Quantitative model of transport-aperture coordination during reach-to-grasp movements

It has been found in our previous studies that the initiation of aperture closure during reach-to-grasp movements occurs when the hand distance to target crosses a threshold that is a function of peak aperture amplitude, hand velocity, and hand acceleration. Thus, a stable relationship between those four movement parameters is observed at the moment of aperture closure initiation. Based on the concept of optimal control of movements (Naslin 1969) and its application for reach-to-grasp movement regulation (Hoff and Arbib 1993), it was hypothesized that the mathematical equation expressing that relationship can be generalized to describe coordination between hand transport and finger aperture during the entire reach-to-grasp movement by adding aperture velocity and acceleration to the above four movement parameters. The present study examines whether this hypothesis is supported by the data obtained in experiments in which young adults performed reach-to-grasp movements in eight combinations of two reach-amplitude conditions and four movement-speed conditions. It was found that linear approximation of the mathematical model described the relationship among the six movement parameters for the entire aperture-closure phase with very high precision for each condition, thus supporting the hypothesis for that phase. Testing whether one mathematical model could approximate the data across all the experimental conditions revealed that it was possible to achieve the same high level of data-fitting precision only by including in the model two additional, condition-encoding parameters and using a nonlinear, artificial neural network-based approximator with two hidden layers comprising three and two neurons, respectively. This result indicates that transport-aperture coordination, as a specific relationship between the parameters of hand transport and finger aperture, significantly depends on the condition-encoding variables. The data from the aperture-opening phase also fit a linear model, whose coefficients were substantially different from those identified for the aperture-closure phase. This result supports the above hypothesis for the aperture-opening phase, and consequently, for the entire reach-to-grasp movement. However, the fitting precision was considerably lower than that for the aperture-closure phase, indicating significant trial-to-trial variability of transport-aperture coordination during the aperture-opening phase. Implications for understanding the neural mechanisms employed by the CNS for controlling reach-to-grasp movements and utilization of the mathematical model of transport-aperture coordination for data analysis are discussed.

[1]  T. Ebner,et al.  Finger movements during reach-to-grasp in the monkey: amplitude scaling of a temporal synergy , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  Jinsung Wang,et al.  Coordination among the body segments during reach-to-grasp action involving the trunk , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[3]  Yury P. Shimansky,et al.  Role of vision in aperture closure control during reach-to-grasp movements , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[4]  B. Bergum,et al.  Attention and performance IX , 1982 .

[5]  L. S. Jakobson,et al.  Time to contact and the control of manual prehension , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[6]  J. A. Scott Kelso,et al.  Temporal constraints in reaching and grasping behavior , 1990 .

[7]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Selective perturbation of visual input during prehension movements , 1991, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  H. Zelaznik,et al.  Motor-output variability: a theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts. , 1979, Psychological review.

[9]  M. Santello,et al.  The role of vision on hand preshaping during reach to grasp , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  M. A. Arbib,et al.  Models of Trajectory Formation and Temporal Interaction of Reach and Grasp. , 1993, Journal of motor behavior.

[11]  Carolyn R. Mason,et al.  Monkey hand postural synergies during reach-to-grasp in the absence of vision of the hand and object. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  Reinoud J. Bootsma,et al.  Spatio-temporal organisation of natural prehension , 1992 .

[13]  Robert Sessions Woodworth,et al.  THE ACCURACY OF VOLUNTARY MOVEMENT , 1899 .

[14]  P Haggard,et al.  On the hand transport component of prehensile movements. , 1997, Journal of motor behavior.

[15]  G. Stelmach,et al.  Grip reorganization during wrist transport: the influence of an Altered aperture , 1996, Experimental Brain Research.

[16]  G. Stelmach,et al.  Alterations in transport path differentially affect temporal and spatial movement parameters , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Gradual molding of the hand to object contours. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  Patrick Haggard,et al.  Coordinated responses following mechanical perturbation of the arm during prehension , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  M. Jeannerod Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural visual objects , 1981 .

[20]  P. Fitts The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[21]  George E Stelmach,et al.  Effect of Orienting the Finger Opposition Space in the Control of Reach-to-Grasp Movements , 2005, Journal of motor behavior.

[22]  M. Santello,et al.  Control of hand shaping in response to object shape perturbation , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[23]  E. Brenner,et al.  A new view on grasping. , 1999, Motor control.

[24]  M. Jeannerod The timing of natural prehension movements. , 1984, Journal of motor behavior.

[25]  M. Jeannerod The formation of finger grip during prehension. A cortically mediated visuomotor pattern , 1986, Behavioural Brain Research.

[26]  J. R. Bloedel,et al.  Effects of accuracy constraints on reach-to-grasp movements in cerebellar patients , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[27]  U. Castiello,et al.  Reach to grasp: the response to a simultaneous perturbation of object position and size , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[28]  B Hopkins,et al.  The coordination of two-effector actions: spoon-feeding and intermanual prehension. , 1999, British journal of psychology.

[29]  Miya K. Rand,et al.  Effect of speed manipulation on the control of aperture closure during reach-to-grasp movements , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[30]  Alan M. Wing,et al.  Remote responses to perturbation in human prehension , 1991, Neuroscience Letters.

[31]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Influence of different types of grasping on the transport component of prehension movements , 1991, Neuropsychologia.

[32]  Christine L. MacKenzie,et al.  Functional relationships between grasp and transport components in a prehension task , 1990 .

[33]  S. A. Wallace,et al.  Temporal constraints in the control of prehensile movement. , 1988, Journal of motor behavior.

[34]  George E. Stelmach,et al.  Spatial and temporal control of trunk-assisted prehensile actions , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[35]  R. J. Bootsma,et al.  Coordination in prehension Information-based coupling of reaching and grasping , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[36]  J. R. Bloedel,et al.  Control of aperture closure during reach-to-grasp movements in parkinson’s disease , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[37]  M. Arbib,et al.  Grasping objects: the cortical mechanisms of visuomotor transformation , 1995, Trends in Neurosciences.

[38]  James R. Bloedel,et al.  Temporal control of the reach and grip components during a prehension task in humans , 1996, Neuroscience Letters.

[39]  S. Vogt,et al.  Vision of the hand and environmental context in human prehension , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[40]  Pierre Naslin Essentials of optimal control , 1968 .

[41]  U. Castiello,et al.  The reach-to-grasp movement in Parkinson’s disease: response to a simultaneous perturbation of object position and object size , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[42]  G. Fullerton Psychology and physiology. , 1896 .

[43]  Luis F. Schettino,et al.  Effects of object shape and visual feedback on hand configuration during grasping , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[44]  M. Gentilucci,et al.  Temporal coupling between transport and grasp components during prehension movements: effects of visual perturbation , 1992, Behavioural Brain Research.

[45]  J. R. Bloedel,et al.  Adaptation of reach-to-grasp movement in response to force perturbations , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.