Level-of-processing effects in conceptually driven implicit tasks

Level of processing (LOP) has often been shown to affect performance on explicit memory tasks, but not on implicit memory tasks. However, the framework of Roediger, weldon, and Challis (1989) predicts that conceptually driven implicit (CDI) memory teasks should be affected by a LOP manipulation, because study and test tasks share common conceptual processes. This prediction was investigated with 2 CDI tasks: general knowledge retrieval and category exemplar generation.

[1]  J. Stroop.  Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. , 1992 .

[2]  E Tulving,et al.  Priming and human memory systems. , 1990, Science.

[3]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  Implicit memory: effects of elaboration depend on unitization , 1989 .

[4]  H. Roediger,et al.  Explaining dissociations between implicit and explicit measures of retention: A processing account , 1989 .

[5]  Steven A. Sloman,et al.  Forgetting in primed fragment completion. , 1988 .

[6]  Robert A. Bjork,et al.  Measures of Memory , 1988 .

[7]  Arthur P. Shimamura,et al.  Strength and duration of priming effects in normal subjects and amnesic patients , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[8]  I. Begg,et al.  The generation effect: Evidence for generalized inhibition. , 1987 .

[9]  Henry L. Roediger,et al.  Retrieval modes produce dissociations in memory for surface information. , 1987 .

[10]  D. Schacter,et al.  Effects of elaborative processing on implicit and explicit memory for new associations. , 1986 .

[11]  T. Blaxton.  Investigating dissociations among memory measures: Support for a transfer-appropriate processing framework. , 1989 .

[12]  B. Byrne,et al.  Autobiographical memory and perceptual learning: A developmental study using picture recognition, naming latency, and perceptual identification , 1985, Memory & cognition.

[13]  A P Shimamura,et al.  Priming across modalities and priming across category levels: extending the domain of preserved function in amnesia. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[14]  J. S. Nairne,et al.  Representation in the mental lexicon: Implications for theories of the generation effect , 1985, Memory & cognition.

[15]  L R Squire,et al.  Paired-associate learning and priming effects in amnesia: a neuropsychological study. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[16]  G. Mandler,et al.  Activation makes words more accessible, but not necessarily more retrievable. , 1984 .

[17]  P. A. Kolers,et al.  Procedures of mind. , 1984 .

[18]  Nobuo Ohta,et al.  Priming effects in word-fragment completion for short- and long-term retention intervals , 1984 .

[19]  D Milech,et al.  Common and modality-specific processes in the mental lexicon , 1983, Memory & cognition.

[20]  E. Tulving.  Elements of episodic memory , 1983 .

[21]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  Priming effects in word-fragment completion are independent of recognition memory. , 1982 .

[22]  L. Jacoby,et al.  Remembering without awareness , 1982 .

[23]  L. Jacoby,et al.  On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[24]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory , 1980 .

[25]  N. J. Slamecka,et al.  The Generation Effect: Delineation of a Phenomenon , 1978 .

[26]  John D. Bransford,et al.  Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing , 1977 .

[27]  Don L. Scarborough,et al.  Frequency and Repetition Effects in Lexical Memory. , 1977 .

[28]  E. Tulving,et al.  Organization of memory. , 1973 .

[29]  E. Warrington,et al.  Amnesic Syndrome: Consolidation or Retrieval? , 1970, Nature.

[30]  W. Montague,et al.  Category norms of verbal items in 56 categories A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms , 1969 .

[31]  E. Tulving,et al.  Availability versus accessibility of information in memory for words , 1966 .