Cell Phone Conversation and Relative Crash Risk

Experimental studies are not included because they cannot make valid estimates of actual crash risk, which requires real-world driving data. Experimental studies are conducted in a driving simulator, on a road or track closed to other traffic, and on public roadways, while the driver is under experimental control. The experimenter usually manipulates the timing and demands of secondary tasks, in artificial scenarios not freely chosen by the driver. In addition, experimental studies rarely represent driving conditions, demand levels, and environmental conditions that drivers will actually experience during real-world driving. In contrast, during real-world driving, drivers can choose whether, where, when, and how to engage in a secondary task during the primary driving task. Definitions of Terms

[1]  D. Strayer,et al.  Cell-Phone–Induced Driver Distraction , 2007 .

[2]  Xuru Ding,et al.  Road-to-Lab: Validation of the Static Load Test for Predicting On-Road Driving Performance While Using Advanced In-Vehicle Information and Communication Devices , 2017 .

[3]  Saurabh Bhargava,et al.  Driving under the (Cellular) Influence , 2013 .

[4]  Thomas A. Dingus,et al.  Near Crashes as Crash Surrogate for Naturalistic Driving Studies , 2010 .

[5]  Jed Kolko The Effects of Mobile Phones and Hands-Free Laws On Traffic Fatalities , 2007 .

[6]  Jeff K Caird,et al.  A meta-analysis of the effects of cell phones on driver performance. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[7]  R. Young Distracted driving and crash risk. , 2014 .

[8]  Douglas M. King,et al.  Assessing the long term benefit of banning the use of hand-held wireless devices while driving , 2012 .

[9]  Alison Smiley,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Driving Performance and Crash Risk Associated with the Use of Cellular Telephones while Driving , 2017 .

[10]  Junwook Chi,et al.  Are cell phone laws in the U.S. effective in reducing fatal crashes involving young drivers , 2013 .

[11]  R. Young,et al.  Cell Phone Use and Crash Risk: Evidence for Positive Bias , 2012, Epidemiology.

[12]  Cell Phone Use and Crash Risk , 2012 .

[13]  Li Hsieh,et al.  Conversation effects on neural mechanisms underlying reaction time to visual events while viewing a driving scene using MEG , 2009, Brain Research.

[14]  Charlene Hallett,et al.  Driver distraction and driver inattention: definition, relationship and taxonomy. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[15]  Richard A. Young,et al.  An unbiased estimate of the relative crash risk of cell phone conversation while driving an automobile , 2014 .

[16]  James R. Sayer,et al.  Naturalistic Census of Cell Phone Use , 2012 .

[17]  International Journal of Information Communication Technologies and Human Development , 2022 .

[18]  Trevor Collins Enhancing Outdoor Learning Through Participatory Design and Development: A Case Study of Embedding Mobile Learning at a Field Study Centre , 2015, Int. J. Mob. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[19]  M. Just,et al.  A decrease in brain activation associated with driving when listening to someone speak , 2008, Brain Research.

[20]  Christopher Schreiner,et al.  Real‐World Personal Conversations Using a Hands‐Free Embedded Wireless Device While Driving: Effect on Airbag‐Deployment Crash Rates , 2009, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[21]  Célina Roda,et al.  Comparing methods for handling missing data. , 2013, Epidemiology.

[22]  Li Hsieh,et al.  Conversation effects on neural mechanisms underlying reaction time to visual events while viewing a driving scene: fMRI analysis and asynchrony model , 2009, Brain Research.

[23]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  A selective review of simulated driving studies: Combining naturalistic and hybrid paradigms, analysis approaches, and future directions , 2012, NeuroImage.

[24]  K A Brookhuis,et al.  The effects of mobile telephoning on driving performance. , 1991, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[25]  Richard A. Young,et al.  Cognitive Distraction While Driving: A Critical Review of Definitions and Prevalence in Crashes , 2012 .

