Assessing the acquisition of requesting a variety of preferred items using different speech generating device formats for children with autism spectrum disorder

ABSTRACT Five children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) were taught to request preferred items using four different augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) displays on an iPad®-based speech-generating device (SGD). Acquisition was compared using multi-element designs. Displays included a symbol-based grid, a photo image with embedded hotspots, a hybrid (photo image with embedded hotspots and symbols), and a pop-up symbol grid. Three participants mastered requesting items from a field of four with at least three displays, and one mastered requesting items in a field of two. The fifth participant did not acquire requests in a field of preferred items. Individualized display effects were present, and the photo image appeared to have provided the most consistent advantages for three participants. Some errors were more or less common with specific displays and/or participants. The results have important implications for AAC assessment and implementation protocols.

[1]  Jennifer Abramson,et al.  Applying Technology to Visually Support Language and Communication in Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorders , 2012, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[2]  M. O'Reilly,et al.  Comparing Acquisition of AAC-Based Mands in Three Young Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder Using iPad® Applications with Different Display and Design Elements , 2014, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders.

[3]  S. Sparrow,et al.  Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales , 2020, Definitions.

[4]  Kathryn D R Drager,et al.  Learning of dynamic display AAC technologies by typically developing 3-year-olds: effect of different layouts and menu approaches. , 2004, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[5]  Rajinder Koul,et al.  Use of iPad/iPods with Individuals with Autism and other Developmental Disabilities: A Meta-analysis of Communication Interventions , 2014 .

[6]  Terry S. Falcomata,et al.  Evaluation of a pre-treatment assessment to select mand topographies for functional communication training. , 2009, Research in developmental disabilities.

[7]  B. Iwata,et al.  Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences. , 1996, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[8]  Angel Fettig,et al.  Evidence-Based Practices for Children, Youth, and Young Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Comprehensive Review , 2015, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[9]  C. Drew Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales , 2010 .

[10]  M. O'Reilly,et al.  Comparison of the predictive validity and consistency among preference assessment procedures: a review of the literature. , 2013, Research in developmental disabilities.

[11]  Craig H. Kennedy,et al.  Single-Case Designs for Educational Research , 2004 .

[12]  Lori Frost,et al.  The picture exchange communication system : training manual , 2002 .

[13]  I. DeLeon,et al.  The influence of matching and motor-imitation abilities on rapid acquisition of manual signs and exchange-based communicative responses. , 2009, Journal of applied behavior analysis.