Improved biosecurity surveillance of non-native forest insects: a review of current methods

Biosecurity surveillance has been highlighted as a key activity to discover non-native species at the initial stage of invasion. It provides an opportunity for rapidly initiating eradication measures and implementing responses to prevent spread and permanent establishment, reducing costs and damage. In importing countries, three types of biosecurity activities can be carried out: border surveillance targets the arrival stage of a non-native species at points-of-entry for commodities; post-border surveillance and containment target the establishment stage, but post-border surveillance is carried out on a large spatial scale, whereas containment is carried out around infested areas. In recent years, several surveillance approaches, such as baited traps, sentinel trees, biosurveillance with sniffer dogs or predatory wasps, electronic noses, acoustic detection, laser vibrometry, citizen science, genetic identification tools, and remote sensing, have been developed to complement routine visual inspections and aid in biosecurity capacity. Here, we review the existing literature on these tools, highlight their strengths and weaknesses, and identify the biosecurity surveillance categories and sites where each tool can be used more efficiently. Finally, we show how these tools can be integrated in a comprehensive biosecurity program and discuss steps to improve biosecurity.

[1]  Andrew M. Liebhold,et al.  Population ecology of insect invasions and their management. , 2008, Annual review of entomology.

[2]  John A. Darling,et al.  DNA-based methods for monitoring invasive species: a review and prospectus , 2007, Biological Invasions.

[3]  P. White,et al.  A new approach to stopping the spread of invasive insects and pathogens: early detection and rapid response via a global network of sentinel plantings † , 2010 .

[4]  S-S. Lu,et al.  The synergistic attractiveness effect of plant volatiles to sex pheromones in a moth , 2018 .

[5]  T. Paine,et al.  Insects and Diseases of Mediterranean Forest Systems , 2016, Springer International Publishing.

[6]  M. Fierke,et al.  First detection of Agrilus planipennis in Connecticut made by monitoring Cerceris fumipennis (Crabronidae) colonies , 2013 .

[7]  Andrew M. Liebhold,et al.  Live plant imports: the major pathway for forest insect and pathogen invasions of the US , 2012 .

[8]  N. Bârsan,et al.  Electronic nose: current status and future trends. , 2008, Chemical reviews.

[9]  Baoxin Hu,et al.  Early detection of emerald ash borer infestation using multisourced data: a case study in the town of Oakville, Ontario, Canada , 2014 .

[10]  O. Skarpaas,et al.  Timber import and the risk of forest pest introductions , 2009 .

[11]  Amy Roda,et al.  Perspective and Promise: a Century of Insect Acoustic Detection and Monitoring , 2011 .

[12]  L. Kubatko,et al.  DNA barcoding invasive insects: database roadblocks , 2012, Invertebrate Systematics.

[13]  H. Masuya,et al.  Unintentional introductions of microscopic organisms associated with forest insects , 2017, Biological Invasions.

[14]  R. Bonney,et al.  Citizen Science: A Developing Tool for Expanding Science Knowledge and Scientific Literacy , 2009 .

[15]  T. Ide,et al.  Molecular Identification of the Western Drywood Termite (Isoptera: Kalotermitidae) by Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification of DNA from Fecal Pellets. , 2016, Journal of economic entomology.

[16]  Jean J Turgeon,et al.  Managing invasive populations of Asian longhorned beetle and citrus longhorned beetle: a worldwide perspective. , 2010, Annual review of entomology.

[17]  Johan Lindström,et al.  Near real-time monitoring of insect induced defoliation in subalpine birch forests with MODIS derived NDVI , 2016 .

[18]  E. Barham The unique role of sentinel trees, botanic gardens and arboreta in safeguarding global plant health , 2016 .

[19]  Seunghwan Lee,et al.  Current status of exotic insect pests in Korea: comparing border interception and incursion during 1996-2014 , 2016 .

[20]  Koh Ee Phoon The use of dogs to detect carpet beetles (Anthrenocerus australis) : a thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Animal Science at Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand , 2015 .

[21]  V. Mastro,et al.  Multispecific trapping techniques for exotic-pest detection , 1988 .

[22]  R. Haack Intercepted Scolytidae (Coleoptera) at U.S. ports of Entry: 1985–2000 , 2001 .

[23]  Alain Roques,et al.  Tentative analysis of the interceptions of non-indigenous organisms in Europe during 1995-2004 , 2006 .

