Heterogeneity in evolutionary games: an analysis of the risk perception

In this study, we analyse the relationship between heterogeneity and cooperation. Previous investigations suggest that this relation is non-trivial, as some authors found that heterogeneity sustains cooperation, while others obtained different results. Among the possible forms of heterogeneity, we focus on the individual perception of risks and rewards related to a generic event, which can appear in a number of social and biological systems. The modelling approach is based on the framework of evolutionary game theory. To represent this kind of heterogeneity, we implement small and local perturbations on the pay-off matrix of simple two-strategy games, such as the Prisoner’s Dilemma. So, while usually the pay-off is considered to be a global and time-invariant structure, i.e. it is the same for all individuals of a population at any time, in our model its value is continuously affected by small variations, in both time and space (i.e. position on a lattice). We found that such perturbations can be beneficial or detrimental to cooperation, depending on their setting. Notably, cooperation is strongly supported when perturbations act on the main diagonal of the pay-off matrix, whereas when they act on the off-diagonal the resulting effect is more difficult to quantify. To conclude, the proposed model shows a rich spectrum of possible equilibria, whose interpretation might offer insights and enrich the description of several systems.

[1]  M. Perc Coherence resonance in a spatial prisoner's dilemma game , 2006 .

[2]  Yuan Cheng,et al.  Effect of Heterogeneous Investments on the Evolution of Cooperation in Spatial Public Goods Game , 2015, PloS one.

[3]  S. Fortunato,et al.  Statistical physics of social dynamics , 2007, 0710.3256.

[4]  M. Nowak,et al.  Evolution of cooperation in stochastic games , 2018, Nature.

[5]  C. D. De Dreu Human Cooperation , 2013, Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society.

[6]  Matjaz Perc,et al.  Evolutionary mixed games in structured populations: Cooperation and the benefits of heterogeneity , 2016, Physical review. E.

[7]  Maxi San Miguel,et al.  Is the Voter Model a model for voters? , 2013, Physical review letters.

[8]  Sebastian J Schreiber,et al.  Spatial heterogeneity promotes coexistence of rock-paper-scissors metacommunities. , 2012, Theoretical population biology.

[9]  Jun Tanimoto,et al.  Enhancement of cooperation in the spatial prisoner's dilemma with a coherence-resonance effect through annealed randomness at a cooperator–defector boundary; comparison of two variant models , 2016 .

[10]  Marco Alberto Javarone Statistical Physics and Computational Methods for Evolutionary Game Theory , 2018 .

[11]  Matjaz Perc,et al.  Does strong heterogeneity promote cooperation by group interactions? , 2011, ArXiv.

[12]  Katarzyna Sznajd-Weron,et al.  Person-Situation Debate Revisited: Phase Transitions with Quenched and Annealed Disorders , 2017, Entropy.

[13]  F. C. Santos,et al.  The role of diversity in the evolution of cooperation. , 2012, Journal of theoretical biology.

[14]  Ericka Stricklin-Parker,et al.  Ann , 2005 .

[15]  A. Bratus,et al.  Evolutionary Games with Randomly Changing Payoff Matrices , 2015 .

[16]  Giuliano Armano,et al.  The Beneficial Role of Mobility for the Emergence of Innovation , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[17]  Bikas K. Chakrabarti,et al.  Sociophysics: An Introduction , 2014 .

[18]  M. Perc The social physics collective , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[19]  David G. Rand,et al.  Human cooperation , 2013, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[20]  M. Perc Double resonance in cooperation induced by noise and network variation for an evolutionary prisoner's dilemma , 2006 .

[21]  Josef Hofbauer,et al.  Evolution in games with randomly disturbed payoffs , 2007, J. Econ. Theory.

[22]  Matjaz Perc,et al.  Grand Challenges in Social Physics: In Pursuit of Moral Behavior , 2018, Front. Phys..

[23]  Lei Zhou,et al.  Simple property of heterogeneous aspiration dynamics: Beyond weak selection , 2018, Physical Review E.

[24]  Jun Tanimoto,et al.  Promotion of cooperation by payoff noise in a 2x2 game. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[25]  Lin Wang,et al.  Noise-induced enhancement of network reciprocity in social dilemmas , 2013, 1303.1959.

[26]  Chaitanya S. Gokhale,et al.  On equilibrium properties of evolutionary multi-player games with random payoff matrices. , 2012, Theoretical population biology.

[27]  Front , 2020, 2020 Fourth World Conference on Smart Trends in Systems, Security and Sustainability (WorldS4).

[28]  G. Szabó,et al.  Evolutionary games on graphs , 2006, cond-mat/0607344.

