A Data-Driven Approach to Kinematic Analysis in Running Using Wearable Technology

Millions of people run. Movement scientists investigate the relationship of running kinematics to fatigue, injury, or running economy mainly using optical motion capture. It was found that running kinematics are highly individual and often cannot be summarized by single variables. We thus present a data-driven analysis of running technique using wearable technology, combining statistical features and machine learning techniques, which allows to identify non-linear, complex relationships. Wearable technology enables running kinematic analysis to a broad mass in unconstrained environments. 20 runners wore 12 sensor units during two experiments: an all out test and a fatiguing run. We used a Support Vector Machine (SVM) to distinguish skill level groups and achieved an accuracy of 76.92% with an acceleration sensor on the upper body. Sensor positions were ranked according to the movement change with fatigue using a feature selection. This ranking was consistent with visual annotations of a movement scientist. We propose a quantitative measure of movement change using a principal component analysis (PCA) and found an average correlation of 0.8369 for all runners with their perceived rating of fatigue.

[1]  Novacheck,et al.  The biomechanics of running. , 1998, Gait & posture.

[2]  T. Derrick,et al.  Impacts and kinematic adjustments during an exhaustive run. , 2002, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[3]  E. Heath Borg's Perceived Exertion and Pain Scales , 1998 .

[4]  Gerhard Tröster,et al.  What Do Sensors Know about Your Running Performance? , 2011, 2011 15th Annual International Symposium on Wearable Computers.

[5]  K. R. Williams,et al.  Relationship between distance running mechanics, running economy, and performance. , 1987, Journal of applied physiology.

[6]  Eli Isakov,et al.  Effect of fatigue on leg kinematics and impact acceleration in long distance running , 2000 .

[7]  G Németh,et al.  Correlation between electromyographic spectral changes and subjective assessment of lumbar muscle fatigue in subjects without pain from the lower back. , 1999, Clinical biomechanics.

[8]  Paavo V. Komi,et al.  Effects of marathon fatigue on running kinematics and economy , 1991 .

[9]  Pui W Kong,et al.  Anthropometric, gait and strength characteristics of kenyan distance runners. , 2008, Journal of sports science & medicine.

[10]  I. Hunter,et al.  Preferred and optimal stride frequency, stiffness and economy: changes with fatigue during a 1-h high-intensity run , 2007, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[11]  D. Kerrigan,et al.  A kinematics and kinetic comparison of overground and treadmill running. , 2008, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[12]  Timothy C Sell,et al.  Running Kinematics and Shock Absorption Do Not Change After Brief Exhaustive Running , 2011, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[13]  T D Noakes,et al.  Peak treadmill running velocity during the VO2 max test predicts running performance. , 1990, Journal of sports sciences.

[14]  Om Azeez,et al.  A Kinematic Comparison of Overground and Treadmill Running , 2010 .

[15]  Oliver Amft,et al.  ETHOS: Miniature orientation sensor for wearable human motion analysis , 2010, 2010 IEEE Sensors.

[16]  P. V. Komi,et al.  Effects of marathon running on running economy and kinematics , 2000, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[17]  Martin Kraus,et al.  Pattern classification of kinematic and kinetic running data to distinguish gender, shod/barefoot and injury groups with feature ranking , 2012, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[18]  D. Pyne,et al.  Factors Affecting Running Economy in Trained Distance Runners , 2004, Sports medicine.

[19]  Gerhard Tröster,et al.  Out of the lab and into the woods: kinematic analysis in running using wearable sensors , 2011, UbiComp '11.

[20]  Marcos Duarte,et al.  Support vector machines for detecting age-related changes in running kinematics. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  Fuhui Long,et al.  Feature selection based on mutual information criteria of max-dependency, max-relevance, and min-redundancy , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[22]  G. Borg Borg's Perceived Exertion and Pain Scales , 1998 .

[23]  Mike Lambert,et al.  The effects of training, muscle damage and fatigue on running economy : review article , 2010 .

[24]  Merijn Wijnen,et al.  Runalyser: Real Time Analysis of Running Technique in Practice (P196) , 2009 .

[25]  Björn Eskofier,et al.  Embedded surface classification in digital sports , 2009, Pattern Recognit. Lett..