Manipulation of visual information affects control strategy during a visuomotor tracking task

&NA; Proper understanding of motor control requires insight into the extent and manner in which task performance and control strategy are influenced by various aspects of visual information. We therefore systematically manipulated the visual presentation (i.e., scaling factor and optical flow density) of a visuomotor tracking task without changing the task itself, and investigated the effect on performance, effort, motor control strategy (i.e., anticipatory or corrective steering) and underlying neuromechanical parameters (i.e., intrinsic muscle stiffness and damping, and proprioceptive and visual feedback). Twenty healthy participants controlled the left‐right position of a virtual car (by means of wrist rotations in a haptic robot) to track a slightly curved virtual road (presented on a 60” LED screen), while small torque perturbations were applied to the wrist (1.25–20 Hz multisine) for quantification of the neuromechanical parameters. This visuomotor tracking task was performed in conditions with low/medium/high scaling factor and low/high optical flow density. Task performance was high in all conditions (tracking accuracy 96.6%–100%); a higher scaling factor was associated with slightly better performance. As expected, participants did adapt their control strategy and the use of proprioceptive and visual feedback in response to changes in the visual presentation. These findings indicate that effects of visual representation on motor behavior should be taken into consideration in designing, interpreting and comparing experiments on motor control in health and disease. In future studies, these insights might be exploited to assess the sensory‐motor adaptability in various clinical conditions. HighlightsSystematic manipulation of scaling and optical flow affects task performance.Visual manipulations induce adaptation of control strategy.Visual manipulations affect the use of proprioceptive and visual feedback.

[1]  David A. Abbink,et al.  A rigorous model of reflex function indicates that position and force feedback are flexibly tuned to position and force tasks , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  L Glass,et al.  Effect of manipulating visual feedback parameters on eye and finger movements. , 1995, The International journal of neuroscience.

[3]  J. Krakauer,et al.  Explicit and Implicit Contributions to Learning in a Sensorimotor Adaptation Task , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  Andy P. Field,et al.  Discovering Statistics Using SPSS , 2000 .

[5]  F. Colavita Human sensory dominance , 1974 .

[6]  Frans C. T. van der Helm,et al.  Identification of intrinsic and reflexive components of human arm dynamics during postural control , 2002, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[7]  Zoubin Ghahramani,et al.  Computational principles of movement neuroscience , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[8]  N L Goggin,et al.  Age-related differences in the control of spatial aiming movements. , 1992, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[9]  F. V. D. Helm,et al.  Quantification of intrinsic and reflexive properties during multijoint arm posture , 2006, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[10]  K. Newell,et al.  Visual information gain and the regulation of constant force levels , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[11]  Winfred Mugge,et al.  NMClab, a model to assess the contributions of muscle visco-elasticity and afferent feedback to joint dynamics. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  M. Ernst,et al.  Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion , 2002, Nature.

[13]  D. McCrea,et al.  Shared reflex pathways from Ib tendon organ afferents and Ia muscle spindle afferents in the cat. , 1983, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  R W Cumming,et al.  The role of optical expansion patterns in locomotor control. , 1973, The American journal of psychology.

[15]  Frans C. T. van der Helm,et al.  Adaptation of reflexive feedback during arm posture to different environments , 2002, Biological Cybernetics.

[16]  M. Goodale,et al.  Separate visual pathways for perception and action , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[17]  Alfred C. Schouten,et al.  NeuroControl of movement: system identification approach for clinical benefit , 2015, Front. Integr. Neurosci..

[18]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  System Identification: Theory for the User , 1987 .

[19]  Terence D. Sanger,et al.  Does dystonia always include co-contraction? A study of unconstrained reaching in children with primary and secondary dystonia , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[20]  Michel Verhaegen,et al.  LPV subspace identification of time-variant joint impedance , 2013, 2013 6th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER).

[21]  Eli Brenner,et al.  The latency for correcting a movement depends on the visual attribute that defines the target , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[22]  R. Miall,et al.  Adaptation to visual feedback delays in manual tracking: evidence against the Smith Predictor model of human visually guided action , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[23]  R. Miall,et al.  Intermittency in human manual tracking tasks. , 1993, Journal of motor behavior.

[24]  M. M. van Paassen,et al.  Modelling Human Visual Perception and Control of the Direction of Self-Motion , 2005 .

[25]  Li-Qun Zhang,et al.  Simultaneous and nonlinear identification of mechanical and reflex properties of human elbow joint muscles , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[26]  F.C.T. van der Helm,et al.  Reduced Power Method: how to evoke low-bandwidth behaviour while estimating full-bandwidth dynamics , 2007, 2007 IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[27]  D. McCrea,et al.  Inhibitory interactions between interneurones in reflex pathways from group Ia and group Ib afferents in the cat. , 1983, The Journal of physiology.

[28]  Frans C. T. van der Helm,et al.  Quantifying Proprioceptive Reflexes During Position Control of the Human Arm , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[29]  M. Reiner,et al.  Sensory dominance in combinations of audio, visual and haptic stimuli , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[30]  I W Hunter,et al.  System identification of human joint dynamics. , 1990, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[31]  Richard A. Schmidt,et al.  Motor learning and performance : a situation-based learning approach , 2008 .