Hybrid Paired Comparison Analysis, with Applications to the Ranking of College Football Teams

Existing paired comparison models used for ranking football teams primarily focus on either wins and losses or points scored (either via each team's total or a margin of victory). While reasonable, each approach fails to produce satisfactory rankings in frequently arising situations due to its ignorance of additional data. We propose a new, hybrid model incorporating both wins and constituent scores and show that it outperforms its competitors and is robust against model mis-specification based on a series of simulation studies. We conclude by illustrating the method using the 2003-04 and 2004-05 college football seasons.

[1]  R. Prentice,et al.  A generalization of the probit and logit methods for dose response curves. , 1976, Biometrics.

[2]  R. A. Bradley,et al.  Rank Analysis of Incomplete Block Designs: I. The Method of Paired Comparisons , 1952 .

[3]  Peter McCullagh,et al.  Quasi‐Likelihood Functions , 2006 .

[4]  P. Moran On the method of paired comparisons. , 1947, Biometrika.

[5]  Alan Agresti,et al.  Categorical Data Analysis , 1991, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[6]  S. Zeger,et al.  Multivariate Regression Analyses for Categorical Data , 1992 .

[7]  H. White Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Misspecified Models , 1982 .

[8]  F. Mosteller Remarks on the method of paired comparisons: I. The least squares solution assuming equal standard deviations and equal correlations , 1951 .

[9]  S. Zeger,et al.  Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models , 1986 .

[10]  D. Harville Predictions for National Football League Games via Linear-Model Methodology , 1980 .

[11]  S. Coles,et al.  Modelling Association Football Scores and Inefficiencies in the Football Betting Market , 1997 .

[12]  Hal S Stern,et al.  Statistics and the College Football Championship , 2004 .

[13]  David Mease,et al.  A Penalized Maximum Likelihood Approach for the Ranking of College Football Teams Independent of Victory Margins , 2003 .

[14]  R. W. Wedderburn Quasi-likelihood functions, generalized linear models, and the Gauss-Newton method , 1974 .

[15]  Erich L. Lehmann,et al.  The Power of Rank Tests , 1953 .

[16]  C. Heyde Quasi-likelihood and its application : a general approach to optimal parameter estimation , 1998 .

[17]  D. Cox,et al.  An Analysis of Transformations , 1964 .

[18]  David HARViLLE,et al.  The Use of Linear-Model Methodology to Rate High School or College Football Teams , 1977 .

[19]  L. Thurstone A law of comparative judgment. , 1994 .

[20]  Roger R. Davidson,et al.  271 Note: On a Relationship between Two Representations of a Model for Paired Comparisons , 1969 .