'The Appliance of Science?': The Theory and Practice of Crime Intelligence Analysis

Intelligence analysis has emerged as an important component of contemporary policing strategies. Drawing upon qualitative data and a perspective informed by some of the concepts associated with the sociology of scientific knowledge, this paper provides an epistemologically oriented critique of some of the key techniques associated with crime analysis. Data presented suggest that crime analysis: is used in line with traditional modes of policing; is a way of claiming 'scientific objectivity' for police actions; and is largely shaped by police perspectives on data. It is argued that the sense of enhanced objectivity often attributed to the products of 'intelligence work' is frequently overstated. The products of crime analysis are better understood as an artefact of the data and methods used in their construction, rather than providing an accurate representation of any crime problems.

[1]  H. Garfinkel,et al.  I.1 The Work of a Discovering Science Construed with Materials from the Optically Discovered Pulsar , 1981 .

[2]  Marilyn B. Peterson.  Applications in Criminal Analysis: A Sourcebook , 1994 .

[3]  Mike Maguire,et al.  Policing by risks and targets: Some dimensions and implications of intelligence‐led crime control , 2000 .

[4]  M. Heidegger.  The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays , 1977 .

[5]  K. Knorr-Cetina.  The Manufacture of Knowledge , 1981 .

[6]  Martin Innes,et al.  Investigating Murder: Detective Work and the Police Response to Criminal Homicide , 2003 .

[7]  J.-P. Brodeur.  HIGH POLICING AND LOW POLICING: REMARKS ABOUT THE POLICING OF POLITICAL ACTIVITIES* , 1983 .

[8]  P. Guttorp,et al.  The Taming of Chance. , 1992 .

[9]  R. Ericson,et al.  Policing the Risk Society , 1997 .

[10]  Nikolas Rose,et al.  Inventing Our Selves: Psychology, Power, and Personhood , 1998 .

[11]  Gary T. Marx,et al.  Undercover: Police Surveillance in America , 1988 .

[12]  M. Lynch,et al.  Scientific Practice and Ordinary Action , 1993 .

[13]  I. Taylor.  Crime in Context: A Critical Criminology of Market Societies , 1999 .

[14]  David L. Altheide.  Qualitative Media Analysis , 1996 .

[15]  A. Giddens.  The Constitution of Society , 1985 .

[16]  John Scott.  Social Network Analysis , 1988 .

[17]  K. Weick.  FROM SENSEMAKING IN ORGANIZATIONS , 2021, The New Economic Sociology.

[18]  L. Johnston.  Policing Britain: Risk, Security and Governance , 1999 .

[19]  Nigel Coles,et al.  It's Not What You Know-It's Who You Know that Counts. Analysing Serious Crime Groups as Social Networks , 2001 .

[20]  Simon A. Cole,et al.  Suspect Identities , 2001 .

[21]  V. Ruggiero.  Crime and Markets: Essays in Anti-Criminology , 2000 .

[22]  John Seely Brown,et al.  Book Reviews : The Social Life of Information By John Seely Brown and Paul Duguid. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2000. 320 pages , 2000 .

[23]  Mark S. Granovetter.  T H E S T R E N G T H O F WEAK TIES: A NETWORK THEORY REVISITED , 1983 .