ICTs, social thinking and subjective well-being - The internet and its representations in everyday life

Abstract The spread of ICTs constitutes an intriguing phenomenon for studying the interweaving between ways of knowing, thinking and experiencing new ‘realities’. A suitable framework for investigating this topic is the social representations one, which addresses socially shared structures of knowledge, loaded with emotional features and symbolic values. In the present study, we explore how the internet is represented and how it is related to social well-being. The number of participants was 101. The components of the representation – information, attitude, representational field – were investigated using a qualitative–quantitative methodology; social well-being (in general, and after the internet entered one’s own life) was measured through Keyes’ scale [Social Well-Being. Social Psychology Quarterly , 61 ( 2 ), 121–140]; levels of practice were also taken into account. Participants show a medium–high level of social well-being in its various components (integration, acceptance, contribution, actualisation and coherence). A more complex picture appears ‘after internet’, with gains in terms of closeness, contribution, actualisation of society, counterbalanced by diminished trust in people and resort to one’s own group for security and comfort. The representational field opposes an intimate picture to a wider perspective; space to time; functional to experiential features of the internet. Participants take different positions on these dimensions, providing foreseen and unexpected patterns of images and meanings.

[1]  N. Luhmann Vertrauen : ein Mechanismus der Reduktion sozialer Komplexität , 1973 .

[2]  Frank Parry,et al.  Social Consequences of Internet Use: Access, Involvement, and Interaction , 2003 .

[3]  M. Greenacre,et al.  Correspondence Analysis in the Social Sciences. , 1995 .

[4]  S. Shapin Laboratory life. The social construction of scientific facts , 1981, Medical History.

[5]  Y. Amichai-Hamburger,et al.  Loneliness and Internet use , 2003, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[6]  Leopoldina Fortunati,et al.  Mediating the Human Body: Technology, Communication, and Fashion , 2003 .

[7]  Alain Clémence,et al.  The Quantitative Analysis Of Social Representations , 1993 .

[8]  G. Mantovani Internet Haze: Why New Artifacts Can Enhance Situation Ambiguity , 2002 .

[9]  M. Law,et al.  CAUGHT IN THE WEB , 2002, Physical & occupational therapy in pediatrics.

[10]  J. Bryant,et al.  Media effects : advances in theory and research , 2002 .

[11]  Claudia Keser,et al.  Trust and Reputation Building in E-Commerce , 2002 .

[12]  Florin Botosineanu,et al.  Jean-Claude Abric (coord.), Méthodes d'étude des représentations sociales, Éditions Éres, Ramonville Saint-Agne, 2003 , 2004 .

[13]  S. Clausen,et al.  Applied correspondence analysis , 1998 .

[14]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  Internet Paradox Revisited , 2002 .

[15]  J. Musch Sozialpsychologie des Internet , 2001 .

[16]  M. Ibañez RESEÑA de : Joinson, Adam N. Understanding the psychology of internet behaviour virtual worlds, real lives. Gales : Palgrave MacMillan, 2003 , 2003 .

[17]  G. Le Bouedec,et al.  Contribution à la méthodologie d'étude des représentations sociales , 1984 .

[18]  Norbert Mundorf,et al.  Social and psychological effects of information technologies and other interactive media , 2002 .

[19]  Katelyn Y. A. McKenna,et al.  Can you see the real me? Activation and expression of the "true self" on the Internet. , 2002 .

[20]  J. M. Kittross The measurement of meaning , 1959 .

[21]  K. Wright Computer-Mediated Social Support, Older Adults, and Coping. , 2000 .

[22]  Ludovic Lebart,et al.  Analyse statistique des donnees textuelles : questions ouvertes et lexicométrie , 1988 .

[23]  R. Clarke,et al.  Theory and Applications of Correspondence Analysis , 1985 .

[24]  W. Wagner,et al.  Collective symbolic coping with new technology: Knowledge, images and public discourse. , 2002, The British journal of social psychology.

[25]  Giuseppe Mantovani,et al.  The Psychological Construction of the Internet: From Information Foraging to Social Gathering to Cultural Mediation , 2001, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[26]  Claudia Keser,et al.  Trust, the Internet, and the digital divide , 2003, IBM Syst. J..

[27]  Corey L. M. Keyes,et al.  Social well-being. , 1998 .

[28]  Peter Hills,et al.  Uses of the Internet and their relationships with individual differences in personality , 2003, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[29]  P. Mannoni Les représentations sociales , 2003 .

[30]  Patricia Wallace The Psychology of the Internet , 1999 .

[31]  C. Fischer,et al.  America Calling: A Social History of the Telephone to 1940 , 1993 .

[32]  Jp. Digiacomo,et al.  Inter-group Alliances and Rejections Within a Protest Movement - Analysis of the Social Representations , 1980 .

[33]  Pramod K. Nayar,et al.  The Internet in everyday life , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[34]  Yair Amichai-Hamburger,et al.  Internet and personality , 2002, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[35]  J. Bryant,et al.  Media effects: Advances in theory and research, 2nd ed. , 2002 .

[36]  Rossella Falvo,et al.  Beliefs about Internet: Methods of Elicitation and Measurement , 2003 .

[37]  A. Joinson Understanding the Psychology of Internet Behaviour: Virtual Worlds, Real Lives , 2002 .

[38]  C. Rusbult,et al.  Commitment, pro-relationship behavior, and trust in close relationships. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[39]  Rudi Volti,et al.  America Calling: A Social History of the Telephone to 1940 , 1992 .

[40]  Jean-Claude Abric,et al.  Méthodes d'étude des représentations sociales , 2005 .