Early stage identification of breakthroughs at the interface of science and technology: lessons drawn from a landmark publication

Certain scholarly publications or patent publications may signal breakthroughs in basic scientific research or radical new technological developments. Are there bibliographical indicators that enable an analysis of R&D dynamics to help identify these ‘local revolutions’ in science and technology? The focus of this paper is on early stage identification of potential breakthroughs in science that may evolve into new technology. We analyse bibliographic information for a typical example of such a breakthrough to pinpoint information that has the potential to be used as bibliographic indicator. The typical example used is the landmark research paper by Novoselov et al. (Science 306(5696): 666–669, 2004) concerning graphene. After an initial accumulation of theoretical knowledge about graphene over a period of 50 years this publication of the discovery of a method to produce graphene had an immediate and significant impact on the R&D community; it provides a link between theory, experimental verification, and new technological applications. The publication of this landmark discovery marks a sharp rise in the number of scholarly publications, and not much later an increase in the number of filings for related patent applications. Noticeable within 2 years after publication is an above average influx of researchers and of organisations. Changes in the structure of co-citation term maps point to renewed interest from theoretical physicists. The analysis uncovered criteria that can help in identifying at early stage potential breakthroughs that link science and technology.

[1]  Yongtae Park,et al.  Development of New Technology Forecasting Algorithm: Hybrid Approach for Morphology Analysis and Conjoint Analysis of Patent Information , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[2]  Ismael Rafols,et al.  Local emergence and global diffusion of research technologies: An exploration of patterns of network formation , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[3]  B. Martin Foresight in science and technology , 1995 .

[4]  H. Small A Co-Citation Model of a Scientific Specialty: A Longitudinal Study of Collagen Research , 1977 .

[5]  Per Dannemand Andersen,et al.  Foresight and strategy in national research councils and research programmes , 2009, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[6]  ANTHONY F. J. VAN RAAN,et al.  Sleeping Beauties in science , 2004, Scientometrics.

[7]  A. Valle,et al.  Diffusion of nuclear energy in some developing countries , 2014 .

[8]  Charles E. Berkoff,et al.  A very early warning system for the rapid identification and transfer of new technology , 1977, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[9]  The Sources of Invention. , 1958 .

[10]  P. Wallace The Band Theory of Graphite , 1947 .

[11]  David J. Hand,et al.  Mining the past to determine the future: Problems and possibilities , 2009 .

[12]  S. G. Deshmukh,et al.  Matching of technological forecasting technique to a technology , 2002 .

[13]  P. Andel Anatomy of the Unsought Finding. Serendipity: Orgin, History, Domains, Traditions, Appearances, Patterns and Programmability , 1994, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[14]  Joseph F. Coates,et al.  Technological forecasting: 1970–1993 , 1994 .

[15]  Alan L. Porter,et al.  On the Future of Technological Forecasting , 2001 .

[16]  Alan L. Porter,et al.  Tech Mining: Exploiting Science and Technology Information Resources , 2006 .

[17]  Yi-Ning Tu,et al.  Indices of novelty for emerging topic detection , 2012, Inf. Process. Manag..

[18]  Robert J. W. Tijssen Discarding the 'basic science/applied science' dichotomy: A knowledge utilization triangle classification system of research journals , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[19]  Tugrul U. Daim,et al.  Forecasting emerging technologies: Use of bibliometrics and patent analysis , 2006 .

[20]  J. L. Salmeron,et al.  Foresighting key areas in the Information Technology industry , 2008 .

[21]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[22]  Jonathan Adams,et al.  Early citation counts correlate with accumulated impact , 2005, Scientometrics.

[23]  Carlos Castillo-Chavez,et al.  Population modeling of the emergence and development of scientific fields , 2008, Scientometrics.

[24]  Daniel E Koshland The Cha-Cha-Cha Theory of Scientific Discovery , 2007, Science.

[25]  Peg Young,et al.  Technological growth curves. A competition of forecasting models , 1993 .

[26]  Yue Chen,et al.  Towards an explanatory and computational theory of scientific discovery , 2009, J. Informetrics.

[27]  Shu-Hsuan Chang,et al.  A hybrid selection model for emerging technology , 2010 .

[28]  Laurel L. Haak,et al.  Breakthrough Paper Indicator: early detection and measurement of ground-breaking research , 2012, CRIS.

[29]  Andre K. Geim,et al.  Electric Field Effect in Atomically Thin Carbon Films , 2004, Science.

[30]  Andre K. Geim,et al.  The rise of graphene. , 2007, Nature materials.

[31]  Laurel L. Haak,et al.  Predicting highly cited papers: A Method for Early Detection of Candidate Breakthroughs , 2014 .

[32]  Nigel Meade,et al.  Technological Forecasting-Model Selection, Model Stability, and Combining Models , 1998 .

[33]  H. Grupp,et al.  Technology foresight using a Delphi approach: a Japanese‐German co‐operation , 1994 .

[34]  Hariolf Grupp,et al.  At the Crossroads in Laser Medicine and Polyimide Chemistry: Patent Assessment of the Expansion of Knowledge , 1992 .