[26]  International Journal of Mobile Human Computer Interaction , 2022 .

[27]  Suzan Duygu Bedir Eristi,et al.  Effectiveness of Digital Storytelling on Cultural Awareness , 2014, Int. J. Inf. Commun. Technol. Hum. Dev..

[28]  Sheldon Howard Jacobson,et al.  Evaluating the impact of legislation prohibiting hand-held cell phone use while driving , 2010 .

[29]  Joshua E. Domeyer,et al.  Towards Operationalizing Driver Distraction , 2017 .

[30]  Li Hsieh,et al.  The Tactile Detection Response Task: Preliminary Validation for Measuring the Attentional Effects of Cognitive Load , 2017 .

[31]  Liisa Hakamies-Blomqvist,et al.  Older drivers do not have a high crash risk--a replication of low mileage bias. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[32]  L. Hakamies‐Blomqvist,et al.  Compensation in older drivers as reflected in their fatal accidents. , 1994, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[33]  Thomas A. Dingus,et al.  An Evaluation of Alternative Methods for Assessing Driver Workload in the Early Development of In-Vehicle Information Systems , 2002 .

[34]  Breno Sampaio,et al.  On the identification of the effect of prohibiting hand-held cell phone use while driving: Comment , 2010 .

[35]  M. Posner,et al.  Topics in Integrative Neuroscience: Attention as an organ system , 2008 .

[36]  T. Dingus,et al.  Distracted driving and risk of road crashes among novice and experienced drivers. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[37]  Richard A Young Association Between Embedded Cellular Phone Calls and Vehicle Crashes Involving Airbag Deployment , 2017 .

[38]  Junwook Chi,et al.  Cellphone bans and fatal motor vehicle crash rates in the United States , 2013, Journal of Public Health Policy.

[39]  John A. Michon,et al.  A critical view of driver behavior models: What do we know , 1985 .

[40]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Association between cellular-telephone calls and motor vehicle collisions. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[41]  R. Young Naturalistic Studies of Driver Distraction: Effects of Analysis Methods on Odds Ratios and Population Attributable Risk , 2017 .

[42]  Christopher S. Schreiner The Effect of Phone Interface and Dialing Method on Simulated Driving Performance and User Preference , 2006 .

[43]  Bolanle A. Olaniran,et al.  Organizational Communication: Assessment of Videoconferencing as a Medium for Meetings in the Workplace , 2009, Int. J. Technol. Hum. Interact..

[44]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Examining the Impact of Cell Phone Conversations on Driving Using Meta-Analytic Techniques , 2006, Hum. Factors.

[45]  Richard A. Young,et al.  Alliance Principle 1.4: Visual Downangle Criteria for Navigation and Telematics Displays in Vehicles , 2005 .

[46]  Li Hsieh,et al.  Development of the Enhanced Peripheral Detection Task: A Surrogate Test for Driver Distraction , 2012 .

[47]  Richard A. Young Event detection: the second dimension of driver performance for visual-manual tasks , 2012 .

[48]  Anne T McCartt,et al.  Hands-free embedded cell phones and airbag-deployment crash rates. , 2009, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[49]  Tova Rosenbloom,et al.  Driving performance while using cell phones: an observational study. , 2006, Journal of safety research.

[50]  Richard A. Young,et al.  Self-regulation minimizes crash risk from attentional effects of cognitive load during auditory-vocal tasks , 2014 .

[51]  George Yannis,et al.  Mobile phone use by young drivers: effects on traffic speed and headways , 2010 .

[52]  Richard A. Young Driving Consistency Errors Overestimate Crash Risk from Cellular Conversation in Two Case-Crossover Studies , 2017 .

[53]  M. Woodward,et al.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of strategies for the diagnosis of suspected pulmonary embolism , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[54]  Li Hsieh,et al.  Validation of the Static Load Test for Event Detection During Hands-Free Conversation , 2017 .