Shift of attention to the body location of distracters is mediated by perceptual load in sustained somatosensory attention

We investigated the impact of task difficulty on neuronal facilitation of to-be-attended somatosensory vibrotactile stimuli and transient tactile distracters during sustained attention. In Experiment 1, we employed an easy detection task and in Experiment 2 a challenging discrimination task. Sustained attention was manipulated by presenting vibrotactile stimuli simultaneously to the index fingers of both hands for a period of 3s. These stimuli elicited the steady-state somatosensory evoked potential (SSSEP). Subjects attended to one body side and had to detect target-stimuli that were embedded in the ongoing vibratory streams. When subjects discriminated target-stimuli we found increased SSSEP amplitudes of the to-be-attended vibrotactile stream and greater N140 amplitudes of the somatosensory evoked potential (SEP). During stimulus detection no such facilitation of the SSSEP was found. Greater N140 amplitudes elicited by to-be-ignored distracters indicated that they pull attention to that body location under conditions of low load.

[1]  V. Mountcastle,et al.  The sense of flutter-vibration: comparison of the human capacity with response patterns of mechanoreceptive afferents from the monkey hand. , 1968, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  C Tomberg,et al.  Mapping early somatosensory evoked potentials in selective attention: critical evaluation of control conditions used for titrating by difference the cognitive P30, P40, P100 and N140. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[3]  Matthias M. Müller,et al.  Attentional modulation of the human somatosensory evoked potential in a trial-by-trial spatial cueing and sustained spatial attention task measured with high density 128 channels EEG. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[4]  Gabriel Curio,et al.  Spatial attention related SEP amplitude modulations covary with BOLD signal in S1--a simultaneous EEG--fMRI study. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[5]  Hiroki Nakata,et al.  Differential modulation of temporal and frontal components of the somatosensory N140 and the effect of interstimulus interval in a selective attention task. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[6]  M Hämäläinen,et al.  Somatosensory evoked cerebral magnetic fields from SI and SII in man. , 1984, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[7]  D Robertson,et al.  Differential enhancement of early and late components of the cerebral somatosensory evoked potentials during forced‐paced cognitive tasks in man , 1977, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  C. Shagass,et al.  Somatosensory evoked potential changes with a selective attention task. , 1982, Psychophysiology.

[9]  Hiroki Nakata,et al.  Passive enhancement of the somatosensory P100 and N140 in an active attention task using deviant alone condition , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[10]  Martin Eimer,et al.  The attentional selection of spatial and non-spatial attributes in touch: ERP evidence for parallel and independent processes , 2004, Biological Psychology.

[11]  El-Mehdi Meftah,et al.  Independent controls of attentional influences in primary and secondary somatosensory cortex. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  J E Desmedt,et al.  The cognitive P40, N60 and P100 components of somatosensory evoked potentials and the earliest electrical signs of sensory processing in man. , 1983, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[13]  H. Jasper,et al.  The ten-twenty electrode system of the International Federation. The International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. , 1999, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[14]  Joseph B. Hopfinger,et al.  Interactions between endogenous and exogenous attention on cortical visual processing , 2006, NeuroImage.

[15]  R. Romo,et al.  Frequency discrimination in the sense of flutter: psychophysical measurements correlated with postcentral events in behaving monkeys , 1990, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[16]  N. Lavie.  Distracted and confused?: Selective attention under load , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[17]  Matthias M. Müller,et al.  Concurrent recording of steady-state and transient event-related potentials as indices of visual-spatial selective attention , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[18]  C A Grimbergen,et al.  High-quality recording of bioelectric events , 1990, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[19]  Shozo Tobimatsu,et al.  Differential temporal coding of the vibratory sense in the hand and foot in man , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[20]  Martin Eimer,et al.  Altered tactile spatial attention in the early blind , 2007, Brain Research.

[21]  Jon Driver,et al.  Multimodal spatial constraints on tactile selective attention. , 1996 .

[22]  B. Julesz,et al.  Detection versus Discrimination of Visual Orientation , 1984, Perception.

