Thermal cycling distortion of metal ceramics: Part II--Etiology.

The three-dimensional geometry of conventional fixed prostheses complicates the study of the thermal cycling distortion in metal ceramic alloys. Any explanation of the etiology of thermal cycling distortion in metal ceramic restorations must account for the observed magnitude, timing, and direction of the deformation. The simplified experimental geometry developed in Part I was applied to elucidate the etiologic factors involved in metal ceramic deformation. Techniques to minimize the thermal cycling distortion were also studied. It was found that all of the significant distortion occurred during the first thermal cycling of the alloy (oxidation) and that no distortion resulted from the application of body porcelain. The specimens that were cold worked and then oxidized had significantly more distortion than any other group. A significant reduction in distortion was observed when the initial thermal cycling was completed before the specimens were cold worked. It was determined that the release of casting- and cold working-induced stresses had a synergistic effect.

[1]  H. Wilson,et al.  Metal-ceramics. Principles and methods of Makoto Yamamoto , 1987 .

[2]  Robert E. Reed-Hill,et al.  Physical Metallurgy Principles , 1972 .

[3]  K J Anusavice,et al.  Effect of Metal Design on Marginal Distortion of Metal-Ceramic Crowns , 1984, Journal of dental research.

[4]  S A Aquilino,et al.  Change in marginal fit as related to margin design, alloy type, and porcelain proximity in porcelain-fused-to-metal restorations. , 1988, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[5]  H. Strating,et al.  Evaluation of the marginal integrity of ceramometal restorations: Part II. , 1981, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[6]  David S. Shelby Practical considerations and design of porcelain fused to metal , 1962 .

[7]  C W Svare,et al.  The effect of repeated firings and strength on marginal distortion in two ceramometal systems. , 1981, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[8]  G. Mumford THE PORCELAIN FUSED TO METAL RESTORATION. , 1965, Dental clinics of North America.

[9]  J. Tuccillo,et al.  Shear Stress Measurements at a Dental Porcelain-Gold Bond Interface , 1972, Journal of dental research.

[10]  J I Nicholls,et al.  Distortion related to margin design in porcelain-fused-to-metal restorations. , 1980, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[11]  M. Silver,et al.  An evaluation and comparison of porcelains fused to cast metals , 1960 .

[12]  J I Nicholls,et al.  Distortion of ceramometal fixed partial dentures during the firing cycle. , 1981, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[13]  J. Searle,et al.  A Rapid Heating and Cooling Rate Dilatometer for Measuring Thermal Expansion in Dental Porcelain , 1989, Journal of dental research.

[14]  D. Pascoe Analysis of the geometry of finishing lines for full crown restorations. , 1978, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[15]  M I MacEntee,et al.  Fit of three porcelain-fused-to-metal marginal designs in vivo: a scanning electron microscope study. , 1985, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.