QT Interval and QT Dispersion Measured with the Threshold Method Depend on Threshold Level

Various computerized methods with multiple parameter options for measurements of the QT interval now are available. The optimum parameter setting for most algorithms is not known. This study evaluated the influence of the threshold level applied on the T wave differential on the QT interval and its dispersion measured in normal and abnormal electrocardiograms (ECGs). Seven hundred sixty ECGs recorded in 76 normal subjects and 630 in 63 patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) (10 consecutive recordings in each individual) were analyzed. In each lead of each ECG, the QT interval was measured by the threshold method applied to the first differential of the T wave. The threshold level was varied between 5% and 30% of the T wave maximum in 1% steps, resulting in 26 different choices of QT measurements. With each choice the maximum QTc and the QT dispersion (QTd, standard deviation of the QT in all 12 leads) were obtained for each recording. The maximum QTc was significantly longer in HCM patients than in normal subjects (P < 0.001) at all threshold levels except between 5% and 7%. The QTd was significantly greater in HCM patients at all threshold levels. The QTc and QTd changed significantly with the threshold level. The maximum QTc varied up to 60 ms in normal subjects and up to 70 ms in HCM patients, depending on the threshold level. Thus, the QT intervai and its dispersion measured with the threshold method applied to the first T wave differential depended significantly on the threshold level in both normal and diseased hearts. All programmable options of available automatic instruments should be examined carefully before any study, and all algorithmic details should be systematically presented.

[1]  A Murray,et al.  Accuracy of four automatic QT measurement techniques in cardiac patients and healthy subjects. , 1996, Heart.

[2]  B Maisch,et al.  Report of the 1995 World Health Organization/International Society and Federation of Cardiology Task Force on the Definition and Classification of cardiomyopathies. , 1996, Circulation.

[3]  G. Bortolan,et al.  Validation of QT dispersion algorithms and some clinical investigations , 1996, Computers in Cardiology 1996.

[4]  Qiuzhen Xue,et al.  New algorithms for QT dispersion analysis , 1996, Computers in Cardiology 1996.

[5]  J. O'Donnell,et al.  Computer quantitation of Q-T and terminal T wave (aT-eT) intervals during exercise: methodology and results in normal men. , 1981, The American journal of cardiology.

[6]  B. Chaitman,et al.  QT interval measurement by a computer assisted program: a potentially useful clinical parameter. , 1982, Journal of electrocardiology.

[7]  A Nava,et al.  Comparison of QT dispersion in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy between patients with and without ventricular arrhythmias and sudden death. , 1993, The American journal of cardiology.

[8]  P. Davey,et al.  QT interval dispersion in chronic heart failure and left ventricular hypertrophy: relation to autonomic nervous system and Holter tape abnormalities. , 1994, British heart journal.

[9]  W. McKenna,et al.  Distribution of left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a two-dimensional echocardiographic study. , 1983, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  M Malik,et al.  Agreement and reproducibility of automatic versus manual measurement of QT interval and QT dispersion. , 1998, The American journal of cardiology.

[11]  B. Maron,et al.  Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a discussion of nomenclature. , 1979, The American journal of cardiology.