[24]  Melissa L. Thomas,et al.  Many eyes on the ground: citizen science is an effective early detection tool for biosecurity , 2017, Biological Invasions.

[25]  M. Ormsby,et al.  A review of global instruments to combat invasive alien species in forestry , 2017, Biological Invasions.

[26]  D. Chandler,et al.  Biology, Prey, and Levels of Prey Paralyzation by Cerceris fumipennis Say (Hymenoptera: Crabronidae) in New Hampshire , 2017, Entomological News.

[27]  Rebecca S Epanchin-Niell,et al.  Designing cost-efficient surveillance for early detection and control of multiple biological invaders. , 2014, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[28]  A. Lucky,et al.  Simple and Efficient Trap for Bark and Ambrosia Beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) to Facilitate Invasive Species Monitoring and Citizen Involvement , 2015, Journal of economic entomology.

[29]  M. Faccoli,et al.  Smart-traps combined with molecular on-site detection to monitor Monochamus spp. and associated pine wood nematode , 2013 .

[30]  Sven Bacher,et al.  Gaps in Border Controls Are Related to Quarantine Alien Insect Invasions in Europe , 2012, PloS one.

[31]  Warren E. Hellman,et al.  Two Novel Prey Families for the Buprestid-Hunting Wasp Cerceris fumipennis Say (Hymenoptera: Crabronidae) , 2011 .

[32]  P. Tobin,et al.  Slow the spread: a national program to manage the gypsy moth. , 2007 .

[33]  Helen E. Roy,et al.  Lessons from lady beetles: accuracy of monitoring data from US and UK citizen-science programs , 2012 .

[34]  Yuval Cohen,et al.  Toward practical acoustic red palm weevil detection , 2016, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[35]  A. Schloss,et al.  Using mobile phones to engage citizen scientists in research , 2011 .

[36]  R. W. Mankin,et al.  Applications of acoustics in insect pest management , 2012 .

[37]  A. Roques,et al.  Multi-component blends for trapping native and exotic longhorn beetles at potential points-of-entry and in forests , 2018, Journal of Pest Science.

[38]  Roberta E. Martin,et al.  Remote sensing of native and invasive species in Hawaiian forests , 2008 .

[39]  Shawn E Brooks,et al.  Ability of canine termite detectors to locate live termites and discriminate them from non-termite material. , 2003, Journal of economic entomology.

[40]  L. Marini,et al.  Improving the early detection of alien wood‐boring beetles in ports and surrounding forests , 2015 .

[41]  D. Rassati,et al.  Trapping wood boring beetles in Italian ports: a pilot study , 2013, Journal of Pest Science.

[42]  Annie Simpson,et al.  Invasive species information networks: collaboration at multiple scales for prevention, early detection, and rapid response to invasive alien species , 2009 .

[43]  D. Rassati,et al.  Alien Wood-Boring Beetles in Mediterranean Regions , 2016 .

[44]  Andrew M. Liebhold,et al.  Benefits of invasion prevention: Effect of time lags, spread rates, and damage persistence , 2015 .

[45]  Robert A. Haack,et al.  Effectiveness of the International Phytosanitary Standard ISPM No. 15 on Reducing Wood Borer Infestation Rates in Wood Packaging Material Entering the United States , 2014, PloS one.

[46]  R. Negri,et al.  Tracking the sex pheromone of codling moth against a background of host volatiles with an electronic nose , 2008 .

[47]  U. Hoyer-Tomiczek,et al.  Scent detection dogs for the Asian longhorn beetle, Anoplophora glabripennis , 2016 .

[48]  David Chesmore,et al.  Acoustic detection of regulated pests in hardwood material , 2010 .

[49]  C. Nalepa,et al.  Comparison of Buprestidae collected by Cerceris fumipennis (Hymenoptera: Crabronidae) with those collected by purple prism traps , 2015 .

[50]  J. Elkinton,et al.  Survey for Winter Moth (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) in Northeastern North America with Pheromone-Baited Traps and Hybridization with the Native Bruce Spanworm (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) , 2010 .

[51]  Alphus D. Wilson,et al.  Diverse Applications of Electronic-Nose Technologies in Agriculture and Forestry , 2013, Sensors.

[52]  Clifford S. Sadof,et al.  International variation in phytosanitary legislation and regulations governing importation of plants for planting , 2015 .

