Multiscale forward electromagnetic model of uterine contractions during pregnancy

BackgroundAnalyzing and monitoring uterine contractions during pregnancy is relevant to the field of reproductive health assessment. Its clinical importance is grounded in the need to reliably predict the onset of labor at term and pre-term. Preterm births can cause health problems or even be fatal for the fetus. Currently, there are no objective methods for consistently predicting the onset of labor based on sensing of the mechanical or electrophysiological aspects of uterine contractions. Therefore, modeling uterine contractions could help to better interpret such measurements and to develop more accurate methods for predicting labor. In this work, we develop a multiscale forward electromagnetic model of myometrial contractions during pregnancy. In particular, we introduce a model of myometrial current source densities and compute its magnetic field and action potential at the abdominal surface, using Maxwell’s equations and a four-compartment volume conductor geometry. To model the current source density at the myometrium we use a bidomain approach. We consider a modified version of the Fitzhugh-Nagumo (FHN) equation for modeling ionic currents in each myocyte, assuming a plateau-type transmembrane potential, and we incorporate the anisotropic nature of the uterus by designing conductivity-tensor fields.ResultsWe illustrate our modeling approach considering a spherical uterus and one pacemaker located in the fundus. We obtained a travelling transmembrane potential depolarizing from −56 mV to −16 mV and an average potential in the plateau area of −25 mV with a duration, before hyperpolarization, of 35 s, which is a good approximation with respect to the average recorded transmembrane potentials at term reported in the technical literature. Similarly, the percentage of myometrial cells contracting as a function of time had the same symmetric properties and duration as the intrauterine pressure waveforms of a pregnant human myometrium at term.ConclusionsWe introduced a multiscale modeling approach of uterine contractions which allows for incorporating electrophysiological and anatomical knowledge of the myometrium jointly. Our results are in good agreement with the values reported in the experimental technical literature, and these are potentially important as a tool for helping in the characterization of contractions and for predicting labor using magnetomyography (MMG) and electromyography (EMG).

[1]  C. Simon,et al.  Emergent Behaviors in a Deterministic Model of the Human Uterus , 2010, Reproductive Sciences.

[2]  G. Wolfs,et al.  Electromyographic Observations on the Human Uterus during Labour , 1979, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica. Supplement.

[3]  J. R. Price,et al.  Looking to the future , 1976, Nature.

[4]  R. Young,et al.  Three-dimensional structure of the smooth muscle in the term-pregnant human uterus. , 1999, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[5]  D. Geselowitz,et al.  Simulation Studies of the Electrocardiogram: I. The Normal Heart , 1978, Circulation research.

[6]  S. Yoshizawa,et al.  An Active Pulse Transmission Line Simulating Nerve Axon , 1962, Proceedings of the IRE.

[7]  Henggui Zhang,et al.  A Computational Model of the Ionic Currents, Ca2+ Dynamics and Action Potentials Underlying Contraction of Isolated Uterine Smooth Muscle , 2011, PloS one.

[8]  M L Barclay,et al.  A Computer Model of Uterine Contractions Based on Discrete Contractile Elements , 1995, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[9]  A V Holden,et al.  Towards a computational reconstruction of the electrodynamics of premature and full term human labour. , 2011, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[10]  C. Marque,et al.  A two dimension model of the uterine electrical wave propagation , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[11]  S. Tentoni,et al.  Mathematical modeling of the excitation process in myocardial tissue: influence of fiber rotation on wavefront propagation and potential field. , 1990, Mathematical biosciences.

[12]  Anatoly Shmygol,et al.  Control of Uterine Ca2+ by Membrane Voltage , 2007, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[13]  A. Jaffa,et al.  Modeling Myometrial Smooth Muscle Contraction , 2007, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[14]  M. Peters,et al.  Estimation of the electrical conductivity of human tissue , 2001 .

[15]  Hubert Preissl,et al.  First magnetomyographic recordings of uterine activity with spatial-temporal information with a 151-channel sensor array. , 2002, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[16]  Leslie Tung,et al.  A bi-domain model for describing ischemic myocardial d-c potentials , 1978 .

[17]  R. Young,et al.  A Computer Model of Uterine Contractions Based on Action Potential Propagation and Intercellular Calcium Waves , 1997, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[18]  P. Sokolowski,et al.  Human Uterine Wall Tension Trajectories and the Onset of Parturition , 2010, PloS one.

[19]  Jan W. M. Bergmans,et al.  Modeling and Identification of the Electrohysterographic Volume Conductor by High-Density Electrodes , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[20]  M. Wikland,et al.  Relationship between electrical and mechanical activity of the isolated term-pregnant human myometrium. , 1985, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[21]  I Shapiro,et al.  Myometrial thickness in pregnancy: longitudinal sonographic study. , 1998, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[22]  S. Brennecke,et al.  Contractile activity, membrane potential, and cytoplasmic calcium in human uterine smooth muscle in the third trimester of pregnancy and during labor. , 1999, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[23]  D. B. Heppner,et al.  Considerations of quasi-stationarity in electrophysiological systems. , 1967, The Bulletin of mathematical biophysics.

[24]  Catherine Marque,et al.  Mathematical modeling of electrical activity of uterine muscle cells , 2009, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[25]  H. Preissl,et al.  Forward Modeling of Uterine EMG and MMG Contractions , 2009 .

[26]  David Elad,et al.  Mathematical model of excitation-contraction in a uterine smooth muscle cell. , 2007, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[27]  R. FitzHugh Impulses and Physiological States in Theoretical Models of Nerve Membrane. , 1961, Biophysical journal.

[28]  T. Kawarabayashi,et al.  Effect of oxytocin on spontaneous electrical and mechanical activities in pregnant human myometrium. , 1986, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[29]  Jane Sands Robb,et al.  The normal heart , 1942 .

[30]  Matthew N. O. Sadiku,et al.  Elements of Electromagnetics , 1989 .

[31]  R. Young,et al.  Myocytes, Myometrium, and Uterine Contractions , 2007, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[32]  Peter Niederer,et al.  Three-dimensional fiber architecture of the nonpregnant human uterus determined ex vivo using magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging. , 2006, The anatomical record. Part A, Discoveries in molecular, cellular, and evolutionary biology.

[33]  W. Maner,et al.  Physiology and electrical activity of uterine contractions. , 2007, Seminars in cell & developmental biology.

[34]  Rodrigo Weber dos Santos,et al.  On the Influence of a Volume Conductor on the Orientation of Currents in a Thin Cardiac Tissue , 2003, FIMH.

[35]  Takayoshi Hosono [Fetal magnetocardiography]. , 2006, Rinsho byori. The Japanese journal of clinical pathology.

[36]  Robert Plonsey,et al.  Bioelectromagnetism: Principles and Applications of Bioelectric and Biomagnetic Fields , 1995 .