Flow Control: Lessons from Rivers and Streams , 2001 .

[30]  M. Araújo,et al.  Apples, Oranges, and Probabilities: Integrating Multiple Factors into Biodiversity Conservation with Consistency , 2002 .

[31]  M. Paller.  Relationships between Fish Assemblage Structure and Stream Order in South Carolina Coastal Plain Streams , 1994 .

[32]  W. J. Matthews,et al.  Patterns in Freshwater Fish Ecology , 1998, Springer US.

[33]  Denis White,et al.  Environmental correlates of species richness for native freshwater fish in Oregon, U.S.A. , 1999 .

[34]  R. Haight,et al.  A Regional Landscape Analysis and Prediction of Favorable Gray Wolf Habitat in the Northern Great Lakes Region , 1995 .

[35]  J. Michael Scott,et al.  Predicting Species Occurrences: Issues of Accuracy and Scale , 2002 .

[36]  Paul G. R. Smith,et al.  Evaluating natural areas using multiple criteria: Theory and practice , 1987 .

[37]  Paul L. Angermeier,et al.  The Natural Imperative for Biological Conservation , 2000 .

[38]  Paul L. Angermeier,et al.  Assessing conservation value using centers of population density , 1995 .

[39]  Robert L. Pressey,et al.  Efficiency in conservation evaluation: Scoring versus iterative approaches , 1989 .

[40]  Robert L. Pressey,et al.  A Comparison of Richness Hotspots, Rarity Hotspots, and Complementary Areas for Conserving Diversity of British Birds , 1996 .

[41]  P. Angermeier,et al.  characterizing fish community diversity across virginia landscapes: prerequisite for conservation , 1999 .

[42]  David M. Rosenberg,et al.  Collaboration in scientific research: a critical need for freshwater ecology , 1999 .

[43]  S. Sarkar,et al.  Systematic conservation planning , 2000, Nature.

[44]  Robert L. Pressey,et al.  Reserve Selection in a Species‐Rich and Fragmented Landscape on the Agulhas Plain, South Africa , 1997 .

[45]  Miguel B. Araújo,et al.  Selecting areas for species persistence using occurrence data , 2000 .

[46]  M. Collares-Pereira,et al.  Gradients in stream fish assemblages across a Mediterranean landscape: contributions of environmental factors and spatial structure , 2002 .