[53]  M. Ulyshen,et al.  Trap height considerations for detecting two economically important forest beetle guilds in southeastern US forests , 2017, Journal of Pest Science.

[54]  Neil Boonham,et al.  A review of pest surveillance techniques for detecting quarantine pests in Europe , 2012 .

[55]  Neil Boonham,et al.  DNA barcoding for biosecurity: case studies from the UK plant protection program. , 2016, Genome.

[56]  M. Kimberley,et al.  Interception frequency of exotic bark and ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytinae) and relationship with establishment in New Zealand and worldwide , 2006 .

[57]  B. Richardson,et al.  Alien forest insects in a warmer world and a globalised economy: impacts of changes in trade, tourism and climate on forest biosecurity. , 2010 .

[58]  A borer-specific assessment scheme for identifying sentinel trees to delimit invasive borers in urban forests. , 2015 .

[59]  P. Caley,et al.  Entry of exotic insects into Australia: Does border interception count match incursion risk? , 2015, Biological Invasions.

[60]  L. Bisschop Out of the woods: the illegal trade in tropical timber and a European trade hub , 2012 .

[61]  J. Turgeon,et al.  Discovery of Trichoferus campestris (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) in Ontario, Canada and first host record in North America , 2013, The Canadian Entomologist.

[62]  A. Tatem The worldwide airline network and the dispersal of exotic species: 2007–2010 , 2009, Ecography.

[63]  M. Kimberley,et al.  Improving the Efficiency of Lepidopteran Pest Detection and Surveillance: Constraints and Opportunities for Multiple-Species Trapping , 2012, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[64]  Elizabeth A. Boyd,et al.  Pheromone identification by proxy: identification of aggregation-sex pheromones of North American cerambycid beetles as a strategy to identify pheromones of invasive Asian congeners , 2019, Journal of Pest Science.

[65]  D. Rassati,et al.  Life history and geographical distribution of the walnut twig beetle, Pityophthorus juglandis (Coleoptera: Scolytinae), in southern Europe , 2016 .

[66]  W. C. Hoffmann,et al.  Identification of Stink Bugs Using an Electronic Nose , 2008 .

[67]  F. R. Wylie,et al.  Development of hazard site surveillance programs for forest invasive species: a case study from Brisbane, Australia , 2008 .

[68]  Ahmad Khalilian,et al.  Detecting stink bugs/damage in cotton utilizing a portable electronic nose , 2010 .

[69]  J. Grégoire,et al.  Trade patterns of the tree nursery industry in Europe and changes following findings of citrus longhorn beetle, Anoplophora chinensis Forster , 2015 .

[70]  L. Marini,et al.  Exploring the role of wood waste landfills in early detection of non-native wood-boring beetles , 2014, Journal of Pest Science.

[71]  P. Silk,et al.  Pheromone-enhanced lure blends and multiple trap heights improve detection of bark and wood-boring beetles potentially moved in solid wood packaging , 2018, Journal of Pest Science.

[72]  B. Strom,et al.  Dilution of Fluon Before Trap Surface Treatment Has No Effect on Longhorned Beetle (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) Captures , 2016, Journal of Economic Entomology.

[73]  Developing trapping protocols for wood-boring beetles associated with broadleaf trees , 2018, Journal of Pest Science.

[74]  M. Wingfield,et al.  The polyphagous shot hole borer (PSHB) and its fungal symbiont Fusarium euwallaceae: a new invasion in South Africa , 2018, Australasian Plant Pathology.

[75]  Andrew M. Liebhold,et al.  Comparison of methods for estimating the spread of a non‐indigenous species , 2007 .

[76]  R. Haack Cerambycid pests in forests and urban trees , 2017 .

[77]  S. Kumschick,et al.  Methods and approaches for the management of arthropod border incursions , 2016, Biological Invasions.

[78]  Andrew M. Liebhold,et al.  Interceptions of Nonindigenous Plant Pests at US Ports of Entry and Border Crossings Over a 17-year Period , 2006, Biological Invasions.

[79]  R. Kays,et al.  Emerging Technologies to Conserve Biodiversity. , 2015, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[80]  G. P. Robideau,et al.  Real‐time PCR identification of the ambrosia beetles, Trypodendron domesticum (L.) and Trypodendron lineatum (Olivier) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) , 2016 .