[23]  S Pollmann,et al.  ERP and fMRI correlates of endogenous and exogenous focusing of visual‐spatial attention , 2006, The European journal of neuroscience.

[24]  G. D. Goff.  Differential discrimination of frequency of cutaneous mechanical vibration. , 1967, Journal of experimental psychology.

[25]  Matthias M. Müller,et al.  Sustained spatial attention to vibration is mediated in primary somatosensory cortex , 2007, NeuroImage.

[26]  A Z Snyder,et al.  Steady-state vibration evoked potentials: descriptions of technique and characterization of responses. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[27]  Simon J Graham,et al.  Activation in SI and SII: the influence of vibrotactile amplitude during passive and task-relevant stimulation. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[28]  Martin Eimer,et al.  Effects of hand posture on preparatory control processes and sensory modulations in tactile-spatial attention , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[29]  M. Eimer,et al.  Shifts of attention in the early blind: An ERP study of attentional control processes in the absence of visual spatial information , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[30]  Martin Eimer,et al.  Covert attention in touch: behavioral and ERP evidence for costs and benefits. , 2005, Psychophysiology.

[31]  Matthias M. Müller,et al.  Selective spatial attention to left or right hand flutter sensation modulates the steady-state somatosensory evoked potential. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[32]  H Hämäläinen,et al.  Human somatosensory evoked potentials to mechanical pulses and vibration: contributions of SI and SII somatosensory cortices to P50 and P100 components. , 1990, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[33]  Hiroshi Shibasaki,et al.  Attention modulates both primary and second somatosensory cortical activities in humans: a magnetoencephalographic study. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[34]  Shozo Tobimatsu,et al.  Steady-state vibration somatosensory evoked potentials: physiological characteristics and tuning function , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[35]  Y. Nakajima,et al.  Probability and Interstimulus Interval Effects on The N140 and the P300 Components of Somatosensory Erps , 2000, The International journal of neuroscience.

[36]  J. Polich.  Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[37]  C. A. Grimbergen,et al.  HIGH QUALITY RECORDING OF BIOELECTRIC EVENTS . I : INTERFERENCE REDUCTION , THEORY AND PRACTICE , 2009 .

[38]  Hiroki Nakata,et al.  Active attention modulates passive attention-related neural responses to sudden somatosensory input against a silent background , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[39]  V. Mountcastle,et al.  Capacities of humans and monkeys to discriminate vibratory stimuli of different frequency and amplitude: a correlation between neural events and psychological measurements. , 1975, Journal of neurophysiology.

[40]  S. Folger,et al.  EEG evidence of stimulus-directed response dynamics in human somatosensory cortex , 1999, Brain Research.

[41]  F. Mauguière,et al.  Mapping study of somatosensory evoked potentials during selective spatial attention. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[42]  M. Hollins,et al.  Perceived intensity of vibrotactile stimuli: the role of mechanoreceptive channels. , 1996, Somatosensory & motor research.

[43]  H Hämäläinen,et al.  Is the somatosensory N250 related to deviance discrimination or conscious target detection? , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[44]  M. Trulsson,et al.  Periodic microstimulation of single mechanoreceptive afferents produces frequency-following responses in human EEG. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[45]  E. Donchin,et al.  Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? , 1988, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[46]  R. Dolan,et al.  Attentional load and sensory competition in human vision: modulation of fMRI responses by load at fixation during task-irrelevant stimulation in the peripheral visual field. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[47]  P. Michie,et al.  The effects of spatial selective attention on the somatosensory event-related potential. , 1987, Psychophysiology.

[48]  M. Eimer,et al.  Modulations of early somatosensory ERP components by transient and sustained spatial attention , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[49]  M. Pinsk,et al.  Attention modulates responses in the human lateral geniculate nucleus , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[50]  Stefan Treue,et al.  Temporal dynamics of neuronal modulation during exogenous and endogenous shifts of visual attention in macaque area MT , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.