MONITORING AGENTS WITH OTHER AGENTS

The principal-agent literature typically assumes that principals are unable to observe the characteristics or the actions of the agents whom they monitor. The inability of the principal to observe characteristics or actions leads to complications in the design of incentive schemes. For surveys of this literature, see Hart and Holmstrom [1987] and Rees [1985 a], [1985 b]. However, in reality, it is often not the case that agents' characteristics or effort levels are really unobservable; rather, they simply may be very costly to observe. One may choose to model high-costs actions as being infeasible actions, but in doing so, one may miss some interesting phenomena. In particular, simply because information is costly to the principal doesn't mean that it is costly to everyone. It may happen that the agents themselves are in good positions to monitor or advise each other.

[1]  James M. Malcomson,et al.  Rank-Order Contracts for a Principal with Many Agents , 1986 .

[2]  A J Robson,et al.  Efficiency in evolutionary games: Darwin, Nash and the secret handshake. , 1990, Journal of theoretical biology.

[3]  Ray Rees,et al.  The Theory of Principal and Agent: Part 2 , 1985 .

[4]  Carl P. Simon Some fine-tuning for dominant diagonal matrices , 1989 .

[5]  M. Shapiro,et al.  Stock Market Forecastability and Volatility: A Statistical Appraisal , 1989 .

[6]  E. Maskin,et al.  Monopoly with Incomplete Information , 1984 .

[7]  Bengt Holmstrom,et al.  Moral Hazard in Teams , 1982 .

[8]  T. Bergstrom,et al.  Some Simple Analytics of Peak-Load Pricing , 1991 .

[9]  Dilip Mookherjee Optimal Incentive Schemes with Many Agents , 1984 .

[10]  M. Hossain Credit for aileviation of rural poverty : The Grameen Bank in Bangladesh , 1988 .

[11]  Bengt Holmstrom,et al.  The Theory of Contracts , 1986 .

[12]  J. Tirole The Theory of Industrial Organization , 1988 .

[13]  Sanford J. Grossman,et al.  AN ANALYSIS OF THE PRINCIPAL-AGENT PROBLEM , 1983 .

[14]  Joel S. Demski,et al.  Optimal incentive contracts with multiple agents , 1984 .

[15]  S. Salant,et al.  Uniqueness Of Cournot Equilibrium: New Results From Old Methods , 1991 .

[16]  Joel S. Demski,et al.  Multi-agent control in perfectly correlated environments☆ , 1983 .

[17]  Eric Bennett Rasmusen,et al.  Mutual Banks and Stock Banks , 1988, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[18]  James A. Levinsohn,et al.  Distance, Demand, and Oligopoly Pricing , 1989 .

[19]  Bengt Holmstrom,et al.  Moral Hazard and Observability , 1979 .

[20]  John. Moore,et al.  Stopping agents from “cheating” , 1988 .

[21]  E. Rasmusen Moral Hazard in Risk-Averse Teams , 1987 .

[22]  Joel S. Demski,et al.  Incentive schemes with multiple agents and bankruptcy constraints , 1988 .

[23]  H. Bohn,et al.  Monitoring multiple agents: The role of hierarchies , 1987 .

[24]  Mark Bagnoli,et al.  Center for Research on Economic and Social Theory CREST Working Paper Carrot and Yardstick Regulation : Enhancing Market Performance with Output Prizes , 2013 .