[81]  Enhancing early detection of exotic pests in agricultural and forest ecosystems using an urban-gradient framework. , 2010, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[82]  Y. Lien,et al.  Fire Ant-Detecting Canines: A Complementary Method in Detecting Red Imported Fire Ants , 2011, Journal of economic entomology.

[83]  S. Myers,et al.  Identification of wood-boring beetles (Cerambycidae and Buprestidae) intercepted in trade-associated solid wood packaging material using DNA barcoding and morphology , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[84]  Neil Boonham,et al.  On-Site Testing: Moving Decision Making from the Lab to the Field , 2014 .

[85]  Patrick Hostert,et al.  Remote sensing of forest insect disturbances: Current state and future directions , 2017, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[86]  Lars Eklundh,et al.  A new invasive insect in Sweden – Physokermes inopinatus: Tracing forest damage with satellite based remote sensing , 2012 .

[87]  D. Eyre,et al.  Variation in Inspection Efficacy by Member States of Wood Packaging Material Entering the European Union , 2018, Journal of Economic Entomology.

[88]  J. Millar,et al.  Sex and Aggregation-Sex Pheromones of Cerambycid Beetles: Basic Science and Practical Applications , 2016, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[89]  E. Barham,et al.  The International Plant Sentinel Network: a tool for Regional and National Plant Protection Organizations , 2016 .

[90]  M. Zorović,et al.  Laser vibrometry as a diagnostic tool for detecting wood-boring beetle larvae , 2014, Journal of Pest Science.

[91]  T. Ide,et al.  Molecular Identification of an Invasive Wood-Boring Insect Lyctus brunneus (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae: Lyctinae) Using Frass by Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification and Nested PCR Assays , 2016, Journal of Economic Entomology.

[92]  T. Poland,et al.  Efficacy of Fluon Conditioning for Capturing Cerambycid Beetles in Different Trap Designs and Persistence on Panel Traps Over Time , 2012, Journal of economic entomology.

[93]  A. Tofilski,et al.  Citizen monitoring of invasive species: wing morphometry as a tool for detection of alien Tetropium species , 2017 .

[94]  H. Bouwmeester,et al.  Detection of diseased plants by analysis of volatile organic compound emission. , 2011, Annual review of phytopathology.

[95]  M. Kenis,et al.  Planting Sentinel European Trees in Eastern Asia as a Novel Method to Identify Potential Insect Pest Invaders , 2015, PloS one.

[96]  R. A. Mumford,et al.  The role and challenges of new diagnostic technology in plant biosecurity , 2015, Food Security.

[97]  G. Whitelaw,et al.  Establishing the Canadian Community Monitoring Network , 2003, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[98]  S. Marshall,et al.  The use of Cerceris fumipennis (Hymenoptera: Crabronidae) for surveying and monitoring emerald ash borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) infestations in eastern North America , 2013, The Canadian Entomologist.

[99]  R. Haight,et al.  The role of the social sciences and economics in understanding and informing tree biosecurity policy and planning: a global summary and synthesis , 2017, Biological Invasions.

[100]  M. Kenis,et al.  How can alien species inventories and interception data help us prevent insect invasions? , 2007, Bulletin of entomological research.

[101]  Huajian Liu,et al.  A review of recent sensing technologies to detect invertebrates on crops , 2017, Precision Agriculture.

[102]  Jason E. Moan,et al.  Conservative Estimates of Hunting Distance in Cerceris fumipennis Say (Hymenoptera: Crabronidae) , 2013 .

[103]  Fredrik Schlyter,et al.  Sampling range, attraction range, and effective attraction radius: Estimates of trap efficiency and communication distance in coleopteran pheromone and host attractant systems 1 , 1992 .

[104]  E. Allen,et al.  Phytosanitary measures to reduce the movement of forest pests with the international trade of wood products , 2017, Biological Invasions.

[105]  K. Ryall,et al.  Detectability of the Emerald Ash Borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) in Asymptomatic Urban Trees by using Branch Samples , 2011, Environmental entomology.

[106]  D. Rassati,et al.  Fungal communities associated with bark and ambrosia beetles trapped at international harbours , 2017 .

[107]  Therese M. Poland,et al.  Attraction of the emerald ash borer to ash trees stressed by girdling, herbicide treatment, or wounding , 2009 .

