Experimental support for a resource-based mechanistic model of invasibility

Recent theory has suggested a mechanistic relationship between resource availability, competition and invasibility. In a field experiment, in which we manipulated resources and competition, we confirmed that changes in resource availability affected competition intensity, which in turn affected invasibility. We found that fluctuations in resource availability of as short as a few weeks had a large impact on plant invasion success (survival and percentage cover), including up to 1 year following the fluctuations. If resource availability is a primary mechanism controlling invasibility, it may serve as a unifying concept that can integrate earlier ideas regarding invasibility. The results emphasize the important role of history in the invasion process, particularly the occurrence of stochastic, short-lived events that temporarily reduce or suspend competition and increase invasibility. Therefore, it may be very difficult, or even impossible, to reconstruct the ecology of particular invasions after the fact.

[1]  C. E. SHANNON,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[2]  David Tilman,et al.  Plant diversity increases resistance to invasion in the absence of covarying extrinsic factors , 2000 .

[3]  Mark A. Davis,et al.  Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibility , 2000 .

[4]  M. Ritchie.  NITROGEN LIMITATION AND TROPHIC VS. ABIOTIC INFLUENCES ON INSECT HERBIVORES IN A TEMPERATE GRASSLAND , 2000 .

[5]  J. Levine.  Species diversity and biological invasions: relating local process to community pattern. , 2000, Science.

[6]  Mark A. Davis,et al.  Eight Ways to be a Colonizer; Two Ways to be an Invader. , 2000 .

[7]  W. M. Lonsdale,et al.  GLOBAL PATTERNS OF PLANT INVASIONS AND THE CONCEPT OF INVASIBILITY , 1999 .

[8]  Thomas J. Stohlgren,et al.  EXOTIC PLANT SPECIES INVADE HOT SPOTS OF NATIVE PLANT DIVERSITY , 1999 .

[9]  Mark A. Davis,et al.  Competition between tree seedlings and herbaceous vegetation: support for a theory of resource supply and demand , 1998 .

[10]  David Tilman,et al.  COMMUNITY INVASIBILITY, RECRUITMENT LIMITATION, AND GRASSLAND BIODIVERSITY , 1997 .

[11]  D. Tilman.  Species Richness of Experimental Productivity Gradients: How Important is Colonization Limitation? , 1993 .

[12]  Paul A. Keddy,et al.  FERTILITY AND DISTURBANCE GRADIENTS: A SUMMARY MODEL FOR RIVERINE MARSH VEGETATION' , 1988 .

[13]  R. Hobbs,et al.  Effect of disturbance and nutrient addition on native and introduced annuals in plant communities in the Western Australian wheatbelt , 1988 .

[14]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Evidence for the Existence of Three Primary Strategies in Plants and Its Relevance to Ecological and Evolutionary Theory , 1977, The American Naturalist.

[15]  D. Grigal,et al.  The soils of Cedar Creek Natural History Area , 1974 .

[16]  C. Elton.  The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants , 1960, Springer US.

[17]  Claude E. Shannon,et al.  The mathematical theory of communication , 1950 .