Teaching and learning family and consumer sciences through K-W-L charts

While much of the control and many of the activities found in today’s classrooms have been placed in the hands of the learners and learning has become inquiry-based, there remains a need for teachers to use teaching tools that would facilitate this student-centered teaching process. This article identifies the K-W-L Chart as one such tool and follows a case study of four Kuwaiti ‘Family and Consumer Sciences’ teaching / learning events to evaluate their ability to enhance the learning outcomes of eight students. The research was designed from a qualitative, multi-tiered design approach and was assessed through a constant comparative method of data analysis of interview responses, classroom observations and worksheet-assessments. The results showed that the use of K-W-L Charts influenced the teachers and learners toward a more inquiry-based approach and facilitated a more student-centered and collaborative learning environment, raising the level of interest and the amount of personal input given by the students.

[1]  Janet Mannheimer Zydney.  The effect of multiple scaffolding tools on students' understanding, consideration of different perspectives, and misconceptions of a complex problem , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[2]  P. David Pearson.  Changing the face of reading comprehension instruction , 1985 .

[3]  D. Kolb.  Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development , 1983 .

[4]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Student study guide to accompany Creswell's Educational research : planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research /prepared by Vicki L. Plano Clark , 2008 .

[5]  Joke Voogt,et al.  Curriculum Reform and Teachers' Training Needs: The Case of Higher Education in Ghana , 2012 .

[6]  T. H. Quinn,et al.  Build a Human Project: Improving Attitude and Increasing Anatomy Content Knowledge and Skills for Middle-Level Students. , 2006 .

[7]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[8]  Cary J. Trexler,et al.  Constructivist teaching: developing constructivist approaches to the agricultural education class , 2005 .

[9]  B. Miri,et al.  Purposely Teaching for the Promotion of Higher-order Thinking Skills: A Case of Critical Thinking , 2007 .

[10]  Barry Fishman,et al.  Linking Teacher and Student Learning to Improve Professional Development in Systemic Reform. , 2003 .

[11]  J. Novak,et al.  Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View , 1969 .

[12]  Deborah A. Elliott,et al.  Word Detectives: Solving the Mystery of Vocabulary. , 2002 .

[13]  Soula Mitakidou,et al.  Engaging Learners in Cooperative Learning Through Environmental and Cross-Cultural Activities , 2011 .

[14]  Paulien C. Meijer,et al.  Understanding Teacher Learning in Secondary Education: The Relations of Teacher Activities to Changed Beliefs about Teaching and Learning. , 2009 .

[15]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Macrorules for summarizing texts: the development of expertise , 1983 .

[16]  Anwei Feng,et al.  Classroom observation protocol , 2013 .

[17]  Salley B. Sawyer.  Learning Theories and the Design of E-Learning Environments , 2005 .

[18]  Miles V. Zintz.  The reading process: The teacher and the learner , 1970 .

[19]  David Labaree.  On the Nature of Teaching and Teacher Education , 2000 .

[20]  Chet Meyers,et al.  Promoting Active Learning: Strategies for the College Classroom , 1993 .

[21]  Karen K. Wixson,et al.  Assessment and Instruction of Reading Disability: An Interactive Approach , 1991 .

[22]  Margaret G. McKeown,et al.  An Instructional Redesign of Reading Lessons: Effects on Comprehension. , 1982 .

[23]  Gillian Kidman,et al.  Enhancing the Teaching of Family and Consumer Sciences: The Role of Graphic Organisers , 2010 .

[24]  L. Idol.  Johnny Can't Read , 1988 .

[25]  Stephen M. Tonks,et al.  Developing Self-Regulated Readers through Instruction for Reading Engagement , 2011 .

[26]  Robert M. Gagné,et al.  The Conditions of Learning and Theory of Instruction , 1985 .

[27]  R. Weaver,et al.  Classroom Organization and Participation: College Students' Perceptions , 2005 .

[28]  Donna Ogle,et al.  K-W-L Plus: A Strategy for Comprehension and Summarization. , 1987 .

[29]  D. Camp.  It Takes Two: Teaching with Twin Texts of Fact and Fiction. , 2000 .

[30]  David E. Rumelhart,et al.  Toward an interactive model of reading. , 1994 .

[31]  Charlene M. Czerniak,et al.  Beliefs about Teaching Science: The relationship between elementary teachers’ participation in professional development and student achievement , 2012 .

[32]  Robert R. Weaver,et al.  Classroom Organization and Participation: College Students' Perceptions , 2005 .

[33]  Karen Hawkins.  Active Readers: Tools and Strategies for Comprehension (Upper Primary) [Book Review] , 2010 .

[34]  Jennifer A. Strangfeld.  Promoting Active Learning , 2013 .

[35]  T. Schmitt,et al.  Teacher efficacy in student engagement, instructional management, student stressors, and burnout: A theoretical model using in-class variables to predict teachers' intent-to-leave , 2012 .

[36]  E. Horwitz.  Psychology for Language Teachers: A Social Constructivist Approach , 2002 .

[37]  Richard C. Anderson.  The notion of schemata and the educational enterprise , 1977 .

[38]  E. Spalding,et al.  Understanding Teacher Education Reform , 2010 .

[39]  Robert S. Siegler,et al.  Piaget on Childhood , 1996 .

[40]  Sharan B. Merriam,et al.  Qualitative research and case study applications in education , 1998 .

[41]  Sjaak Kroon,et al.  Becoming a nation of readers in Timor Leste , 2012 .

[42]  J. Piaget.  The child's construction of reality , 1954 .