Comparison of Fuzzy AHP Algorithms for Land Suitability Assessment

Weighted Linear Combination (WLC) is one of the most popular methods for Multiple Criteria Decision-making (MCDM) in the field of geoinformatics. A typical utilization of WLC is in land suitability assessment and optimal location detection. The application of WLC requires the determination of weights for each criterion used in the MCDM problem. In this paper, we focus on a fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) which is based on pairwise comparisons of criterion importance and, unlike the classic (crisp) AHP, it can contain uncertainty. This allows the user to include imprecise or incomplete knowledge in an MCDM problem. The theoretical part of the paper briefly describes fuzzy AHP and provides the necessary mathematical background. The practical part of the contribution is focused on testing two algorithms for weight determination in fuzzy AHP—the extent analysis method and a method based on constrained fuzzy arithmetic. The methods are described in terms of the amount of uncertainty in the result, the resulting value, and overall appropriateness. A four level fuzzy AHP problem containing one main goal, three criteria and twenty-four subcriteria is solved as a case study using both methods. Based on the results obtained, the recommendations for fuzzy AHP utilization in spatial suitability assessment are made.

[1]  Jana Talasová,et al.  A fuzzy extension of Analytic Hierarchy Process based on the constrained fuzzy arithmetic , 2016, Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making.

[2]  Imtiaz Ahmed Chandio,et al.  GIS-based analytic hierarchy process as a multicriteria decision analysis instrument: a review , 2013, Arabian Journal of Geosciences.

[3]  L. D. Hopkins,et al.  Methods for Generating Land Suitability Maps : A Comparative Evaluation , 2013 .

[4]  George J. Klir,et al.  Constrained fuzzy arithmetic: Basic questions and some answers , 1998, Soft Comput..

[5]  D. Chang Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP , 1996 .

[6]  K. Zhou,et al.  Application of fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and prediction-area (P-A) plot for mineral prospectivity mapping: a case study from the Dananhu metallogenic belt, Xinjiang, NW China , 2016, Arabian Journal of Geosciences.

[7]  Jan Brus,et al.  Urban Planner: model for optimal land use scenario modelling , 2015 .

[8]  Alessio Ishizaka,et al.  How to derive priorities in AHP: a comparative study , 2006, Central Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[9]  T. Blaschke,et al.  GIS-multicriteria decision analysis for landslide susceptibility mapping: comparing three methods for the Urmia lake basin, Iran , 2012, Natural Hazards.

[10]  W. Pedrycz,et al.  A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory , 1983 .

[11]  Reza Banai,et al.  Fuzziness in Geographical Information Systems: Contributions from the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1993, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[12]  Rehan Sadiq,et al.  Risk-based environmental decision-making using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (F-AHP) , 2006 .

[13]  Zhongsheng Hua,et al.  On the extent analysis method for fuzzy AHP and its applications , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  Aleš Vávra,et al.  Analytical material for planning in Olomouc, Czech Republic , 2016 .

[15]  A. Hezarkhani,et al.  Fuzzy analytical hierarchy process and GIS for predictive Cu porphyry potential mapping: a case study in Ahar–Arasbaran Zone (NW, Iran) , 2012, Arabian Journal of Geosciences.

[16]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  On the invalidity of fuzzifying numerical judgments in the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2007, Math. Comput. Model..

[17]  Michael Hanss,et al.  Applied Fuzzy Arithmetic: An Introduction with Engineering Applications , 2004 .

[18]  Thomas Blaschke,et al.  A GIS-based extended fuzzy multi-criteria evaluation for landslide susceptibility mapping , 2014, Comput. Geosci..

[19]  Abdolhadi Nazari,et al.  Landfill site selection by decision-making tools based on fuzzy multi-attribute decision-making method , 2012, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[20]  J. Barzilai Deriving weights from pairwise comparison matrices , 1997 .

[21]  Peter F. Fisher,et al.  A Comparison of Fuzzy AHP and Ideal Point Methods for Evaluating Land Suitability , 2011, Trans. GIS.

[22]  Piotr Jankowski,et al.  Integrating Geographical Information Systems and Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Methods , 1995, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..