The Medial Temporal Lobe and the Left Inferior Prefrontal Cortex Jointly Support Interference Resolution in Verbal Working Memory

During working memory retrieval, proactive interference (PI) can be induced by semantic similarity and episodic familiarity. Here, we used fMRI to test hypotheses about the role of the left inferior frontal gyrus (LIFG) and the medial temporal lobe (MTL) regions in successful resolution of PI. Participants studied six-word lists and responded to a recognition probe after a short distracter period. We induced semantic PI by using study lists containing words within the same semantic category (e.g., animals). We also measured PI induced by recent study, which should increase episodic familiarity, by comparing recent negative probes (lures studied in previous trial) to distant negative probes (lures that had not been presented within a block). Resolving both types of PI resulted in enhanced activation in LIFG and MTL regions. We propose that the LIFG and the MTL support successful resolution of interference via controlled retrieval processes that serve to recover detailed episodic (e.g., list-specific or source) information: Specifically, the data suggest that BOLD activation in the LIFG reflects the deployment of controlled retrieval operations, regardless of whether the retrieval attempt succeeds in recovering the target information, whereas MTL activation specifically reflects access to relevant episodic information that serves to successfully resolve PI.

[1]  Richard F. Dillon,et al.  Proactive Interference in Short-Term Recognition and Recall Memory. , 1972 .

[2]  Katherine A. Rawson,et al.  Category Norms: An Updated and Expanded Version of the Battig and Montague (1969) Norms. , 2004 .

[3]  Jason P. Mitchell,et al.  Multiple routes to memory: Distinct medial temporal lobe processes build item and source memories , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  David Badre,et al.  Frontal lobe mechanisms that resolve proactive interference. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[5]  Lila Davachi,et al.  Behavioral / Systems / Cognitive Differential Encoding Mechanisms for Subsequent Associative Recognition and Free Recall , 2012 .

[6]  J. Jonides,et al.  Brain mechanisms of proactive interference in working memory , 2006, Neuroscience.

[7]  L. Squire,et al.  Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) Activity in the Hippocampal Region during Recognition Memory , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  Clayton E. Curtis,et al.  Mechanisms of Conflict Resolution in Prefrontal Cortex , 2009 .

[9]  Florin Dolcos,et al.  Similarities and Differences in the Neural Correlates of Episodic Memory Retrieval and Working Memory , 2002, NeuroImage.

[10]  Anthony D Wagner,et al.  Memory orientation and success: separable neurocognitive components underlying episodic recognition , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[11]  Barry H. Cohen Explaining Psychological Statistics , 2013 .

[12]  Ellen M. Migo,et al.  Associative memory and the medial temporal lobes , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  B. Postle,et al.  Prefrontal cortex and the mediation of proactive interference in working memory , 2004, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[14]  M. Watkins,et al.  Buildup of Proactive Inhibition as a Cue-Overload Effect. , 1975 .

[15]  Irene P. Kan,et al.  Selection from perceptual and conceptual representations , 2004, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[16]  Michael C. Anderson,et al.  Interference and inhibition in memory retrieval. , 1996 .

[17]  T C Gunter,et al.  Dissociable brain mechanisms for inhibitory control: effects of interference content and working memory capacity. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[18]  Robert A. Koeppe,et al.  Age Differences in Behavior and PET Activation Reveal Differences in Interference Resolution in Verbal Working Memory , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[19]  Theo G. M. van Erp,et al.  Hippocampal activations during encoding and retrieval in a verbal working memory paradigm , 2005, NeuroImage.

[20]  O. Krastoshevsky,et al.  Hippocampal Contributions to Episodic Encoding : Insights From Relational and Item-Based Learning , 2002 .

[21]  Brian McElree,et al.  Proactive Interference Slows Recognition by Eliminating Fast Assessments of Familiarity. , 2007 .

[22]  M. Farah,et al.  Role of left inferior prefrontal cortex in retrieval of semantic knowledge: a reevaluation. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  S. Thompson-Schill Neuroimaging studies of semantic memory: inferring “how” from “where” , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[24]  Delos D. Wickens,et al.  Encoding Categories of Words: An Empirical Approach to Meaning. , 1970 .

[25]  R. Poldrack,et al.  Dissociable Controlled Retrieval and Generalized Selection Mechanisms in Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex , 2005, Neuron.

[26]  John Birtwistle,et al.  Proactive inhibition in free recall. , 1971 .

[27]  R. G. Crowder Principles of learning and memory , 1977 .

