Single-expose patterning development for EUV lithography

Initial readiness of EUV (extreme ultraviolet) patterning was demonstrated in 2016 with IBM Alliance's 7nm device technology. The focus has now shifted to driving the 'effective' k1 factor and enabling the second generation of EUV patterning. With the substantial cost of EUV exposure there is significant interest in extending the capability to do single exposure patterning with EUV. To enable this, emphasis must be placed on the aspect ratios, adhesion, defectivity reduction, etch selectivity, and imaging control of the whole patterning process. Innovations in resist materials and processes must be included to realize the full entitlement of EUV lithography at 0.33NA. In addition, enhancements in the patterning process to enable good defectivity, lithographic process window, and post etch pattern fidelity are also required. Through this work, the fundamental material challenges in driving down the effective k1 factor will be highlighted.

[1]  Nelson Felix,et al.  Ultrathin EUV patterning stack using polymer brush as an adhesion promotion layer , 2017, Advanced Lithography.

[2]  Dario L. Goldfarb,et al.  Trilayer Development for 193 nm Immersion Lithography , 2007 .

[3]  Yayi Wei,et al.  Performance of tri-layer process required for 22 nm and beyond , 2011, Advanced Lithography.

[4]  Patrick P. Naulleau,et al.  Resolution, LER, and sensitivity limitations of photoresists , 2008, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[5]  Nelson Felix,et al.  Study of alternate hardmasks for extreme ultraviolet patterning , 2016 .

[6]  Ramakrishnan Ayothi,et al.  Novel EUV resist development for sub-14nm half pitch , 2015, Advanced Lithography.

[7]  Anuja De Silva,et al.  Fundamentals of EUV resist-inorganic hardmask interactions , 2017, Advanced Lithography.

[8]  Noriaki Fujitani,et al.  The novel spin-on hard mask and ultrathin UL material for EUVL , 2012, Other Conferences.

[9]  Seth Kruger,et al.  RLS tradeoff vs. quantum yield of high PAG EUV resists , 2009, Advanced Lithography.

[10]  Patrick P. Naulleau,et al.  Fundamental limits to EUV photoresist , 2007, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[11]  John Arnold,et al.  Driving down defect density in composite EUV patterning film stacks , 2017, Advanced Lithography.

[12]  Nelson Felix,et al.  EUV processing and characterization for BEOL , 2015, Advanced Lithography.

[13]  S. Tagawa,et al.  Radiation Chemistry in Chemically Amplified Resists , 2010 .

[14]  Kentaro Goto,et al.  Ultra-thin-film EUV resists beyond 20nm lithography , 2011, Advanced Lithography.

[15]  Carlos Fonseca,et al.  EUV resist requirements: absorbance and acid yield , 2009, Advanced Lithography.

[16]  Hans Meiling,et al.  Performance optimization of MOPA pre-pulse LPP light source , 2015, Advanced Lithography.

[17]  Yongan Xu,et al.  EUV patterning successes and frontiers , 2016, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[18]  Peter Trefonas,et al.  Shot noise, LER, and quantum efficiency of EUV photoresists , 2004, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[19]  Gijsbert Rispens,et al.  Sensitivity enhancement of chemically amplified resists and performance study using EUV interference lithography , 2016, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[20]  Robert L. Bruce,et al.  Pattern collapse mitigation strategies for EUV lithography , 2012, Advanced Lithography.

[21]  Ryan Del Re,et al.  Secondary Electrons in EUV Lithography , 2013 .

[22]  Wataru Shibayama,et al.  EUV lithography and etching performance enhancement by EUV sensitive Si hard mask (EUV Si-HM) for 1Xnm hp generation , 2014, Advanced Lithography.

[23]  Dario L. Goldfarb,et al.  Acid generation efficiency: EUV photons versus photoelectrons , 2016, SPIE Advanced Lithography.