Surveillance of screening-detected cancers (colon and rectum, breast, and cervix) - United States, 2004-2006.

PROBLEM/CONDITION Population-based screening is conducted to detect diseases or other conditions in persons before symptoms appear; effective screening leads to early detection and treatment, thereby reducing disease-associated morbidity and mortality. Based on systematic reviews of the evidence of the benefits and harms and assessments of the net benefit of screening, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommends population-based screening for colon and rectum cancer, female breast cancer, and uterine cervix cancer. Few publications have used national data to examine the stage at diagnosis of these screening-amenable cancers. REPORTING PERIOD COVERED 2004-2006. DESCRIPTION OF SYSTEMS Data were obtained from cancer registries affiliated with CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR) and the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. Combined data from the NPCR and SEER programs provide the best source of information on national population-based cancer incidence. Data on cancer screening were obtained from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. This report provides stage-specific cancer incidence rates and screening prevalence by demographic characteristics and U.S. state. RESULTS Approximately half of colorectal and cervical cancer cases and one third of breast cancer cases were diagnosed at a late stage of disease. Incidence rates of late-stage cancer differed by age, race/ethnicity, and state. Incidence rates of late-stage colorectal cancer increased with age and were highest among black men and women. Incidence rates of late-stage breast cancer were highest among women aged 60-79 years and black women. Incidence rates of late-stage cervical cancer were highest among women aged 50-79 years and Hispanic women. The percentage of persons who received recommended screening differed by age, race/ethnicity, and state. INTERPRETATION Differences in late-stage cancer incidence rates might be explained partially by differences in screening use. PUBLIC HEALTH ACTION The findings in this report emphasize the need for ongoing population-based surveillance and reporting to monitor late-stage cancer incidence trends. Screening can identify colorectal, cervical, and breast cancers in earlier and more treatable stages of disease. Multiple factors, including individual characteristics and health behaviors as well as provider and clinical systems factors, might account for why certain populations are underscreened. Cancer control planners, including comprehensive cancer-control programs, can use late-stage cancer incidence and screening prevalence data to identify populations that would benefit from interventions to increase screening utilization and to monitor performance of early detection programs.

[1]  Adeyinka O Laiyemo,et al.  Race and colorectal cancer disparities: health-care utilization vs different cancer susceptibilities. , 2010, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[2]  R. Levine,et al.  Triangulating on success: innovation, public health, medical care, and cause-specific US mortality rates over a half century (1950-2000). , 2010, American journal of public health.

[3]  Howard K Koh,et al.  Promoting prevention through the Affordable Care Act. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  S. Taplin,et al.  Interfaces across the cancer continuum offer opportunities to improve the process of care. , 2010, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[5]  A. Spaar [Timely care after an abnormal mammogram among low-income women in a public breast cancer screening program]. , 2010, Praxis.

[6]  E. Feuer,et al.  SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2003 , 2006 .

[7]  Kim Krisberg Budget cuts straining capacity of public health departments: Services in demand , 2010 .

[8]  S. Devesa,et al.  Emerging and Widening Colorectal Carcinoma Disparities Between Blacks and Whites in the United States (1975-2002) , 2006, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[9]  A. Jemal,et al.  Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975‐2006, featuring colorectal cancer trends and impact of interventions (risk factors, screening, and treatment) to reduce future rates , 2010, Cancer.

[10]  Amy Leader,et al.  Is the Promise of Cancer-Screening Programs Being Compromised? Quality of Follow-Up Care after Abnormal Screening Results , 2003, Medical care research and review : MCRR.

[11]  N. Breen,et al.  Toward a system of cancer screening in the United States: trends and opportunities. , 2005, Annual review of public health.

[12]  Charles Wiggins,et al.  Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2004, featuring cancer in American Indians and Alaska Natives. , 2007, Cancer.

[13]  Roshan Bastani,et al.  Interventions to improve follow‐up of abnormal findings in cancer screening , 2004, Cancer.

[14]  Timothy J Wilt,et al.  Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. , 2009, Annals of internal medicine.

[15]  K. Stone State breast cancer screening programs struggle financially , 2010 .

[16]  R. Wender,et al.  Can the medical home reduce cancer morbidity and mortality? , 2009, Primary care.

[17]  Sun Hee Rim,et al.  Colorectal cancer incidence in the United States, 1999‐2004 , 2009, Cancer.

[18]  S. Lai,et al.  Rural/nonrural differences in colorectal cancer incidence in the United States, 1998–2001 , 2006, Cancer.

[19]  L. Seeff,et al.  Development of a Federally Funded Demonstration Colorectal Cancer Screening Program , 2008, Preventing chronic disease.

[20]  M. Plescia,et al.  Vital signs: breast cancer screening among women aged 50-74 years - United States, 2008. , 2010, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.

