Extending the Concept of Stereotype Threat to Social Class: The Intellectual Underperformance of Students from Low Socioeconomic Backgrounds

Students from poorer families perform worse on intellectual tasks than do other students. The authors tested the stereotype threat hypothesis as a possible explanation for this difference. Students from relatively poor backgrounds, such as members of other stereotyped groups, risk confirming a negative reputation of low intellectual ability. The authors predicted that, on a stereotype-relevant test, members of this group would experience apprehension about confirming their negative reputation and that this susceptibility to the stereotype would impair their performance. The study varied stereotype threat by manipulating the instructions accompanying the test that each participant completed. When described as a measure of intellectual ability, low socioeconomic status (SES) participants performed worse than high SES participants. However, when the test was presented as nondiagnostic of intellectual ability, low SES participants' performances did not suffer, contesting claims of SES differences in intellectual ability.

[1]  J. Easterbrook The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behavior. , 1959, Psychological review.

[2]  Ray C. Rist,et al.  Student Social Class and Teacher Expectations: The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy in Ghetto Education , 1970 .

[3]  Irwin G. Sarason,et al.  Chapter 11 – EXPERIMENTAL APPROACHES TO TEST ANXIETY: ATTENTION AND THE USES OF INFORMATION , 1972 .

[4]  T. Williams Teacher prophecies and the inheritance of inequality. , 1976 .

[5]  E. E. Jones,et al.  Control of Attributions about the Self Through Self-handicapping Strategies: The Appeal of Alcohol and the Role of Underachievement , 1978 .

[6]  K. White The relation between socioeconomic status and academic achievement. , 1982 .

[7]  J. Greenberg,et al.  Determinants of reduction in intended effort as a strategy for coping with anticipated failure , 1983 .

[8]  R. Baumeister Choking under pressure: self-consciousness and paradoxical effects of incentives on skillful performance. , 1984, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[9]  R. Geen,et al.  Evaluation apprehension and response withholding in solution of anagrams , 1985 .

[10]  J. Crocker,et al.  Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma. , 1989 .

[11]  H. Ricciuti Nutrition and Mental Development , 1993 .

[12]  B. Malle,et al.  Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. , 1994 .

[13]  M. Sigman Nutrition and Child Development: More Food for Thought , 1995 .

[14]  C. Steele,et al.  Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  R. Sternberg,et al.  Intelligence: Knowns and unknowns. , 1996 .

[16]  Jacquelynne S. Eccles,et al.  Social Perception, Social Stereotypes, and Teacher Expectations: Accuracy and the Quest for the Powerful Self-Fulfilling Prophecy , 1996 .

[17]  C. Steele A threat in the air. How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. , 1997, The American psychologist.