Parameter Estimation Analysis of the Evaporation Method for Determining Soil Hydraulic Properties

Soil hydraulic properties are important parameters affecting water flow in variably saturated soils. We estimated the hydraulic properties from a laboratory evaporation experiment using both a parameter estimation method and the modified Wind method. The parameter estimation method combined a one-dimensional numerical solution of the Richards equation with the Marquardt-Levenberg optimization scheme. In our study we used both numerically generated data and data measured in the laboratory. Two experiments were carried out on 10-cm-high soil cores containing two different soils. Pressure heads inside the cores were measured with five tensiometers, while evaporative water loss from the top was determined by weighing the soil samples. The objective function for the parameter estimation analysis was defined in terms of the final total water volume in the core and pressure head readings by one or several tensiometers. An analysis of numerically generated data showed that the optimization method was most sensitive to the shape factor (n) and the saturated water content (θ s ) and least to the residual water content (θ r ). Pressure heads measured close to the soil surface were found to be more valuable for the parameter estimation technique than those measured at lower locations. The optimized hydraulic parameters corresponded closely with those obtained using Wind's analysis. All optimizations gave similar results for the soil hydraulic properties within the range of measured pressure heads (0 to -700 cm). Extrapolation beyond this range involved a high level of uncertainty because of high correlation between parameters θ r and n.

[1]  Y. Mualem A New Model for Predicting the Hydraulic Conductivity , 1976 .

[2]  W. R. Gardner,et al.  UNSATURATED CONDUCTIVITY AND DIFFUSIVITY MEASUREMENTS BY A CONSTANT FLUX METHOD , 1962 .

[3]  J. V. van Gils,et al.  THEORY AND SYSTEM OF AUTOMATIC DETERMINATION OF SOIL MOISTURE CHARACTERISTICS AND UNSATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITIES , 1978 .

[4]  A. SANTINI,et al.  EVALUATION OF A LABORATORY INVERSE METHOD FOR DETERMINING UNSATURATED HYDRAULIC PROPERTIES OF A SOIL UNDER DIFFERENT TILLAGE PRACTICES , 1995 .

[5]  G. P. Wind,et al.  Capillary conductivity data estimated by a simple method , 1966 .

[6]  Yonathan Bard,et al.  Nonlinear parameter estimation , 1974 .

[7]  Van Genuchten,et al.  Non-equilibrium transport parameters from miscible displacement experiments , 1981 .

[8]  C. Dirksen,et al.  Hydraulic Conductivity and Diffusivity: Laboratory Methods , 2018, SSSA Book Series.

[9]  T. Brubaker,et al.  Nonlinear Parameter Estimation , 1979 .

[10]  Feike J. Leij,et al.  The RETC code for quantifying the hydraulic functions of unsaturated soils , 1992 .

[11]  Jan W. Hopmans,et al.  Optimization of Hydraulic Functions from Transient Outflow and Soil Water Pressure Data , 1993 .

[12]  J. H. Dane,et al.  In-Situ Determination of Soil Hydraulic Properties during Drainage1 , 1983 .

[13]  R. Carsel,et al.  Developing joint probability distributions of soil water retention characteristics , 1988 .

[14]  Nunzio Romano,et al.  Spatial variability of the hydraulic properties of a volcanic soil , 1995 .

[15]  W. Yeh Review of Parameter Identification Procedures in Groundwater Hydrology: The Inverse Problem , 1986 .

[16]  Michael H. Young,et al.  Rapid Laboratory Calibration of Time Domain Reflectometry Using Upward Infiltration , 1997 .

[17]  M. Hirschi,et al.  Estimating soil hydraulic properties from soil texture. , 1980 .