Understanding Shareholder Activism: Which Corporations are Targeted?

This study provides preliminary empirical evidence that shareholder activists target companies because of their size as well as specific stakeholder-related practices. The data show that shareholder activists target companies with shareholder resolutions demanding changes in corporate behaviors for companies producing problematic products and where environmental concerns exist. Furthermore, companies in specific industries are targeted based on poor employee and community-related practices. Activists, that is, are selective in their targeting of companies, choosing the most visible (largest) companies and those whose practices raise specific issues of interest to society.

[1]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  Hidden Value: How Great Companies Achieve Extraordinary Results with Ordinary People , 2000 .

[2]  Mark A. Huselid.  The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Turnover, Productivity, and Corporate Financial Performance , 1995 .

[3]  Peter A. Soyka,et al.  Does Improving a Firm's Environmental Management System and Environmental Performance Result in a Higher Stock Price? , 1997 .

[4]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  Putting people first for organizational success , 1999 .

[5]  K. Pauul,et al.  Applications of Corporate Social Monitoring Systems , 1992 .

[6]  Stewart J. Schwab,et al.  Realigning Corporate Governance: Shareholder Activism by Labor Unions , 1993 .

[7]  Casey Ichniowski,et al.  The Effects of Human Resource Management Systems on Economic Performance: An International Comparison of U.S. and Japanese Plants , 1999 .

[8]  Jeff Frooman.  Stakeholder Influence Strategies , 1999 .

[9]  Performance Characteristics of Social and Traditional Investments , 2000 .

[10]  Samuel B. Graves,et al.  Fad and Fashion in Shareholder Activism: The Landscape of Shareholder Resolutions, 1988–1998 , 2001 .

[11]  John M. Bizjak,et al.  Are Shareholder Proposals All Bark and No Bite? Evidence from Shareholder Resolutions to Rescind Poison Pills , 1998, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[12]  Eugene Szwajkowski,et al.  Evaluating Corporate Performance: A Comparison of the Fortune Reputation Survey and the Socrates Social Rating Database , 1999 .

[13]  T. Cox,et al.  Managing cultural diversity: implications for organizational competitiveness , 1991 .

[14]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  The External Control of Organizations. , 1978 .

[15]  John E. Delery,et al.  AN ORGANIZATION-LEVEL ANALYSIS OF VOLUNTARY AND INVOLUNTARY TURNOVER , 2005 .

[16]  Samuel B. Graves,et al.  Determining Best Practice in Corporate-Stakeholder Relations Using Data Envelopment Analysis , 1998 .

[17]  Parthiban David,et al.  The Influence of Activism by Institutional Investors on R&D , 2001 .

[18]  S. Key.  ANALYZING MANAGERIAL DISCRETION: AN ASSESSMENT TOOL TO PREDICT INDIVIDUAL POLICY DECISIONS , 1997 .

[19]  K. Paul,et al.  Applications of corporate social monitoring systems; types, dimensions, and goals , 1992 .

[20]  M. Pava,et al.  The association between corporate social-responsibility and financial performance: The paradox of social cost , 1996 .

[21]  N. Vafeas.  Board meeting frequency and firm performance , 1999 .

[22]  G. Powell,et al.  Are Board Members Pawns or Watchdogs? , 1998 .

[23]  William B. Stevenson,et al.  Managing the Corporate Social Environment: A Grounded Theory , 1986 .

[24]  Samuel B. Graves,et al.  Institutional Owners and Corporate Social Performance , 1994 .

[25]  Edmund M. Burke,et al.  Corporate Community Relations: The Principle of the Neighbor of Choice , 1999 .

[26]  D. Kirk Davidson,et al.  Selling Sin: The Marketing of Socially Unacceptable Products , 1996 .

[27]  J. A. Corlett.  The “Modified Vendetta Sanction” as a method of corporate-collective punishment , 1989 .

[28]  Norman R. Holmes,et al.  Business and Society , 1974 .

[29]  D. Greening,et al.  Corporate Governance, Shareholder Proposals, and Social Performance: Organizational Response to Environmental Change and Stakeholder Pressure , 1998 .

[30]  A. Hillman,et al.  Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: what's the bottom line? , 2001 .

