Disruptive effects of disconfirmed expectancies about crowding.

The experiment utilized a 2 (high vs. low room density) X 2 (forewarning of a crowded room vs. no forewarning) X 2 (simple vs. complex task) design to examine the effects of anticipation of crowding on task performance. More tasks were attempted and efficiency was higher when expectancies about the crowd were confirmed. Subjects not told to anticipate a crowd who actually worked under high density and subjects warned about a crowd that did not materialize performed most poorly. These differences were largest for the complex task. Baum and Greenberg's results were replicated with the performance data. Perceptions of the experimental room also differed as a function of anticipation, but failure to obtain a Crowding X Anticipation interaction did not support their hypothesis that anticipating a crowd induces identical perceptions to those obtained under actual crowding. The results are discussed in terms of disconfirmed expectancies being disruptive of performance, particularly complex task performance.

[1]  P. Paulus,et al.  Enhancement and Reduction of Task Performance by Psychological Modeling , 1978 .

[2]  Clarence Raymond Wylie 101 puzzles in thought and logic , 1957 .

[3]  D. Sherrod,et al.  Crowding, Perceived Control, and Behavioral Aftereffects1 , 1974 .

[4]  N. B. Cottrell,et al.  Social facilitation of dominant responses by the presence of an audicence and the mere presence of others. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  A. Baum,et al.  Differential response to anticipated crowding: Psychological effects of social and spatial density. , 1976 .

[6]  J. Averill Personal control over aversive stimuli and its relationship to stress. , 1973 .

[7]  S. Solomon,et al.  Toward an understanding of crowding: The role of physical interaction. , 1977 .

[8]  A. Baum,et al.  Waiting for a crowd: the behavioral and perceptual effects of anticipated crowding. , 1975, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[9]  Robert A. Karlin,et al.  Crowding and the Role of Interpersonal Distance Preference , 1977 .

[10]  Y. Epstein,et al.  Effects of Acute Experimental Crowding1 , 1975 .

[11]  G. S. Sanders,et al.  Distraction as a Source of Drive in Social Facilitation Research , 1978 .

[12]  Paul R. Ehrlich,et al.  The Effect of Crowding on Human Task Performance1 , 1971 .

[13]  Paul B. Paulus,et al.  Density does affect task performance. , 1976 .

[14]  E. Langer,et al.  Crowding and cognitive control. , 1977 .

[15]  E. Sundstrom An experimental study of crowding: effects of room size, intrusion, and goal blocking on nonverbal behavior, self-disclosure, and self-reported stress. , 1975, Journal of personality and social psychology.