Premature Discontinuation of Randomized Trials in Critical and Emergency Care: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Objectives:Randomized clinical trials that enroll patients in critical or emergency care (acute care) setting are challenging because of narrow time windows for recruitment and the inability of many patients to provide informed consent. To assess the extent that recruitment challenges lead to randomized clinical trial discontinuation, we compared the discontinuation of acute care and nonacute care randomized clinical trials. Design:Retrospective cohort of 894 randomized clinical trials approved by six institutional review boards in Switzerland, Germany, and Canada between 2000 and 2003. Setting:Randomized clinical trials involving patients in an acute or nonacute care setting. Subjects and Interventions:We recorded trial characteristics, self-reported trial discontinuation, and self-reported reasons for discontinuation from protocols, corresponding publications, institutional review board files, and a survey of investigators. Measurements and Main Results:Of 894 randomized clinical trials, 64 (7%) were acute care randomized clinical trials (29 critical care and 35 emergency care). Compared with the 830 nonacute care randomized clinical trials, acute care randomized clinical trials were more frequently discontinued (28 of 64, 44% vs 221 of 830, 27%; p = 0.004). Slow recruitment was the most frequent reason for discontinuation, both in acute care (13 of 64, 20%) and in nonacute care randomized clinical trials (7 of 64, 11%). Logistic regression analyses suggested the acute care setting as an independent risk factor for randomized clinical trial discontinuation specifically as a result of slow recruitment (odds ratio, 4.00; 95% CI, 1.72–9.31) after adjusting for other established risk factors, including nonindustry sponsorship and small sample size. Conclusions:Acute care randomized clinical trials are more vulnerable to premature discontinuation than nonacute care randomized clinical trials and have an approximately four-fold higher risk of discontinuation due to slow recruitment. These results highlight the need for strategies to reliably prevent and resolve slow patient recruitment in randomized clinical trials conducted in the critical and emergency care setting.

[1]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Completion and Publication Rates of Randomized Controlled Trials in Surgery: An Empirical Study. , 2015, Annals of surgery.

[2]  P. Bower,et al.  Interventions to improve recruitment and retention in clinical trials: a survey and workshop to assess current practice and future priorities , 2014, Trials.

[3]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: cohort study on trial protocols and journal publications , 2014, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[4]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: cohort study on trial protocols and journal publications , 2014, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[5]  Ignacio Ferreira-González,et al.  Prevalence, characteristics, and publication of discontinued randomized trials. , 2014, JAMA.

[6]  Ellen McDonald,et al.  Research recruitment practices and critically ill patients. A multicenter, cross-sectional study (the Consent Study). , 2013, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[7]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Learning from failure - rationale and design for a study about discontinuation of randomized trials (DISCO study) , 2012, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[8]  P. V. van Eeden,et al.  Critical illness in the emergency department: Lessons learnt from the first 12 months of enrolments in the Critical Illness and Shock Study , 2012, Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA.

[9]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Prospectively screening for eligible patients was inaccurate in predicting patient recruitment of orthopedic randomized trials. , 2011, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[10]  Andrew Cook,et al.  A systematic review of models to predict recruitment to multicentre clinical trials , 2010, BMC medical research methodology.

[11]  S. Asch,et al.  Emergency department research in palliative care: challenges in recruitment. , 2009, Journal of palliative medicine.

[12]  R. Bellomo,et al.  Screening and Study Enrolment in the Randomized Evaluation of Normal vs. Augmented Level (RENAL) Replacement Therapy Trial , 2009, Blood Purification.

[13]  D. Cook,et al.  Fluid resuscitation in the management of early septic shock (FINESS): a randomized controlled feasibility trial , 2008, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.

[14]  M. Matthay,et al.  Reasons for nonenrollment in a clinical trial of acute lung injury. , 2008, Chest.

[15]  D. Choudhury,et al.  Lessons for successful study enrollment from the Veterans Affairs/National Institutes of Health Acute Renal Failure Trial Network Study. , 2008, Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN.

[16]  K. Anstrom,et al.  Challenges in enrollment of minority, pediatric, and geriatric patients in emergency and acute care clinical research. , 2008, Annals of emergency medicine.

[17]  Michael G Kenward,et al.  Multiple imputation: current perspectives , 2007, Statistical methods in medical research.

[18]  S. Johnston,et al.  Recruiting Subjects for Acute Stroke Trials: A Meta-Analysis , 2006, Stroke.

[19]  Subject recruitment in critical care nursing research: a complex task in a complex environment. , 2003, Heart & lung : the journal of critical care.