Toward ranking interventions for Technological Innovation Systems via the concept of Leverage Points

The Technological Innovation Systems (TIS) approach provides a conceptual framework to find ways to stimulate technological innovation. It prescribes that interventions should be focused on alleviating systemic problems that cause unsatisfactory system performance. Although literature provides guidelines to identify systemic problems and formulate options for intervention, the framework is less developed in relation to choosing between these intervention options and deciding on how to combine them into a coherent set. Inspiration is found from a ranking that relates to the concept of leverage points from System Dynamics. After an exploration of conceptual links between the TIS and System Dynamics frameworks, a modified ranking for the TIS-framework is proposed. The proposed ranking may inform the choice between different types of intervention options for a TIS and for creating coherent intervention sets. This is illustrated by discussing two intervention sets aimed to improve the energy-efficiency of existing houses in the Netherlands.

[1]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  Innovation system analyses and sustainability transitions: Contributions and suggestions for research , 2011 .

[2]  Marko P. Hekkert,et al.  Innovation Studies Utrecht ( ISU ) Working Paper Series Why does Renewable Energy diffuse so slowly ? A review of innovation system problems , 2011 .

[3]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  Conceptual confusion – an analysis of the meaning of concepts in technological innovation systems and sociological functionalism , 2014, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[4]  P. Senge.  The fifth discipline : the art and practice of the learning organization/ Peter M. Senge , 1991 .

[5]  H. Rohracher,et al.  Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change , 2012 .

[6]  Arie Rip,et al.  Expectations in Technological Developments: an Example of Prospective Structures to be Filled in by Agency , 1998 .

[7]  Lars Coenen,et al.  Sustainability transitions in the making: A closer look at actors, strategies and resources , 2012 .

[8]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis , 2008 .

[9]  Jacco Farla,et al.  Towards an integrated framework for analysing sustainable innovation policy , 2013, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[10]  M. Hekkert,et al.  Cumulative causation in the formation of a technological innovation system: The case of biofuels in the Netherlands , 2009 .

[11]  B. Truffer,et al.  Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects , 2012 .

[12]  P. Cooke,et al.  Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions , 1997 .

[13]  B. Carlsson,et al.  On the nature, function and composition of technological systems , 1991 .

[14]  F. Malerba.  Sectoral systems of innovation and production , 2002 .

[15]  D. Lang,et al.  Leverage points for sustainability transformation , 2017, Ambio.

[16]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  Innovation systems: analytical and methodological issues , 2002 .

[17]  M. Hekkert,et al.  Innovation Studies Utrecht ( ISU ) Working Paper Series Systemic instruments for systemic innovation problems : a framework for policy makers and innovation scholars , 2011 .

[18]  Daniel J. Lang,et al.  Many pathways toward sustainability: not conflict but co-learning between transition narratives , 2017, Sustainability Science.

[19]  Stefan Kuhlmann,et al.  Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change , 2007 .

[20]  Marko P. Hekkert,et al.  Technological innovation systems in contexts: conceptualizing contextual structures and interaction dynamics , 2015 .

[21]  E. Rouwette,et al.  Sustainability transition dynamics: Towards overcoming policy resistance , 2016 .

[22]  Jochen Markard,et al.  Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: Towards an integrated framework , 2008 .

[23]  Cristina Chaminade,et al.  Rationales for Public Policy Intervention in the Innovation Process: Systems of Innovation Approach , 2010 .

[24]  Rpjm Rob Raven,et al.  Modelling the dynamics of technological innovation systems , 2016 .

[25]  C. Edquist,et al.  Institutions and Organizations in Systems of Innovation , 2013 .

[26]  Mads Borup,et al.  The sociology of expectations in science and technology , 2006, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[27]  Marko P. Hekkert,et al.  The bumpy road of biomass gasification in the Netherlands: Explaining the rise and fall of an emerging innovation system , 2008 .

[28]  Floortje Alkemade,et al.  Expectations as a key to understanding actor strategies in the field of fuel cell and hydrogen vehicles , 2012, Technological forecasting and social change.

[29]  Marko P. Hekkert,et al.  Interactions between systemic problems in innovation systems: The case of energy-efficient houses in the Netherlands , 2017 .

[30]  V. Gilsing,et al.  A system failure framework for innovation policy design , 2005 .

[31]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  The diffusion of renewable energy technology: an analytical framework and key issues for research , 2000 .

[32]  Mark Cantley.  Collected Papers of Jay W. Forrester , 1975 .

[33]  Simon Peck,et al.  Group Model Building: Facilitating Team Learning Using System Dynamics , 1996, J. Oper. Res. Soc..