User advocacy and information system project performance

Abstract User participation in information system projects is an established practice well backed by research. However, participation is usually considered limited to helping shape the requirements of the system being developed in order to be certain that a functional system is developed. This narrow perspective overlooks the potential of having the user be an advocate for the system to grow support among all stakeholders of the project. We build and empirically test a model that links user advocacy to project performance. The model also establishes links between two potential antecedents of user advocacy, socialization that includes training and relationship development, and extrinsic motivation. All links are positively supported by data collected from 128 matched-pairs of information system users and developers. Information system project managers are encouraged to establish reward structures and training to promote a role of advocacy for the users represented in the project team.

[1]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[2]  J. Dawes Do Data Characteristics Change According to the Number of Scale Points Used? An Experiment Using 5-Point, 7-Point and 10-Point Scales , 2008 .

[3]  Gary Klein,et al.  Lack of Skill Risks to Organizational Technology Learning and Software Project Performance , 2007, Inf. Resour. Manag. J..

[4]  Jack Shih-Chieh Hsu,et al.  The impacts of user review on software responsiveness: Moderating requirements uncertainty , 2008, Inf. Manag..

[5]  Gary Klein,et al.  The Effects of User Partnering and User Non-Support on Project Performance , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[6]  Gary Klein,et al.  Reducing user-related risks during and prior to system development , 2002 .

[7]  E. B. Swanson,et al.  Management Information Systems: Appreciation and Involvement , 1974 .

[8]  Charles B. Handy Understanding organizations : Charles B. Handy , 1986 .

[9]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and an Electronic - Mail Emotion/Adoption Study , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[10]  S. Messick Test validity and the ethics of assessment. , 1980 .

[11]  Howard B. Lee,et al.  Foundations of Behavioral Research , 1973 .

[12]  Jane Galloway Seiling,et al.  The role of the customer advocate: Contextual and task performance as advocacy participation , 2008 .

[13]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior , 1975, Perspectives in Social Psychology.

[14]  Craig S. Galbraith Strategies and organizations in transition , 2002 .

[15]  R. Korte,et al.  How newcomers learn the social norms of an organization: A case study of the socialization of newly hired engineers , 2009 .

[16]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  Transferring, Translating, and Transforming: An Integrative Framework for Managing Knowledge Across Boundaries , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[17]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Identifying Software Project Risks: An International Delphi Study , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[18]  Kathy Schwalbe,et al.  Information Technology Project Management , 1999 .

[19]  Neil E. Fassina,et al.  Socialization tactics and newcomer adjustment: A meta-analytic review and test of a model , 2007 .

[20]  Gary Klein,et al.  User and developer common knowledge: Effect on the success of information system development projects , 2009 .

[21]  Andrew J. Sense The conditioning of project participants’ authority to learn within projects , 2008 .

[22]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[23]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Participation in Development and Implementation - Updating An Old, Tired Concept for Today's IS Contexts , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[24]  Todd Bodner,et al.  Newcomer adjustment during organizational socialization: a meta-analytic review of antecedents, outcomes, and methods. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[25]  Wynne W. Chin The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. , 1998 .

[26]  L. Stern,et al.  Conducting Interorganizational Research Using Key Informants , 1993 .

[27]  John P. Campbell,et al.  Measurement Theory for the Behavioral Sciences. , 1983 .

[28]  George A. Marcoulides,et al.  Modern methods for business research , 1998 .

[29]  Mary C. Jones,et al.  IS project team performance: An empirical assessment , 1996, Inf. Manag..

[30]  Gloria Mark,et al.  User Advocacy in Participatory Design: Designers' Experiences with a New Communication Channel , 2004, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[31]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Attention Shaping and Software Risk - A Categorical Analysis of Four Classical Risk Management Approaches , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[32]  D. Bryde Perceptions of the impact of project sponsorship practices on project success , 2008 .

[33]  B. Avolio,et al.  Impact of Transformational Leadership on Follower Development and Performance: A Field Experiment , 2002 .

[34]  James J. Jiang,et al.  Task completion competency and project management performance: The influence of control and user contribution , 2010 .

[35]  Wynne W. Chin Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling by , 2009 .

[36]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Motivational synergy: Toward new conceptualizations of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in the workplace , 1993 .

[37]  James J. Jiang,et al.  Consonance in information systems , 2001 .

[38]  Ernest Jordan,et al.  Top management support: mantra or necessity? , 2008 .

[39]  Richard M. Steers,et al.  Motivation and Work Behaviour , 1978 .

[40]  角山 剛 Motivation and Work Behavior (Fifth edition),Richard M.Steers& Lyman W.Porter,1991,McGraw-Hill , 1993 .

[41]  Richard P. Bagozzi,et al.  Assessing Construct Validity in Organizational Research , 1991 .

[42]  A. Colman,et al.  Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences. , 2000, Acta psychologica.

[43]  William Lewis,et al.  PLS, Small Sample Size, and Statistical Power in MIS Research , 2006, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06).

[44]  Violina Ratcheva,et al.  Integrating diverse knowledge through boundary spanning processes – The case of multidisciplinary project teams , 2009 .

[45]  William R. King,et al.  The Role of User Participation in Information Systems Development: Implications from a Meta-Analysis , 2008, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[46]  Tom Butler,et al.  The Relationship Between User Participation and the Management of Change Surrounding the Development of Information Systems: A European Perspective , 2001, J. Organ. End User Comput..

[47]  Gary Klein,et al.  User commitment and collaboration: Motivational antecedents and project performance , 2010, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[48]  Suzanne Rivard,et al.  An Integrative Contingency Model of Software Project Risk Management , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[49]  A. Colella,et al.  Newcomer and Organizational Socialization Tactics: An Interactionist Perspective , 2000 .

[50]  Gary Dessler,et al.  Essentials of Human Resource Management , 1999 .

[51]  Henri Barki,et al.  Measuring User Participation, User Involvement, and User Attitude , 1994, MIS Q..

[52]  J. Rodney Turner,et al.  The Project Manager's Leadership Style as a Success Factor on Projects: A Literature Review , 2005 .

[53]  Amy L. Ostrom,et al.  Client Co-Production in Knowledge-Intensive Business Services , 2002 .

[54]  John Hulland,et al.  Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies , 1999 .

[55]  Daryl R. Conner,et al.  Managing at the Speed of Change: How Resilient Managers Succeed and Prosper Where Others Fail , 1993 .