Effect of stimulus spectrum on distance perception for nearby sources.

The effects of stimulus frequency and bandwidth on distance perception were examined for nearby sources in simulated reverberant space. Sources to the side [containing reverberation-related cues and interaural level difference (ILD) cues] and to the front (without ILDs) were simulated. Listeners judged the distance of noise bursts presented at a randomly roving level from simulated distances ranging from 0.15 to 1.7 m. Six stimuli were tested, varying in center frequency (300-5700 Hz) and bandwidth (200-5400 Hz). Performance, measured as the correlation between simulated and response distances, was worse for frontal than for lateral sources. For both simulated directions, performance was inversely proportional to the low-frequency stimulus cutoff, independent of stimulus bandwidth. The dependence of performance on frequency was stronger for frontal sources. These correlation results were well summarized by considering how mean response, as opposed to response variance, changed with stimulus direction and spectrum: (1) little bias was observed for lateral sources, but listeners consistently overestimated distance for frontal nearby sources; (2) for both directions, increasing the low-frequency cut-off reduced the range of responses. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that listeners used a direction-independent but frequency-dependent mapping of a reverberation-related cue, not the ILD cue, to judge source distance.

[1]  John R. Anderson,et al.  The dynamics of scaling: a memory-based anchor model of category rating and absolute identification. , 2005, Psychological review.

[2]  H. Ury,et al.  LARGE SAMPLE AND OTHER MULTIPLE COMPARISONS AMONG MEANS , 1971 .

[3]  Pavel Zahorik,et al.  Direct-to-reverberant energy ratio sensitivity. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  E. Galanter,et al.  Psychophysical Scaling ' " , 2006 .

[5]  M. Gardner Proximity image effect in sound localization. , 1968, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  N I Durlach,et al.  Intensity perception. XIII. Perceptual anchor model of context-coding. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  W. Hartmann Localization of sound in rooms. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  Matthew J Goupell,et al.  Interaural fluctuations and the detection of interaural incoherence. III. Narrowband experiments and binaural models. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  D. Brungart Auditory localization of nearby sources. III. Stimulus effects. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  A Parducci,et al.  The category effect with rating scales: number of categories, number of stimuli, and method of presentation. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  Brian R Glasberg,et al.  Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data , 1990, Hearing Research.

[12]  Nandini Iyer,et al.  On the minimum audible difference in direct-to-reverberant energy ratio. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  D. Mershon,et al.  Intensity and reverberation as factors in the auditory perception of egocentric distance , 1975 .

[14]  Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham,et al.  Localizing nearby sound sources in a classroom: binaural room impulse responses. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  Daniel H. Ashmead,et al.  Perception of the relative distances of nearby sound sources , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  A. Bronkhorst,et al.  Auditory distance perception in humans : A summary of past and present research , 2005 .

[17]  William M Hartmann,et al.  Interaural level differences and the level-meter model. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  Pavel Zahorik,et al.  Assessing auditory distance perception using virtual acoustics. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  M. Schroeder New Method of Measuring Reverberation Time , 1965 .

[20]  Simon Carlile,et al.  Virtual Auditory Space: Generation and Applications , 2013, Neuroscience Intelligence Unit.

[21]  N I Durlach,et al.  Intensity perception. I. Preliminary theory of intensity resolution. , 1969, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  W M Hartmann,et al.  Identification and localization of sound sources in the median sagittal plane. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  S. Parker,et al.  Top-down gain control in the auditory system: Evidence from identification and discrimination experiments , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[24]  R Y Litovsky,et al.  Use of sound-pressure level in auditory distance discrimination by 6-month-old infants and adults. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  Tammo Houtgast,et al.  Auditory distance perception in rooms , 1999, Nature.

[26]  Scott Santarelli,et al.  Localization of near-field sources in a reverberant room , 1998 .