[28]  B. Dosher,et al.  Serial Retrieval Processes in the Recovery of Order Information , 1993 .

[29]  David Badre,et al.  Left ventrolateral prefrontal cortex and the cognitive control of memory , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[30]  C Brock Kirwan,et al.  Overcoming interference: an fMRI investigation of pattern separation in the medial temporal lobe. , 2007, Learning & memory.

[31]  K. Paller,et al.  Observing the transformation of experience into memory , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[32]  A. Yonelinas The Nature of Recollection and Familiarity: A Review of 30 Years of Research , 2002 .

[33]  S. Monsell Recency, immediate recognition memory, and reaction time , 1978, Cognitive Psychology.

[34]  Tim Curran,et al.  Retrieval dynamics of recognition and frequency judgments: Evidence for separate processes of familiarity and recall. , 1994 .

[35]  C. Curtis,et al.  BRAIN IMAGING NEUROREPORT , 1999 .

[36]  Bradley R Postle,et al.  The neural bases of the effects of item-nonspecific proactive interference in working memory , 2004, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[37]  David A. Caulton,et al.  Retrieval dynamics in recognition and list discrimination: Further evidence of separate processes of familiarity and recall , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[38]  B. Underwood,et al.  Proactive inhibition in short-term retention of single items , 1962 .

[39]  L L Jacoby,et al.  Isolating the contributions of familiarity and source information to item recognition: a time course analysis. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[40]  Katsuyuki Sakai,et al.  Prefrontal selection and medial temporal lobe reactivation in retrieval of short-term verbal information. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[41]  B. McElree,et al.  Attended and Non-Attended States in Working Memory: Accessing Categorized Structures , 1998 .

[42]  Giulio Tononi,et al.  Direct evidence for a prefrontal contribution to the control of proactive interference in verbal working memory , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[43]  T. Braver,et al.  Explaining the many varieties of working memory variation: Dual mechanisms of cognitive control. , 2007 .

[44]  Lila Davachi,et al.  Working Memory Retrieval: Contributions of the Left Prefrontal Cortex, the Left Posterior Parietal Cortex, and the Hippocampus , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[45]  E. Miller,et al.  An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[46]  J. Jonides,et al.  Inhibition in verbal working memory revealed by brain activation. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  Robert T. Knight,et al.  Effects of frontal lobe damage on interference effects in working memory , 2002, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[48]  B. Knowlton,et al.  Remembering episodes: a selective role for the hippocampus during retrieval , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[49]  Jean-Luc Anton,et al.  Region of interest analysis using an SPM toolbox , 2010 .

[50]  J. Moake,et al.  This article has been cited by other articles , 2003 .

[51]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Medial Temporal Lobe Activity Associated with Active Maintenance of Novel Information , 2001, Neuron.

[52]  E E Smith,et al.  The neural substrate and temporal dynamics of interference effects in working memory as revealed by event-related functional MRI. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[53]  Sharon L. Thompson-Schill,et al.  The Price of Fame: The Impact of Stimulus Familiarity on Proactive Interference Resolution , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[54]  M. Humphreys,et al.  Cuing effects in short-term recall , 1996, Memory & cognition.

[55]  H. Eichenbaum,et al.  The medial temporal lobe and recognition memory. , 2007, Annual review of neuroscience.

[56]  L. Davachi Item, context and relational episodic encoding in humans , 2006, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[57]  Jemett L. Desmond,et al.  Semantic encoding and retrieval in the left inferior prefrontal cortex: a functional MRI study of task difficulty and process specificity , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[58]  Charan Ranganath,et al.  Opinion TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.9 No.8 August 2005 Doubts about double dissociations between short- and long-term memory , 2022 .

[59]  B. Dosher,et al.  Serial position and set size in short-term memory: The time course of recognition , 1989 .

[60]  John Jonides,et al.  Dissociable neural mechanisms underlying response-based and familiarity-based conflict in working memory , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[61]  Maureen E. O'Neill,et al.  Retrieval Cues and Release from Proactive Inhibition. , 1976 .

[62]  Marc W Howard,et al.  The temporal context model in spatial navigation and relational learning: toward a common explanation of medial temporal lobe function across domains. , 2005, Psychological review.

[63]  Irene P. Kan,et al.  Verb generation in patients with focal frontal lesions: a neuropsychological test of neuroimaging findings. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[64]  N. Tzourio-Mazoyer,et al.  Automated Anatomical Labeling of Activations in SPM Using a Macroscopic Anatomical Parcellation of the MNI MRI Single-Subject Brain , 2002, NeuroImage.