[21]  Rongwei Fu,et al.  Screening for Colorectal Cancer: A Targeted, Updated Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force , 2008, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[22]  N. Schenker,et al.  On Judging the Significance of Differences by Examining the Overlap Between Confidence Intervals , 2001 .

[23]  D E Nelson,et al.  Reliability and validity of measures from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). , 2001, Sozial- und Praventivmedizin.

[24]  D. Berry,et al.  Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer , 2005 .

[25]  Michelle L. Klosterman,et al.  Adherence with colorectal cancer screening guidelines: a review. , 2004, Preventive medicine.

[26]  L. Goldman,et al.  An Assessment of the Quality of Mammography Care at Facilities Treating Medically Vulnerable Populations , 2008, Medical care.

[27]  S. Coughlin,et al.  Burden of cervical cancer in the United States, 1998–2003 , 2008, Cancer.

[28]  J. Lave,et al.  NIH state-of-the-science conference statement: Enhancing use and quality of colorectal cancer screening. , 2010, NIH consensus and state-of-the-science statements.

[29]  Richard P. Moser,et al.  Adherence to cervical cancer screening guidelines for U.S. women aged 25-64: data from the 2005 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS). , 2009, Journal of women's health.

[30]  M. Gokhale,et al.  Predictors of timely follow‐up after abnormal cancer screening among women seeking care at urban community health centers , 2010, Cancer.

[31]  B. Rimer,et al.  Interventions to increase recommendation and delivery of screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers by healthcare providers systematic reviews of provider assessment and feedback and provider incentives. , 2008, American journal of preventive medicine.

[32]  A. Jerant,et al.  Determinants of racial/ethnic colorectal cancer screening disparities. , 2008, Archives of internal medicine.

[33]  R. Coates,et al.  Meeting the cervical cancer screening needs of underserved women: The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, 2004–2006 , 2010, Cancer Causes & Control.

[34]  N. Berkman,et al.  Timing of Colposcopy After Cervical Cytologic Abnormalities , 2010, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[35]  S. Lemon,et al.  Interventions for patients, providers, and health care organizations , 2004, Cancer.

[36]  Screening for cervical cancer: recommendations and rationale. , 2003, The American journal of nursing.

[37]  D. Makuc,et al.  Health, United States, 2009; with special feature on medical technology , 2010 .

[38]  D. Blumenthal,et al.  Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , 2010 .

[39]  Ram C Tiwari,et al.  Efficient interval estimation for age-adjusted cancer rates , 2006, Statistical methods in medical research.

[40]  Michael J Thun,et al.  Recent trends in breast cancer incidence rates by age and tumor characteristics among U.S. women , 2007, Breast Cancer Research.

[41]  B. Rimer,et al.  Client-directed Interventions to Increase Community Access to Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening a Systematic Review , 2022 .

[42]  Alecia M. Fair,et al.  Barriers to Diagnostic Resolution After Abnormal Mammography: A Review of the Literature , 2008, Cancer nursing.

[43]  Ahmedin Jemal,et al.  Annual Report to the Nation on the status of cancer, 1973–1999, featuring implications of age and aging on U.S. cancer burden , 2002, Cancer.

[44]  L. Balluz,et al.  Surveillance of certain health behaviors and conditions among states and selected local areas - Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, United States, 2007. , 2017, Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Surveillance summaries.

[45]  H M Rosenberg,et al.  Age standardization of death rates: implementation of the year 2000 standard. , 1998, National vital statistics reports : from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System.

[46]  J. Royalty,et al.  Timeliness of breast cancer diagnosis and initiation of treatment in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, 1996-2005. , 2010, American journal of public health.

[47]  A. Polednak Trends in late-stage breast, cervical and colorectal cancers in blacks and whites. , 2000, Ethnicity & disease.

[48]  J. Cuzick,et al.  Screening for cervical cancer , 1998, The Lancet.

[49]  D. Saslow,et al.  Cancer Screening in the United States, 2010: A Review of Current American Cancer Society Guidelines and Issues in Cancer Screening , 2010, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[50]  Gerhard Jentzsch,et al.  Working group on , 1991 .

[51]  P. Trott,et al.  International Classification of Diseases for Oncology , 1977 .

[52]  M. Plescia,et al.  Vital signs: colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 50-75 years - United States, 2008. , 2010, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.

[53]  H. Nelson,et al.  Screening for Breast Cancer: An Update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force , 2009, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[54]  Charles F. Lynch,et al.  Quality of race, Hispanic ethnicity, and immigrant status in population-based cancer registry data: implications for health disparity studies , 2007, Cancer Causes & Control.

[55]  Nancy Breen,et al.  Progress in cancer screening practices in the United States , 2003, Cancer.

[56]  Patricia Dolan Mullen,et al.  Client-directed interventions to increase community demand for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening a systematic review. , 2008, American journal of preventive medicine.