[108]  Andrew M. Liebhold,et al.  Historical Accumulation of Nonindigenous Forest Pests in the Continental United States , 2010 .

[109]  R. Bashford The Development of a Port Surrounds Trapping System for the Detection of Exotic Forest Insect Pests in Australia , 2012 .

[110]  Francis Juanes,et al.  Visual and acoustic sensors for early detection of biological invasions: Current uses and future potential , 2018 .

[111]  J. Tomlinson Potential of LAMP for detection of plant pathogens. , 2008 .

[112]  V. Soroker,et al.  The use of sniffing dogs for the detection of Rhynchophorus ferrugineus , 2013, Phytoparasitica.

[113]  J. Hough‐Goldstein,et al.  Range of Attraction of Pheromone Lures and Dispersal Behavior of Cerambycid Beetles , 2016, Annals of the Entomological Society of America.

[114]  D. Rassati,et al.  National Trade can Drive Range Expansion of Bark- and Wood-Boring Beetles , 2017, Journal of Economic Entomology.

[115]  W J Harper,et al.  The strengths and weaknesses of the electronic nose. , 2001, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[116]  T. Wyatt Pheromones , 2017, Current Biology.

[117]  J. Hanula,et al.  Influence of Trap Distance From a Source Population and Multiple Traps on Captures and Attack Densities of the Redbay Ambrosia Beetle (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) , 2016, Journal of Economic Entomology.

[118]  Krista G. Hilchey,et al.  A review of citizen science and community-based environmental monitoring: issues and opportunities , 2011, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[119]  M. Neteler,et al.  Potential of remote sensing to predict species invasions , 2015 .

[120]  J. Utzinger,et al.  From laboratory to point of entry: development and implementation of a loop‐mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP)‐based genetic identification system to prevent introduction of quarantine insect species , 2018, Pest management science.

[121]  R. Redak,et al.  The Impact of Trap Type and Design Features on Survey and Detection of Bark and Woodboring Beetles and Their Associates: A Review and Meta-Analysis. , 2017, Annual review of entomology.

[122]  M. Kimberley,et al.  Nationwide survey for invasive wood-boring and bark beetles (Coleoptera) using traps baited with pheromones and kairomones , 2006 .

[123]  S. Ball,et al.  DNA barcodes for biosecurity: invasive species identification , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[124]  D. Suckling Can we replace toxicants, achieve biosecurity, and generate market position with semiochemicals? , 2015, Front. Ecol. Evol..

[125]  D. Rassati,et al.  Web‐based automatic traps for early detection of alien wood‐boring beetles , 2016 .

[126]  Antonio Cellini,et al.  Potential Applications and Limitations of Electronic Nose Devices for Plant Disease Diagnosis , 2017, Sensors.

[127]  D. Ross,et al.  Sampling range and range of attraction of Dendroctonus pseudotsugae pheromone-baited traps , 2002, The Canadian Entomologist.

[128]  Andrew M. Liebhold,et al.  Optimal surveillance and eradication of invasive species in heterogeneous landscapes. , 2012, Ecology letters.

[129]  Andrew M. Liebhold,et al.  The influence of satellite populations of emerald ash borer on projected economic costs in U.S. communities, 2010-2020. , 2011, Journal of environmental management.

[130]  T. Burgess,et al.  Urban trees: bridge-heads for forest pest invasions and sentinels for early detection , 2017, Biological Invasions.

[131]  Ilyas Potamitis,et al.  Automated Remote Insect Surveillance at a Global Scale and the Internet of Things , 2017, Robotics.

[132]  E. Brockerhoff,et al.  Common pathways by which non-native forest insects move internationally and domestically , 2018, Journal of Pest Science.

[133]  B. Cavagna,et al.  Anoplophora glabripennis infestation (col.: cerambycidae) in Italy , 2009 .

[134]  Joseph C. H. Wong,et al.  Using blends of cerambycid beetle pheromones and host plant volatiles to simultaneously attract a diversity of cerambycid species , 2012 .

[135]  Andrew M. Liebhold,et al.  Ecology of forest insect invasions , 2017, Biological Invasions.

[136]  Iqbal Zahid,et al.  Assessment of technologies and dogs for detecting insect pests in timber and forest products , 2012 .

[137]  P. Hulme An Introduction to Plant Biosecurity: Past, Present and Future , 2014 .