Using Discourse Analysis and Automatic Text Generation to Study Discourse Cue Usage

Our two stage methodology for the study of cue usage coordinates an exhaustive corpus analysis with a system for text generation. Coding of the corpus uses Relational Discourse Analysis, a synthesis of two previous accounts of discourse structure. In the first stage of our study, hypotheses about cue usage are evaluated and refined using the corpus analysis. Several initial results conccrning how cues mark segment structure are presented here. In the second stage of our study, the results of the corpus analysis are used to determine a set of heuristics to be implemented in a system for text generation. The automatic generation of texts is then used to exercise and further evaluate the heuristics for cue placement.

[1]  Johanna D. Moore,et al.  Investigating Discourse Relations , 1993, Workshop On Intentionality And Structure In Discource Relations.

[2]  R. J. Lickley,et al.  Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing. , 1992 .

[3]  H. Mack Coherence And Structure , 1974 .

[4]  Clarisse Sieckenius de Souza,et al.  Getting the message across in RST-based text generation , 1990 .

[5]  Marti A. Hearst TextTiling: A Quantitative Approach to Discourse , 1993 .

[6]  INGRID ZUKERMAN,et al.  A predictive approach for the generation of rhetorical devices , 1990, Comput. Intell..

[7]  Chris Mellish,et al.  Current research in natural language generation , 1990 .

[8]  Johanna D. Moore,et al.  A Problem for RST: The Need for Multi-Level Discourse Analysis , 1992, CL.

[9]  A. Knott,et al.  Using Linguistic Phenomena to Motivate a Set of Coherence Relations. , 1994 .

[10]  R. F. Lorch,et al.  Text-signaling devices and their effects on reading and memory processes , 1989 .

[11]  Manfred Stede,et al.  Customizing RST for the Automatic Production of Technical Manuals , 1992, NLG.

[12]  Michael Elhadad,et al.  Generating Connectives , 1990, COLING.

[13]  A. Graesser,et al.  The impact of connectives on the memory for expository texts , 1993 .

[14]  Julia Hirschberg,et al.  Some intonational characteristics of discourse structure , 1992, ICSLP.

[15]  Rebecca J. Passonneau,et al.  Intention-Based Segmentation: Human Reliability and Correlation with Linguistic Cues , 1993, ACL.

[16]  J. Hobbs On the coherence and structure of discourse , 1985 .

[17]  James F. Allen,et al.  A Plan Recognition Model for Subdialogues in Conversations , 1987, Cogn. Sci..

[18]  William C. Mann,et al.  Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization , 1988 .

[19]  D MooreJohanna,et al.  A problem for RST , 1992 .

[20]  Candace L. Sidner,et al.  Attention, Intentions, and the Structure of Discourse , 1986, CL.