Knowledge‐based resources, entrepreneurial orientation, and the performance of small and medium‐sized businesses

While theory suggests that management has discretion in manipulating resources in order to build competitive advantage, resource-based research has focused on the characteristics of resources, paying less attention to the relationship between those resources and the way firms are organized. In explaining performance, entrepreneurship scholars have focused on a firm’s entrepreneurial strategic orientation (EO), leaving its interrelationship with internal characteristics aside. We argue that EO captures an important aspect of the way a firm is organized. Our findings suggest that knowledge-based resources (applicable to discovery and exploitation of opportunities) are positively related to firm performance and that EO enhances this relationship. Copyright  2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  B. Chakravarthy,et al.  The persistence of knowledge‐based advantage: an empirical test for product performance and technological knowledge , 2002 .

[2]  Terrence E. Brown,et al.  An operationalization of Stevenson’s conceptualization of entrepreneurship as opportunity-based firm behavior , 2001 .

[3]  Rita Gunther McGrath Exploratory Learning, Innovative Capacity, and Managerial Oversight , 2001 .

[4]  M. Lindell,et al.  Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[5]  Constance E. Helfat Guest editor's introduction to the special issue: the evolution of firm capabilities , 2000 .

[6]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[7]  G. Hamel Leading the Revolution , 2000 .

[8]  Petra Christmann Effects of “Best Practices” of Environmental Management on Cost Advantage: The Role of Complementary Assets , 2000 .

[9]  S. Shane Prior Knowledge and the Discovery of Entrepreneurial Opportunities , 2000 .

[10]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  Knowledge flows within multinational corporations , 2000 .

[11]  S. Shane,et al.  The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research , 2000 .

[12]  Johan Wiklund The Sustainability of the Entrepreneurial Orientation—Performance Relationship , 1999 .

[13]  M. Tushman,et al.  Resource recombinations in the firm: knowledge structures and the potential for schumpeterian innovation , 1998 .

[14]  David J. Miller,et al.  The Resource-Based View of the Firm in Two Environments: The Hollywood Film Studios From 1936 to 1965 , 1996 .

[15]  Rita Gunther McGrath,et al.  Innovation, competitive advantage and rent: a model and test , 1996 .

[16]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking It To Performance , 1996 .

[17]  J. Barney Looking inside for competitive advantage , 1995 .

[18]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT: PAST RESEARCH, PRESENT FINDINGS, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS , 1995 .

[19]  S. Zahra,et al.  Contextual influences on the corporate entrepreneurship-performance relationship: A longitudinal analysis , 1995 .

[20]  I. Nonaka,et al.  How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation , 1995 .

[21]  Robert E. Hoskisson,et al.  Strategic Management: Competitiveness and Globalization , 1994 .

[22]  D. Storey Understanding the small business sector , 1994 .

[23]  E. Hippel Sticky Information and the Locus of Problem Solving: Implications for Innovation , 1994 .

[24]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Exploring the black box: Telecommunications: complex, uncertain, and path dependent , 1994 .

[25]  J. Barney Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[26]  John P. Robinson,et al.  Measures Of Personality And Social Psychological Attitudes , 1991 .

[27]  S. Birley,et al.  Growth and performance contrasts between ‘types’ of small firms , 1990 .

[28]  Danny Miller Organizational Configurations: Cohesion, Change, and Prediction , 1990 .

[29]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[30]  D. Slevin,et al.  Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments , 1989 .

[31]  Paul Israel,et al.  The Sources of Innovation , 1990 .

[32]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  Dimensions of Organizational Task Environments. , 1984 .

[33]  P. H. Friesen,et al.  Innovation in Conservative and Entrepreneurial Firms: Two Models of Strategic Momentum , 1982 .

[34]  Kim S. Cameron,et al.  Measuring Organizational Effectiveness in Institutions of Higher Education. , 1978 .

[35]  P. H. Friesen,et al.  Archetypes of Strategy Formulation , 1978 .

[36]  William J. Abernathy,et al.  Patterns of Industrial Innovation , 1978 .

[37]  S. Shapiro,et al.  An Analysis of Variance Test for Normality (Complete Samples) , 1965 .