Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF): a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

[1]  Xiaolong Shen,et al.  Radiographic Analysis of One-level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MI-TLIF) With Unilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases , 2013, Clinical spine surgery.

[2]  Hailong Zhang,et al.  Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation in lumbar interbody fusion: A meta-analysis of complication and fusion rate , 2014, Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery.

[3]  G. Qiu,et al.  Comparing minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar disease: a meta‐analysis , 2013, Chinese medical journal.

[4]  S. Kuh,et al.  Unilateral versus bilateral percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. , 2013, Neurosurgical focus.

[5]  R. Fessler,et al.  Outcome following unilateral versus bilateral instrumentation in patients undergoing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a single-center randomized prospective study. , 2013, Neurosurgical focus.

[6]  Hua-zi Xu,et al.  Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a meta-analysis based on the current evidence , 2013, European Spine Journal.

[7]  A. Tsahtsarlis,et al.  Minimally invasive transforaminal lumber interbody fusion and degenerative lumbar spine disease , 2012, European Spine Journal.

[8]  Hua-ming Xue,et al.  Comparison of unilateral versus bilateral instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative lumbar diseases. , 2012, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[9]  R. Härtl,et al.  Minimal Access Versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Meta-Analysis of Fusion Rates , 2010, Spine.

[10]  T. J. Lim,et al.  Biomechanical comparison of single-level posterior versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions with bilateral pedicle screw fixation: segmental stability and the effects on adjacent motion segments. , 2010, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[11]  Claire Bombardier,et al.  2009 Updated Method Guidelines for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Back Review Group , 2009, Spine.

[12]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration , 2009, Annals of Internal Medicine [serial online].

[13]  Choon-Sung Lee,et al.  Risk factors for adjacent segment disease after lumbar fusion , 2008, European Spine Journal.

[14]  C. Schizas,et al.  Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: evaluating initial experience , 2009, International Orthopaedics.

[15]  N. Haas,et al.  Biomechanical evaluation of different asymmetrical posterior stabilization methods for minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. , 2008, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[16]  Teera Tangviriyapaiboon,et al.  Mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. , 2008, Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet.

[17]  N. Crawford,et al.  Biomechanics of unilateral compared with bilateral lumbar pedicle screw fixation for stabilization of unilateral vertebral disease. , 2008, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[18]  V. Vougioukas,et al.  PERCUTANEOUS TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION FOR THE TREATMENT OF DEGENERATIVE LUMBAR INSTABILITY , 2007, Neurosurgery.

[19]  Y. Katayama,et al.  NEURENTERIC CYST ARISING IN THE HIGH CONVEXITY PARIETAL LESION: CASE REPORT , 2007, Neurosurgery.

[20]  Jonathan A Tuttle,et al.  Paramedian approach for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with unilateral pedicle screw fixation. Technical note and preliminary report on 47 cases. , 2006, Neurosurgical focus.

[21]  H. Deutsch,et al.  Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with unilateral pedicle screw fixation. , 2006, Neurosurgical focus.

[22]  Jean-Pierre Mobasser,et al.  Unilateral pedicle screw instrumentation for minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. , 2006, Neurosurgical focus.

[23]  Kent N Bachus,et al.  Less invasive posterior fixation method following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a biomechanical analysis. , 2006, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[24]  D. Polly,et al.  Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Clinical and Radiographic Results and Complications in 100 Consecutive Patients , 2005, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[25]  Kevin T Foley,et al.  Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF): Technical Feasibility and Initial Results , 2005, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[26]  Viola Bullmann,et al.  Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a safe technique with satisfactory three to five year results , 2005, European Spine Journal.

[27]  Paul Park,et al.  Adjacent Segment Disease after Lumbar or Lumbosacral Fusion: Review of the Literature , 2004, Spine.

[28]  S. Siegler,et al.  Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: The Effect of Various Instrumentation Techniques on the Flexibility of the Lumbar Spine , 2004, Spine.

[29]  Kevin T Foley,et al.  Advances in minimally invasive spine surgery. , 2002, Clinical neurosurgery.

[30]  M. Oremus,et al.  Interrater Reliability of the Modified Jadad Quality Scale for Systematic Reviews of Alzheimer’s Disease Drug Trials , 2001, Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders.

[31]  K. Suk,et al.  Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation in lumbar spinal fusion. , 2000, Spine.