[31]  D. Wood,et al.  STAKEHOLDER MISMATCHING: A THEORETICAL PROBLEM IN EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON CORPORATE SOCIAL PERFORMANCE , 1995 .

[32]  Mark P. Sharfman,et al.  A Construct Validity Study of the KLD Social Performance Ratings Data , 1993 .

[33]  Leslie E. Palich,et al.  Cultural Diversity and the Performance of Multinational Firms , 1997 .

[34]  B. Gerhart,et al.  The Impact of Human Resource Management on Organizational Performance: Progress and Prospects , 1996 .

[35]  Timothy W. Nix,et al.  Strategies for assessing and managing organizational stakeholders , 1991 .

[36]  S. Waddock,et al.  Relationships: The real challenge of corporate global citizenship , 2000 .

[37]  Wallace N. Davidson,et al.  Influencing Managers to Change Unpopular Corporate Behavior through Boycotts and Divestitures , 1995 .

[38]  Shawn L. Berman,et al.  Does Stakeholder Orientation Matter? The Relationship Between Stakeholder Management Models and Firm Financial Performance , 1999 .

[39]  Meghna Virick,et al.  Strategic human resource management: Employee involvement, diversity, and international issues , 1998 .

[40]  Charles B. Shrader,et al.  Women In Management And Firm Financial Performance: An Exploratory Study , 1997 .

[41]  Ronald K. Mitchell,et al.  Who Matters to Ceos? An Investigation of Stakeholder Attributes and Salience, Corpate Performance, and Ceo Values , 1999 .

[42]  Mark Starik,et al.  Should trees have managerial standing? Toward stakeholder status for non-human nature , 1995 .

[43]  Jeffrey L. Kerr,et al.  The Effects of Outside Directors and Board Shareholdings on the Relation Between Chief Executive Compensation and Firm Performance , 1997 .

[44]  Cedric E. Dawkins.  Corporate Welfare, Corporate Citizenship, and the Question of Accountability , 2002 .

[45]  Mark P. Sharfman.  The construct validity of the Kinder, Lydenberg & Domini social performance ratings data , 1996 .

[46]  M. Russo,et al.  A Resource-Based Perspective On Corporate Environmental Performance And Profitability , 1997 .

[47]  J. D. Margolis,et al.  People and profits? : the search for a link between a company's social and financial performance , 2001 .

[48]  Blake E. Ashforth,et al.  How can you do it?: Dirty work and the challenge of constructing a positive identity , 1999 .

[49]  Stuart L. Gillan,et al.  Relationship Investing and Shareholder Activism by Institutional Investors: The Wealth Effects of Corporate Governance Related Proposals , 1999 .

[50]  Samuel B. Graves,et al.  The corporate social performance-financial performance link , 1997 .

[51]  H. Johnston,et al.  Social Movements and Culture , 1995 .

[52]  Mark A. Huselid,et al.  Technical and Strategic Human Resource Management Effectiveness as Determinants of Firm Performance , 1997 .

[53]  Tim Rowley.  Moving Beyond Dyadic Ties: A Network Theory of Stakeholder Influences , 1997 .

[54]  M. Zenner,et al.  A requiem for the USA Is small shareholder monitoring effective , 1996 .

[55]  Hank Johnson,et al.  New Social Movements: From Ideology to Identity , 1994 .

[56]  T. Guay,et al.  Non-Governmental Organizations, Shareholder Activism, and Socially Responsible Investments: Ethical, Strategic, and Governance Implications , 2004 .

[57]  D. Schuler,et al.  Testing the Firm as a Filter of Corporate Political Action , 1999 .

[58]  N. Smith,et al.  Ethics and Target Marketing: The Role of Product Harm and Consumer Vulnerability , 1997 .

[59]  R. Buchholz.  Private Management and Public Policy , 1996 .

[60]  D. Wood.  Corporate Social Performance Revisited , 1991 .

[61]  Michael P. Smith.  Shareholder Activism by Institutional Investors: Evidence from CalPERS , 1996 .

[62]  Tim Rowley,et al.  When Will Stakeholder Groups Act? An Interest- and Identity-Based Model of Stakeholder Group Mobilization , 2003 .

[63]  Eric Abrahamson,et al.  Assessing Managerial Discretion across Industries: A Multimethod Approach , 1995 .