[29]  Serge Galam,et al.  Sociophysics: a personal testimony , 2004, physics/0403122.

[30]  S. Galam Contrarian deterministic effects on opinion dynamics: “the hung elections scenario” , 2003, cond-mat/0307404.

[31]  Maxi San Miguel,et al.  Erratum: Is the Voter Model a Model for Voters? , 2014 .

[32]  F. C. Santos,et al.  Evolutionary dynamics of social dilemmas in structured heterogeneous populations. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[34]  S. Snyder,et al.  Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 1999 .

[35]  M. Nowak Evolutionary Dynamics: Exploring the Equations of Life , 2006 .

[36]  Martin A. Nowak,et al.  Evolutionary dynamics with game transitions , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  G. Szabó,et al.  Cooperation in the noisy case: Prisoner's dilemma game on two types of regular random graphs. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[38]  B. Bollobás The evolution of random graphs , 1984 .

[39]  Lucas Wardil,et al.  Cooperation in two-dimensional mixed-games , 2015, 1505.03875.

[40]  F. W. S.,et al.  Principles of Genetics , 1939, Nature.

[41]  L. Segal John , 2013, The Messianic Secret.

[42]  M. Perc,et al.  Social diversity and promotion of cooperation in the spatial prisoner's dilemma game. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[43]  P. Erdos,et al.  On the evolution of random graphs , 1984 .

[44]  Ulrik Brandes,et al.  What is network science? , 2013, Network Science.

[45]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Different perceptions of social dilemmas: Evolutionary multigames in structured populations , 2014, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[46]  Daniele Marinazzo,et al.  Evolutionary dynamics of group formation , 2016, PloS one.

[47]  Marco Alberto Javarone,et al.  Statistical physics of the spatial Prisoner’s Dilemma with memory-aware agents , 2015, 1509.04558.

[48]  Serge Galam,et al.  SOCIOPHYSICS: A REVIEW OF GALAM MODELS , 2008, 0803.1800.

[49]  M. Perc,et al.  Assortativity provides a narrow margin for enhanced cooperation on multilayer networks , 2019, New Journal of Physics.

[50]  J Gómez-Gardeñes,et al.  Dynamical organization of cooperation in complex topologies. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[51]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Dynamic-sensitive cooperation in the presence of multiple strategy updating rules , 2018, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications.

[52]  P. Harwood Michael , 1985 .

[53]  G. Szabó,et al.  Evolutionary potential games on lattices , 2015, 1508.03147.

[54]  Marco Alberto Javarone,et al.  Heterogeneous update mechanisms in evolutionary games: Mixing innovative and imitative dynamics. , 2017, Physical review. E.

[55]  Jan Nagler,et al.  Unfair and Anomalous Evolutionary Dynamics from Fluctuating Payoffs. , 2018, Physical review letters.

[56]  J. Cuesta,et al.  Heterogeneous networks do not promote cooperation when humans play a Prisoner’s Dilemma , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[57]  R. Holley,et al.  Ergodic Theorems for Weakly Interacting Infinite Systems and the Voter Model , 1975 .

[58]  A. Sparrow,et al.  A heterogeneity of heterogeneities. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[59]  Jun Tanimoto,et al.  Various error settings bring different noise-driven effects on network reciprocity in spatial prisoner's dilemma , 2018, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals.

[60]  Alexandre Souto Martinez,et al.  Cooperation risk and Nash equilibrium: quantitative description for realistic players , 2018, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications.

[61]  Enrique Fatas,et al.  Globalization and human cooperation , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[62]  Josef Hofbauer,et al.  Evolutionary Games and Population Dynamics , 1998 .

[63]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Seasonal payoff variations and the evolution of cooperation in social dilemmas , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[64]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[65]  F. C. Santos,et al.  Social diversity promotes the emergence of cooperation in public goods games , 2008, Nature.

[66]  Sarah Mathew,et al.  Human large-scale cooperation as a product of competition between cultural groups , 2020, Nature Communications.

[67]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Statistical Physics of Human Cooperation , 2017, ArXiv.

[68]  Giuliano Armano,et al.  Perception of similarity: a model for social network dynamics , 2013 .

[69]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Coevolutionary Games - A Mini Review , 2009, Biosyst..

[70]  Y Moreno,et al.  Effects of mobility in a population of prisoner's dilemma players. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[71]  Yu Kang,et al.  Social diversity promotes cooperation in spatial multigames , 2017 .

[72]  G. Szabó,et al.  Phase diagrams for an evolutionary prisoner's dilemma game on two-dimensional lattices. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.