Grooming network cohesion and the role of individuals in a captive chimpanzee group

Social network analysis offers new tools to study the social structure of primate groups. We used social network analysis to investigate the cohesiveness of a grooming network in a captive chimpanzee group (N = 17) and the role that individuals may play in it. Using data from a year‐long observation, we constructed an unweighted social network of preferred grooming interactions by retaining only those dyads that groomed above the group mean. This choice of criterion was validated by the finding that the properties of the unweighted network correlated with the properties of a weighted network (i.e. a network representing the frequency of grooming interactions) constructed from the same data. To investigate group cohesion, we tested the resilience of the unweighted grooming network to the removal of central individuals (i.e. individuals with high betweenness centrality). The network fragmented more after the removal of individuals with high betweenness centrality than after the removal of random individuals. Central individuals played a pivotal role in maintaining the network's cohesiveness, and we suggest that this may be a typical property of affiliative networks like grooming networks. We found that the grooming network correlated with kinship and age, and that individuals with higher social status occupied more central positions in the network. Overall, the grooming network showed a heterogeneous structure, yet did not exhibit scale‐free properties similar to many other primate networks. We discuss our results in light of recent findings on animal social networks and chimpanzee grooming. Am. J. Primatol. 73:758–767, 2011. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  Hal Whitehead,et al.  SOCPROG programs: analysing animal social structures , 2009, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[2]  Charlotte K. Hemelrijk,et al.  Reciprocity and interchange of grooming and ‘support’ in captive chimpanzees , 1991, Animal Behaviour.

[3]  M. Newman,et al.  Identifying the role that animals play in their social networks , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  Charlotte K. Hemelrijk,et al.  Models of, and tests for, reciprocity, unidirectionality and other social interaction patterns at a group level , 1990, Animal Behaviour.

[5]  D. Watts.  RECIPROCITY AND INTERCHANGE IN THE SOCIAL RELATIONSHIPS OF WILD MALE CHIMPANZEES , 2002 .

[6]  Julian A. Drewe,et al.  The social network structure of a wild meerkat population: 2. Intragroup interactions , 2009, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[7]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Scale-Free Networks: A Decade and Beyond , 2009, Science.

[8]  Theodore G. Manno,et al.  Social networking in the Columbian ground squirrel, Spermophilus columbianus , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[9]  P. Erdos,et al.  On the evolution of random graphs , 1984 .

[10]  D. Watts,et al.  Grooming Between Male Chimpanzees at Ngogo, Kibale National Park. II. Influence of Male Rank and Possible Competition for Partners , 2000, International Journal of Primatology.

[11]  N. Merrick.  Social grooming and play behavior of a captive group of chimpanzees , 2006, Primates.

[12]  Christophe Boesch,et al.  Long-term reciprocation of grooming in wild West African chimpanzees , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[13]  L. Barrett,et al.  The value of grooming to female primates , 2007, Primates.

[14]  Tina W. Wey,et al.  Social network analysis of animal behaviour: a promising tool for the study of sociality , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[15]  C. Sueur,et al.  Organization of Group Members at Departure Is Driven by Social Structure in Macaca , 2008, International Journal of Primatology.

[16]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Error and attack tolerance of complex networks , 2000, Nature.

[17]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Short-term group fission processes in macaques: a social networking approach , 2010, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[18]  D. Krakauer,et al.  Policing stabilizes construction of social niches in primates , 2006, Nature.

[19]  F. Aureli,et al.  Interchange of Grooming and Agonistic Support in Chimpanzees , 2006, International Journal of Primatology.

[20]  D. Watts,et al.  Grooming Between Male Chimpanzees at Ngogo, Kibale National Park. I. Partner Number and Diversity and Grooming Reciprocity , 2000, International Journal of Primatology.

[21]  H. Whitehead.  Analysing animal social structure , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[22]  H. Vries,et al.  Matman : a program for the analysis of sociometric matrices and behavioural transition matrices , 1993 .

[23]  Gabriele Schino,et al.  Grooming, competition and social rank among female primates: a meta-analysis , 2001, Animal Behaviour.

[24]  Paul Glendinning,et al.  The mathematics of motion camouflage , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[25]  A. Harcourt.  The Chimpanzees of Gombe. Patterns of Behavior, Jane Goodall. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachussets (1986), xii, +671. Price $30 , 1988 .

[26]  Ilya R. Fischhoff,et al.  Network metrics reveal differences in social organization between two fission–fusion species, Grevy’s zebra and onager , 2007, Oecologia.

[27]  M. Newman.  Analysis of weighted networks. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[28]  Bernhard Voelkl,et al.  A social network analysis of primate groups , 2009, Primates.

[29]  Robin I. M. Dunbar.  Functional significance of social grooming in primates , 1991 .

[30]  A. Pusey,et al.  Alpha male chimpanzee grooming patterns: implications for dominance “style” , 2009, American journal of primatology.

[31]  Richard James,et al.  Social networks in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata) , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[32]  Brenda McCowan,et al.  Utility of social network analysis for primate behavioral management and well-being , 2008 .

[33]  D. Krakauer,et al.  Robustness mechanisms in primate societies: a perturbation study , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[34]  F. D. Waal.  The Chimpanzee's service economy: Food for grooming , 1997 .

[35]  J. Krause,et al.  Potential banana skins in animal social network analysis , 2009, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[36]  R. Connor,et al.  Exploring Animal Social Networks, D.P. Croft, R. James, J. Krause. Princeton, New Jersey, Princeton University Press (2008), Pp. viii+192. Price $35.00 paperback , 2009 .

[37]  B. Spruijt,et al.  Ethology and neurobiology of grooming behavior. , 1992, Physiological reviews.

[38]  H. Vries.  The rowwise correlation between two proximity matrices and the partial rowwise correlation , 1993 .

[39]  David Lusseau,et al.  The emergent properties of a dolphin social network , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[40]  Denis Boyer,et al.  Association networks in spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi) , 2009, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[41]  B. Bollobás.  The evolution of random graphs , 1984 .

[42]  J. Mitani,et al.  Recent developments in the study of wild chimpanzee behavior , 2002 .